Revisiting a Remedy Against Chains of Unkindness
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Other versions of this item:
- Wendelin Schnedler & Nina Lucia Stephan, 2020. "Revisiting a Remedy Against Chains of Unkindness," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 72(3), pages 347-364, July.
- Schnedler, Wendelin & Stephan, Nina Lucia, 2020. "Revisiting a Remedy against the Chain of Unkindness," IZA Discussion Papers 13135, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
References listed on IDEAS
- Friebel, Guido & Schnedler, Wendelin, 2011.
"Team governance: Empowerment or hierarchical control,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 1-13.
- Friebel, Guido & Schnedler, Wendelin, 2011. "Team governance: Empowerment or hierarchical control," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 78(1-2), pages 1-13, April.
- Friebel, Guido & Schnedler, Wendelin, 2007. "Team Governance: Empowerment of Hierarchical Control," IDEI Working Papers 520, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse.
- Guido Friebel & Wendelin Schnedler, 2011. "Team Governance: Empowerment or Hierarchical Control," Post-Print hal-00978261, HAL.
- Friebel, Guido & Schnedler, Wendelin, 2007. "Team Governance: Empowerment or Hierarchical Control," IZA Discussion Papers 3143, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Friebel, Guido & Schnedler, Wendelin, 2007. "Team Governance: Empowerment or Hierarchical Control," CEPR Discussion Papers 6575, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Urs Fischbacher, 2007. "z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 10(2), pages 171-178, June.
- repec:cup:judgdm:v:4:y:2009:i:7:p:543-553 is not listed on IDEAS
- Erin L. Krupka & Roberto A. Weber, 2013.
"Identifying Social Norms Using Coordination Games: Why Does Dictator Game Sharing Vary?,"
Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 11(3), pages 495-524, June.
- Krupka, Erin L. & Weber, Roberto A., 2008. "Identifying Social Norms Using Coordination Games: Why Does Dictator Game Sharing Vary?," IZA Discussion Papers 3860, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- repec:awi:wpaper:0417 is not listed on IDEAS
- Ben-Ner, Avner & Putterman, Louis & Kong, Fanmin & Magan, Dan, 2004.
"Reciprocity in a two-part dictator game,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 333-352, March.
- Avner Ben-Ner & Famin Kong & Louis Putterman & Dan Magan, "undated". "Reciprocity in a Two-Part Dictator Game," Working Papers 0902, Human Resources and Labor Studies, University of Minnesota (Twin Cities Campus).
- Avner Ben-Ner & Louis Putterman, 1999. "Reciprocity in a Two Part Dictator Game," Working Papers 99-28, Brown University, Department of Economics.
- Oechssler, Jörg, 2010.
"Searching beyond the lamppost: Let's focus on economically relevant questions,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 65-67, January.
- Oechssler, Jörg, 2009. "Searching beyond the lamppost: Let’s focus on economically relevant questions," Working Papers 0486, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
- Ernst Fehr & Urs Fischbacher, "undated".
"Third Party Punishment and Social Norms,"
IEW - Working Papers
106, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
- Ernst Fehr & Urs Fischbacher, 2004. "Third-party punishment and social norms," Experimental 0409002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- John A. List, 2007.
"On the Interpretation of Giving in Dictator Games,"
Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 115(3), pages 482-493.
- John List, 2007. "On the Interpretation of Giving in Dictator Games," Artefactual Field Experiments 00479, The Field Experiments Website.
- Joel van der Weele, 2012. "The Signaling Power of Sanctions in Social Dilemmas," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 28(1), pages 103-126.
- Christoph Engel, 2011.
"Dictator games: a meta study,"
Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 14(4), pages 583-610, November.
- Christoph Engel, 2010. "Dictator Games: A Meta Study," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2010_07, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, revised Jan 2011.
- Stanca, Luca, 2009.
"Measuring indirect reciprocity: Whose back do we scratch?,"
Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 190-202, April.
- Luca Stanca, 2007. "Measuring Indirect Reciprocity: Whose Back Do We Scratch?," Working Papers 131, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised Nov 2007.
- Wendelin Schnedler, 2005. "Likelihood Estimation for Censored Random Vectors," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 195-217.
- Nicholas Bardsley, 2008. "Dictator game giving: altruism or artefact?," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 11(2), pages 122-133, June.
- Koukoumelis, Anastasios & Levati, M. Vittoria, 2019. "An experiment investigating the spillover effects of communication opportunities," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 147-157.
- Ben Greiner, 2015. "Subject pool recruitment procedures: organizing experiments with ORSEE," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 1(1), pages 114-125, July.
