IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wsipbs/56.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Corona-Schnelltests am Arbeitsplatz: Einblicke aus der WSI-Lohnspiegel-Datenbank

Author

Listed:
  • Ahlers, Elke
  • Lübker, Malte

Abstract

Der vorliegende Policy Brief verfolgt zwei Ziele. Zum einen dokumentiert er wesentliche Entwicklungen des betrieblichen Gesundheitsschutzes aus der Perspektive der Beschäftigten. Hierzu zählt, wie sich die Sorge der Beschäftigten vor einer Ansteckung im beruflichen Kontext im Verlauf der Pandemie entwickelt hat und wie diese die Infektionsschutzmaßnahmen der Arbeitgeber einschätzen. Der Einführung von Schnelltests in der zweiten Märzhälfte und im April 2021 gilt dabei ein besonderes Augenmerk. Daten-grundlage hierfür ist die WSI-Lohnspiegel-Datenbank. Zur Einführung von betrieblichen Schnelltests werden zusätzlich auch andere Datenquellen dokumentiert. Zum anderen richtet sich das erkenntnisleitende Interesse auf eine Reihe von weiteren konkreten Fragestellungen. Hierzu zählt, ob die letztendlich erfolgte Verpflichtung der Betriebe, ihren Präsenz-Beschäftigten regelmäßige Schnelltests anzubieten, den Zugang zu betrieblichen Schnell-tests verbessert hat. Außerdem wird geprüft, inwieweit der Zugang zu betrieblichen Schnelltests die Sorge der Beschäftigten vor einer Ansteckung am Arbeitsplatz mindert und ob er ihre Zufriedenheit mit den Arbeits- und Infektionsschutzmaßnahmen der Arbeitgeber fördert.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahlers, Elke & Lübker, Malte, 2021. "Corona-Schnelltests am Arbeitsplatz: Einblicke aus der WSI-Lohnspiegel-Datenbank," WSI Policy Briefs 56, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wsipbs:56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/234034/1/1757705406.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bonin, Holger & Eichhorst, Werner & Krause-Pilatus, Annabelle & Rinne, Ulf & Jungnickel, Vincent, 2021. "Wirksamkeitsanalyse der Corona-Maßnahmen," IZA Research Reports 110, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Dunning,Thad, 2012. "Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107017665, November.
    3. Ahlers, Elke & Mierich, Sandra & Zucco, Aline, 2021. "Homeoffice: Was wir aus der Zeit der Pandemie für die zukünftige Gestaltung von Homeoffice lernen können," WSI Reports 65, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    4. Dunning,Thad, 2012. "Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107698000, November.
    5. Dieter Cassel & Volker Ulrich, 2021. "Corona-Impfstoffe im Überfluss — was dann? [Coronavirus Vaccines in Abundance — What Then?]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(4), pages 276-283, April.
    6. Erol, Serife & Schulten, Thorsten, 2020. "Neuordnung der Arbeitsbeziehungen in der Fleischindustrie: Das Ende der "organisierten Verantwortungslosigkeit"?," WSI Reports 61, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    7. ., 2021. "The coronavirus pandemic and international trade policy," Chapters, in: Navigating the Free Trade–Fair Trade Fault-Lines, chapter 0, pages 89-107, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ratchford, Brian & Soysal, Gonca & Zentner, Alejandro & Gauri, Dinesh K., 2022. "Online and offline retailing: What we know and directions for future research," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 152-177.
    2. Adam Brzezinski & Nuno Palma & François R. Velde, 2024. "Understanding Money Using Historical Evidence," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 16(1), pages 571-595, August.
    3. Grüner Sven, 2020. "Sample Size Calculation in Economic Experiments," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 240(6), pages 791-823, December.
    4. Paolo Pinotti, 0. "The Credibility Revolution in the Empirical Analysis of Crime," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 0, pages 1-14.
    5. Oded Galor & Ömer Özak, 2016. "The Agricultural Origins of Time Preference," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(10), pages 3064-3103, October.
    6. Du, Yao & Sun, Guibo & Heinen, Eva, 2024. "Does subjective wellbeing modify travel behaviour changes among older people in response to a new metro line?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    7. Catherine Welch & Eriikka Paavilainen-Mäntymäki & Rebecca Piekkari & Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki, 2022. "Reconciling theory and context: How the case study can set a new agenda for international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(1), pages 4-26, February.
    8. Gregory J. Wawro & Ira Katznelson, 2020. "American political development and new challenges of causal inference," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 185(3), pages 299-314, December.
    9. de Renzio, Paolo & Wehner, Joachim, 2017. "The impacts of fiscal openness," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 82521, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Arzi Adbi, 2023. "Financial Sustainability of For-Profit Versus Non-Profit Microfinance Organizations Following a Scandal," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 57-74, November.
    11. Adel Daoud, 2020. "The wealth of nations and the health of populations: A quasi-experimental design of the impact of sovereign debt crises on child mortality," Papers 2012.14941, arXiv.org.
    12. John Gerring & Lee Cojocaru, 2016. "Selecting Cases for Intensive Analysis," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 45(3), pages 392-423, August.
    13. Kendall D. Funk & Erica Owen, 2020. "Consequences of an Anti‐Corruption Experiment for Local Government Performance in Brazil," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 444-468, March.
    14. Natália S. Bueno & Thad Dunning, 2016. "Race, resources, and representation: Evidence from Brazilian politicians," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2016-144, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    15. Isabel J. Raabe & Alexander Ehlert & David Johann & Heiko Rauhut, 2020. "Satisfaction of scientists during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-7, December.
    16. James Mahoney & Andrew Owen, 2022. "Importing set-theoretic tools into quantitative research: the case of necessary and sufficient conditions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2001-2022, August.
    17. Yiannis Georgiou & Eleni A. Kyza, 2023. "Fostering Chemistry Students’ Scientific Literacy for Responsible Citizenship through Socio-Scientific Inquiry-Based Learning (SSIBL)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    18. Claudia Schütze & Catherine Cleophas & Monideepa Tarafdar, 2020. "Revenue management systems as symbiotic analytics systems: insights from a field study," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 1007-1031, November.
    19. Shige Song & Weidong Wang, 2019. "Testing the Only-Child Advantage in Cognitive Development in the Context of China’s One-Child Policy," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 38(6), pages 841-867, December.
    20. Scott Gates & Mogens K. Justesen, 2020. "Political Trust, Shocks, and Accountability: Quasi-experimental Evidence from a Rebel Attack," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 64(9), pages 1693-1723, October.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wsipbs:56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wsihbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.