IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wsirep/65.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Homeoffice: Was wir aus der Zeit der Pandemie für die zukünftige Gestaltung von Homeoffice lernen können

Author

Listed:
  • Ahlers, Elke
  • Mierich, Sandra
  • Zucco, Aline

Abstract

Homeoffice hat sich pandemiebedingt von heute auf morgen zum Arbeitsalltag vieler Beschäftigter entwickelt. Sofern arbeitsorganisatorisch möglich, galt es in vielen Bereichen der Arbeitswelt als naheliegender Ansatz der Pandemiebewältigung. Wie aber können wir die vielfältigen Erfahrungen der Pandemie nutzen, um Homeoffice auch später als zukunftsfähiges Arbeitsarrangement einzusetzen? Die Befunde aus vier Erhebungswellen (April, Juni und November 2020 sowie Januar 2021) der HBS-Erwerbstätigenbefragung dokumentieren, wie zufrieden oder unzufrieden Arbeitnehmer:innen im Homeoffice waren, und geben Hinweise an die Hand, welche Rahmenbedingungen gutes Homeoffice stützen. Der Report zeigt, dass Homeoffice gerade dann positiv erlebt wird, wenn - es im Betrieb bereits Erfahrungen mit Homeoffice gibt, das heißt, dass auch schon im Vorfeld Regulierungen zur Ausstattung mit mobilen Geräten vorhanden waren und dass aus der Ferne auf interne Netze und Datenbanken zugegriffen werden kann; - einer Entgrenzung der Arbeitszeiten über betriebliche Regulierungen zum Homeoffice vorgebeugt wird; - die Arbeitsbelastungen am heimischen Arbeitsplatz erträglich sind; - die Wohnsituation für das Homeoffice geeignet ist. Zugleich zeigen sich aber auch die Risiken und Nachteile des Homeoffice. Diese bestehen in erster Linie in den mangelnden Kommunikationsmöglichkeiten unter den Kolleg:innen und der Gefahr von Arbeitszeitentgrenzung und Überlastung.Außerdem belegen Erfahrungen mit Betriebs- und Dienstvereinbarungen zum orts- und zeitflexiblen Arbeiten sowie die Analysen solcher Vereinbarungen durch die Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, wie Homeoffice mit Unterstützung betrieblicher Mitbestimmung gelingen kann.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahlers, Elke & Mierich, Sandra & Zucco, Aline, 2021. "Homeoffice: Was wir aus der Zeit der Pandemie für die zukünftige Gestaltung von Homeoffice lernen können," WSI Reports 65, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wsirep:65
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/233635/1/1756653445.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alipour, Jean-Victor & Falck, Oliver & Schüller, Simone, 2023. "Germany’s capacity to work from home," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    2. Alipour, Jean-Victor & Falck, Oliver & Schüller, Simone, 2020. "Germany's Capacities to Work from Home," IZA Discussion Papers 13152, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin Lange & Ina Kayser, 2022. "The Role of Self-Efficacy, Work-Related Autonomy and Work-Family Conflict on Employee’s Stress Level during Home-Based Remote Work in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Hay, Daniel & Mierich, Sandra & Werner, Nils, 2021. "Mitbestimmung als Konstante in der Pandemie: Monitor Digitalisierung in Betriebsvereinbarungen," Mitbestimmungsreport 69, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    3. Ahlers, Elke & Lübker, Malte, 2021. "Corona-Schnelltests am Arbeitsplatz: Einblicke aus der WSI-Lohnspiegel-Datenbank," WSI Policy Briefs 56, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eisfeld, Rupert-Klaas & Heinemann, Ann-Kathrin & Just, Tobias & Quitzau, Jörn, . "Büroimmobilien nach Corona - Eine Szenarienanalyse," Beiträge zur Immobilienwirtschaft, University of Regensburg, Department of Economics, number 27, August.
    2. Michael Christl & Silvia Poli & Tine Hufkens & Andreas Peichl & Mattia Ricci, 2023. "The role of short-time work and discretionary policy measures in mitigating the effects of the COVID-19 crisis in Germany," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 30(4), pages 1107-1136, August.
    3. Abel Brodeur & David Gray & Anik Islam & Suraiya Bhuiyan, 2021. "A literature review of the economics of COVID‐19," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 1007-1044, September.