- Andreas Diekmann, 2004. "The Power of Reciprocity," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 48(4), pages 487-505, August.
- Herne, Kaisa & Lappalainen, Olli & Kestilä-Kekkonen, Elina, 2013. "Experimental comparison of direct, general, and indirect reciprocity," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 38-46.
- Redzo Mujcic & Andreas Leibbrandt, 2018.
"Indirect Reciprocity and Prosocial Behaviour: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment,"
Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 128(611), pages 1683-1699, June.
- Andreas Leibbrandt & Redzo Mujcic, 2016. "Indirect Reciprocity and Prosocial Behaviour: Evidence from a natural field experiment," Natural Field Experiments 00581, The Field Experiments Website.
- Xiao, Erte & Houser, Daniel, 2009. "Avoiding the sharp tongue: Anticipated written messages promote fair economic exchange," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 393-404, June.
- Bahr Gunter & Requate Till, 2014. "Reciprocity and Giving in a Consecutive Three-Person Dictator Game with Social Interaction," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 15(3), pages 374-392, August.
- Martin A. Nowak & Karl Sigmund, 2005. "Evolution of indirect reciprocity," Nature, Nature, vol. 437(7063), pages 1291-1298, October.
- Gunter Bahr & Till Requate, 2014. "Reciprocity and Giving in a Consecutive Three-Person Dictator Game with Social Interaction," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 15(3), pages 374-392, August.
- Benndorf, Volker & Rau, Holger A. & Sölch, Christian, 2018. "Minimizing learning behavior in repeated real-effort tasks," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 343, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
- Erte Xiao & Daniel Houser, 2005. "Emotion expression in human punishment behavior," Experimental 0504003, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 18 May 2005.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Schnedler, Wendelin, 2022.
"The broken chain: evidence against emotionally driven upstream indirect reciprocity,"
EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 136, pages 542-558.
- Schnedler, Wendelin, 2022. "The broken chain: Evidence against emotionally driven upstream indirect reciprocity," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 542-558.
- Schnedler, Wendelin, 2022. "The Broken Chain: Evidence against Emotionally Driven Upstream Indirect Reciprocity," IZA Discussion Papers 15732, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Schnedler, Wendelin, 2022.
"The broken chain: evidence against emotionally driven upstream indirect reciprocity,"
EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 136, pages 542-558.
- Schnedler, Wendelin, 2022. "The broken chain: Evidence against emotionally driven upstream indirect reciprocity," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 542-558.
- Schnedler, Wendelin, 2022. "The Broken Chain: Evidence against Emotionally Driven Upstream Indirect Reciprocity," IZA Discussion Papers 15732, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Wendelin Schneder & Nina Lucia Stephan, 2018. "Revisiting a remedy against the chain of unkindness," Working Papers Dissertations 45, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
- Gächter, Simon & Gerhards, Leonie & Nosenzo, Daniele, 2017.
"The importance of peers for compliance with norms of fair sharing,"
European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 72-86.
- Simon Gaechter & Leonie Gerhards & Daniele Nosenzo, 2015. "The importance of peers for compliance with norms of fair sharing," Discussion Papers 2015-23, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Simon Gaechter & Leonie Gerhards & Daniele Nosenzo, 2017. "The Importance of Peers for Compliance with Norms of Fair Sharing," CESifo Working Paper Series 6497, CESifo.
- Gächter, Simon & Gerhards, Leonie & Nosenzo, Daniele, 2015. "The Importance of Peers for Compliance with Norms of Fair Sharing," IZA Discussion Papers 9615, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Erik O. Kimbrough & Alexander Vostroknutov, 2016.
"Norms Make Preferences Social,"
Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 608-638, June.
- Erik O. Kimbrough & Alexander Vostroknutov, 2016. "Norms Make Preferences Social," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 608-638.
- Erik O. Kimbrough & Alexander Vostroknutov, 2013. "Norms Make Preferences Social," Discussion Papers dp13-01, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.
- Erik Kimbrough & Alexander Vostroknutov, 2014. "Norms Make Preferences Social," Discussion Papers dp14-06, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.
- Anna Dreber & Tore Ellingsen & Magnus Johannesson & David Rand, 2013.
"Do people care about social context? Framing effects in dictator games,"
Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 16(3), pages 349-371, September.
- Dreber, Anna & Ellingsen, Tore & Johannesson, Magnus & Rand, David, 2011. "Do People Care about Social Context? Framing Effects in Dictator Games," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 738, Stockholm School of Economics.
