IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ecoapn/41.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bedeutung der Telearbeit aktuell und nach der COVID-19 Pandemie

Author

Listed:
  • Schwarzbauer, Wolfgang
  • Wolf, Martin

Abstract

Die im Rahmen der Bekämpfung der COVID-19 Pandemie restriktiven Maßnahmen vieler Regierungen bewirkten eine Erhöhung der Telearbeitsquote. Auch in Österreich führte dies zu einem Anstieg, im April 2020 sogar stärker als im EU-Durchschnitt. Aktuell ist der Nutzen von Telearbeit gerade vor dem Hintergrund der Erfahrungen im Frühjahr 2020 wohl weitestgehend unbestritten. Relevant ist jedoch die Frage, inwiefern es auch attraktiv für Unternehmen sein kann, Home-Office mittel- bis langfristig in verstärktem Ausmaß einzusetzen. Wesentlich hierfür ist der Effekt auf die Produktivität. Telearbeit kann die Produktivität von Unternehmen und damit der Gesamtwirtschaft steigern. Dies ist aber keineswegs allgemein gültig, sondern hängt von der Art der Tätigkeit, vom Umfang der Zeit, in derer von zuhause aus gearbeitet wird, und nicht zuletzt vom Individuum an sich ab. Deshalb kann Telearbeit nicht als Allheilmittel zur Steigerung der allgemeinen Produktivität gesehen werden, vielmehr sollte sie zielgerichtet in einzelnen Teilen von Unternehmen produktivitätssteigernd eingesetzt werden. Aus diesem Grund kann wohl ein allgemeiner Trend hin zu mehr Home-Office branchenunabhängig erwartet werden. Da Telearbeit zudem ein unternehmensspezifisches Instrument ist, wäre es zudem nicht zielführend eine branchenweite Regelung dafür oder dagegen anzustreben. Dennoch besteht aktuell hinsichtlich der Bedingungen für Telearbeit noch Handlungsbedarf, damit es Unternehmen gelingen kann, erwartbare Produktivitätseffekte in Zukunft auch tatsächlich zu realisieren. Diese umfassen eine kosteneffiziente und ökonomisch sinnvolle Forcierung des Ausbaus des Breitbandnetzes, auch und vor allem in ländlichen Gebieten. Ein weiterer Punkt, der eng in Zusammenhang mit technischen, aber auch rechtlichen Aspekten steht, ist jener der Datensicherheit. Hier sind zusätzliche Investitionen in Datensysteme und -sicherheit seitens der Unternehmen notwendig. Ein gewisses Kostenrisiko ergibt sich für Unternehmen auch aus arbeitsrechtlichen Vorschriften, vor allem, weil diese derzeit in manchen Punkten noch nicht klar sind. Hier ist allerdings Vorsicht geboten, da der Einsatz von der unternehmensspezifischen Struktur abhängt und somit bei branchenweiten Regelungen negative Folgen entstehen können.