    4. Marz, Waldemar & Şen, Suphi, 2022. "Does telecommuting reduce commuting emissions?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    5. Alipour, Jean-Victor & Fadinger, Harald & Schymik, Jan, 2021. "My home is my castle – The benefits of working from home during a pandemic crisis," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    6. Holgersen, Henning & Jia, Zhiyang & Svenkerud, Simen, 2021. "Who and how many can work from home? Evidence from task descriptions," Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 55, pages 1-4.
    7. Bloom, Nicholas & Davis, Steven J. & Hansen, Stephen & Lambert, Peter John & Sadun, Raffaella & Taska, Bledi, 2023. "Remote work across jobs, companies and space," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121302, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Astorquiza-Bustos, Bilver Adrian & Quintero-Peña, Jose Wilmar, 2023. "Who can work from home? A remote working index for an emerging economy," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10).
    9. Ludivine Martin & Laetitia Hauret & Chantal Fuhrer, 2022. "Digitally transformed home office impacts on job satisfaction, job stress and job productivity. COVID-19 findings," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-23, March.
    10. Pouliakas, Konstantinos, 2020. "Working at Home in Greece: Unexplored Potential at Times of Social Distancing?," IZA Discussion Papers 13408, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Laroze, Denise & Neumayer, Eric & Plümper, Thomas, 2021. "COVID-19 does not stop at open borders: Spatial contagion among local authority districts during England's first wave," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    12. A. Cetrulo & D. Guarascio & M. E. Virgillito, 2022. "Working from home and the explosion of enduring divides: income, employment and safety risks," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 39(2), pages 345-402, July.
    13. Jean-Victor Alipour & Harald Fadinger & Jan Schymik, 2020. "My Home Is my Castle – The Benefits of Working from Home During a Pandemic Crisis Evidence from Germany," ifo Working Paper Series 329, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    14. Christina Boll & Simone Schüller, 2020. "Die Lage ist ernst, aber nicht hoffnungslos – empirisch gestützte Überlegungen zur elterlichen Aufteilung der Kinderbetreuung vor, während und nach dem COVID-19 Lockdown," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1089, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    15. Schüller, Simone & Steinberg, Hannah S., 2022. "Parents under stress: Evaluating emergency childcare policies during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Germany," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    16. Ben Yahmed, Sarra & Berlingieri, Francesco & Brüll, Eduard, 2022. "Adjustments of local labour markets to the COVID-19 crisis: The role of digitalisation and working-from-home," ZEW Discussion Papers 22-031, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    17. Marco Hölzel & Walter Timo de Vries, 2021. "Digitization as a Driver fur Rural Development—An Indicative Description of German Coworking Space Users," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    18. Aditya Goenka & Lin Liu & Manh-Hung Nguyen, 2021. "Modeling optimal quarantines with waning immunity," Discussion Papers 21-10, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham.
    19. Christina Boll & Simone Schüller, 2020. "Quo vadis paarinterne Arbeitsteilung post coronam? [The domestic division of labour: Quo vadis post-COVID-19?]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 100(7), pages 556-558, July.
    20. Otto, Anne & Fuchs, Michaela & Stabler, Jochen, 2021. "Systemrelevante Berufe und das Potenzial für Homeoffice: Eine geschlechtsspezifische Bestandsaufnahme für das Saarland," IAB-Regional. Berichte und Analysen aus dem Regionalen Forschungsnetz. IAB Rheinland-Pfalz-Saarland 202101, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wsirep:65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wsihbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.