- Sebastian J. Goerg & David Rand & Gari Walkowitz, 2020.
"Framing effects in the prisoner’s dilemma but not in the dictator game,"
Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 6(1), pages 1-12, June.
- Sebastian Goerg & David Rand & Gari Walkowitz, 2017. "Framing effects in the Prisoner's Dilemma but not in the Dictator Game," Working Papers wp2017_02_01, Department of Economics, Florida State University.
- Fabbri, Marco & Carbonara, Emanuela, 2017. "Social influence on third-party punishment: An experiment," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 204-230.
- Maria Vittoria Levati & Chiara Nardi, 2019. "The power of words in a petty corruption experiment," Working Papers 18/2019, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
- Peter G. Moffatt & Graciela Zevallos, 2021.
"A Kuhn–Tucker model for behaviour in dictator games,"
Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 7(2), pages 226-243, December.
- Peter G Moffatt & Graciela Zevallos-Porles, 2020. "A Kuhn-Tucker Model for Behaviour in Dictator Games," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 20-03, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
- Simon Gächter & Daniele Nosenzo & Martin Sefton, 2013.
"Peer Effects In Pro-Social Behavior: Social Norms Or Social Preferences?,"
Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 11(3), pages 548-573, June.
- Simon Gaechter & Daniele Nosenzo & Martin Sefton, 2010. "Peer Effects In Pro-Social Behavior: Social Norms Or Social Preferences?," Discussion Papers 2010-23, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Simon Gachter & Daniele Nosenzo & Martin Sefton, 2012. "Peer Effects in Pro-Social Behaviour: Social Norms or Social Preferences?," Discussion Papers 2012-01, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Gächter, Simon & Nosenzo, Daniele & Sefton, Martin, 2012. "Peer Effects in Pro-Social Behavior: Social Norms or Social Preferences?," IZA Discussion Papers 6345, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Felix Koelle & Lukas Wenner, 2018. "Present-Biased Generosity: Time Inconsistency across Individual and Social Contexts," Discussion Papers 2018-02, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Heim, Réka & Huber, Jürgen, 2019. "Leading-by-example and third-party punishment: Experimental evidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 24(C).
- Mostafa Shahen & Koji Kotani & Tatsuyoshi Saijo, 2020. "How do individuals behave in the intergenerational sustainability dilemma? A strategy method experiment," Working Papers SDES-2020-1, Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management, revised May 2020.
- Marius Alt & Carlo Gallier & Achim Schlüter & Katherine Nelson & Eva Anggraini, 2018. "Giving to versus Taking from In- and Out-Group Members," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-14, August.
- Subhasish M. Chowdhury & Joo Young Jeon & Bibhas Saha, 2017.
"Gender Differences in the Giving and Taking Variants of the Dictator Game,"
Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 84(2), pages 474-483, October.
- Subhasish M. Chowdhury & Joo Young Jeon & Bibhas Saha, 2016. "Gender differences in the giving and taking variants of the dictator game," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 14-09R, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
- Korenok, Oleg & Millner, Edward L. & Razzolini, Laura, 2018.
"Taking aversion,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 397-403.
- Korenok Oleg & Edward L. Millner & Laura Razzolini, 2017. "Taking Aversion," Working Papers 1702, VCU School of Business, Department of Economics.
- Andreas Bergh & Philipp C Wichardt, 2022. "Mine or ours? Unintended framing effects in dictator games," Rationality and Society, , vol. 34(1), pages 78-95, February.
- Becker, Johannes & Hopp, Daniel & Süß, Karolin, 2020. "How altruistic is indirect reciprocity? - Evidence from gift-exchange games in the lab," VfS Annual Conference 2020 (Virtual Conference): Gender Economics 224592, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
- Johannes Becker & Daniel Hopp & Karolin Süß, 2020. "How Altruistic Is Indirect Reciprocity? - Evidence from Gift-Exchange Games in the Lab," CESifo Working Paper Series 8423, CESifo.
- Sabrina Jeworrek & Joschka Waibel, 2021. "Unethical employee behavior against coworkers following unkind management treatment: An experimental analysis," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(5), pages 1220-1234, July.
More about this item
Keywords
experimental economics; chain of unkindness; emotional closure; cooling down;
All these keywords.JEL classification:
- D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
- C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
- D03 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-CBE-2020-04-27 (Cognitive and Behavioural Economics)
- NEP-EXP-2020-04-27 (Experimental Economics)
- NEP-HAP-2020-04-27 (Economics of Happiness)
- NEP-ORE-2020-04-27 (Operations Research)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:215708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.