Suggested Citation

  • Schwarzbauer, Wolfgang & Wolf, Martin, 2020. "Bedeutung der Telearbeit aktuell und nach der COVID-19 Pandemie," Policy Notes 41, EcoAustria – Institute for Economic Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ecoapn:41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/227421/1/ecoaustria-pn41.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas Bloom & James Liang & John Roberts & Zhichun Jenny Ying, 2015. "Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 130(1), pages 165-218.
    2. Erik Brynjolfsson & John J. Horton & Adam Ozimek & Daniel Rock & Garima Sharma & Hong-Yi TuYe, 2020. "COVID-19 and Remote Work: An Early Look at US Data," NBER Working Papers 27344, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Glenn Dutcher, E., 2012. "The effects of telecommuting on productivity: An experimental examination. The role of dull and creative tasks," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 355-363.
    4. Giovanis, Eleftherios, 2015. "Do the Flexible Employment Arrangements Increase Job Satisfaction and the Loyalty of the Employees? An Evidence from Great Britain," MPRA Paper 68669, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Giovanis, Eleftherios, 2015. "Flexible Employment Arrangements and Workplace Performance," MPRA Paper 68670, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Lutz Gschwind & Oscar Vargas, 2019. "Telework and its effects in Europe," Chapters, in: Jon C. Messenger (ed.), Telework in the 21st Century, chapter 1, pages 36-75, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Kazekami, Sachiko, 2020. "Mechanisms to improve labor productivity by performing telework," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Briglauer, Wolfgang & Stocker, Volker, 2020. "Bedeutung digitaler Infrastrukturen und Dienste und Maßnahmen zur Förderung der Resilienz in Krisenzeiten," Policy Notes 42, EcoAustria – Institute for Economic Research.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Masayuki Morikawa, 2022. "Work‐from‐home productivity during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Evidence from Japan," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 60(2), pages 508-527, April.
    2. Morikawa, Masayuki, 2021. "Work-from-Home Productivity during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Surveys of Employees and Employers," SSPJ Discussion Paper Series DP20-007, Service Sector Productivity in Japan: Determinants and Policies, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    3. Kawaguchi, Daiji & Motegi, Hiroyuki, 2021. "Who can work from home? The roles of job tasks and HRM practices," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    4. MORIKAWA Masayuki, 2020. "Productivity of Working from Home during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from an Employee Survey," Discussion papers 20073, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    5. Masayuki Morikawa, 2023. "Productivity dynamics of remote work during the COVID‐19 pandemic," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(3), pages 317-331, July.
    6. Julia Darby & Stuart McIntyre & Graeme Roy, 2022. "What can analysis of 47 million job advertisements tell us about how opportunities for homeworking are evolving in the United Kingdom?," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 281-302, July.
    7. Christian Kagerl & Julia Starzetz, 2023. "Working from home for good? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic and what this means for the future of work," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 229-265, January.
    8. Toshihiro Okubo, 2024. "Non‐routine tasks and ICT tools in telework," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 38(2), pages 177-202, June.
    9. Fatih YEGUL & Atif ACIKGOZ & Zaur KAZIMOV, 2022. "Impact Of Working From Home On Productivity & Performance, Evidence From North American Logistics Industry During Covid-19 Pandemic," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2(2), pages 289-303, December.
    10. A. Cetrulo & D. Guarascio & M. E. Virgillito, 2022. "Working from home and the explosion of enduring divides: income, employment and safety risks," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 39(2), pages 345-402, July.
    11. Allstrin, Susanna & Grafström, Jonas & Stern, Charlotta & Weidenstedt, Linda, 2022. "Managing Work from Anywhere: Six Points to Consider for HR Professionals," Ratio Working Papers 357, The Ratio Institute.
    12. Deole, Sumit S. & Deter, Max & Huang, Yue, 2023. "Home sweet home: Working from home and employee performance during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    13. Arntz, Melanie & Ben Yahmed, Sarra & Berlingieri, Francesco, 2022. "Working from home, hours worked and wages: Heterogeneity by gender and parenthood," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    14. Okubo, Toshihiro, 2022. "Telework in the spread of COVID-19," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    15. Pabilonia, Sabrina Wulff & Vernon, Victoria, 2020. "Telework and Time Use in the United States," IZA Discussion Papers 13260, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. MORIKAWA Masayuki, 2021. "Productivity of Working from Home during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Panel Data Analysis," Discussion papers 21078, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    17. Künn, Steffen & Seel, Christian & Zegners, Dainis, 2020. "Cognitive Performance in the Home Office - Evidence from Professional Chess," Research Memorandum 021, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    18. Sabrina Wulff Pabilonia & Victoria Vernon, 2022. "Telework, Wages, and Time Use in the United States," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 687-734, September.
    19. Kosteas, Vasilios D. & Renna, Francesco & Scicchitano, Sergio, 2022. "Covid-19 and Working from Home: toward a "new normal"?," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1013, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    20. KITAGAWA Ritsu & KURODA Sachiko & OKUDAIRA Hiroko & OWAN Hideo, 2021. "Working from Home: Its Effects on Productivity and Mental Health," Discussion papers 21024, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ecoapn:41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecoauat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.