IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uto/cesmep/200904.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A historical reconstruction of the connections between the Viennese neopositivists and the American pragmatists: economic theory in the project for the International Encyclopaedia of Unified Science

Author

Abstract

Persuaded by the fact that the philosophical debate in Vienna during the 1930s deeply influenced the subsequent American developments of economic theory, my purpose is to reconstruct, from a historical and theoretical point of view, how Austrian interests in economics (which spread in the interwar period) moved to the USA, and what the subsequent developments were. From a historical point of view, I shall focus on the genesis of the International Encyclopaedia of Unified Science promoted by philosophers belonging to the Vienna Circle (Otto Neurath, Rudolph Carnap and Philipp Frank) and American pragmatists (John Dewey and, above all, Charles Morris) between 1938 and 1969. From a theoretical point of view, I shall focus on the development of economic theory within this project, which was regarded as the most important outcome of logical positivism or new empiricism, this being the common philosophical outlook that they shared. The aim of this paper is to show how the original meaning of economics (as formulated by Neurath) within the Vienna Circle was changed in its transition from Vienna to the USA (when the International Encyclopaedia was organized) and was finally radically transformed in the American context during the following decades.

Suggested Citation

  • Becchio Giandomenica, 2009. "A historical reconstruction of the connections between the Viennese neopositivists and the American pragmatists: economic theory in the project for the International Encyclopaedia of Unified Science," CESMEP Working Papers 200904, University of Turin.
    • Handle: RePEc:uto:cesmep:200904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cesmep.unito.it/WP/2009/4_WP_Cesmep.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malcolm Rutherford, 2004. "Institutional Economics at Columbia University," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 36(1), pages 31-78, Spring.
    2. Giandomenica Becchio, 2008. "The complex role of Karl Menger in the Viennese economic theory," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 21(1), pages 61-79, March.
    3. Punzo, Lionello F., 1991. "The School of Mathematical Formalism and the Viennese Circle of Mathematical Economists," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Earlene Craver, 1986. "The Emigration of the Austrian Economists," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 18(1), pages 1-32, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Blog mentions

    As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
    1. Economics and Positivism
      by Nicholas Gruen in Club Troppo on 2009-04-15 20:54:02

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giandomenica Becchio, 2013. "Economics in the International Encyclopaedia of Unified Science," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(2), pages 145-153.
    2. Móczár, József, 2017. "Ergodic Versus Uncertain Financial Processes – Part II: Neoclassical and Institutional Economics," Public Finance Quarterly, Corvinus University of Budapest, vol. 62(4), pages 478-501.
    3. Arthur Brackmann Netto, 2017. "The Double Edge of Case-Studies: A Frame-Based Definition of Economic Models," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2017_21, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    4. Leonid Krasnozhon & Mykola Bunyk, 2018. "The role of the German Historical School in the development of Mises’s thought," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 31(3), pages 343-357, September.
    5. Hansjoerg Klausinger, 2005. "The Austrian School of Economics and the Gold Standard Mentality in Austrian Economic Policy in the 1930s," Method and Hist of Econ Thought 0501001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Visser, H., 1988. "Austrian thinking on international economics," Serie Research Memoranda 0001, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    7. Roberto Marchionatti & Fiorenzo Mornati, 2016. "Economic Theories in Competition - A New Narrative of the Debate on the General Economic Equilibrium Theory in the 1930s," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 63(5), pages 503-523.
    8. K. Vela Velupillai, 2016. "Seven Kinds of Computable and Constructive Infelicities in Economics," New Mathematics and Natural Computation (NMNC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(03), pages 219-239, November.
    9. Christ Kevin, 2018. "A Measure of Judgments – Wilhelm Röpke’s Methodological Heresy," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 69(1), pages 35-50, July.
    10. McGoun, Elton G., 1995. "Machomatics in egonomics," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 4(2-3), pages 185-199.
    11. Stefan Kolev & Erwin Dekker, 2023. "Carl Menger’s Smithian contributions to German political economy," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 36(2), pages 247-269, June.
    12. Claire Wright & Simon Ville, 2017. "The Evolution of an Intellectual Community Through the Words of Its Founders: Recollections of Australia's Economic History Field," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57(3), pages 345-367, November.
    13. Janek Wasserman, 2020. "Science lost, science found in the post WWII Austrian economics movement: The case of Emil Kauder," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 33(1), pages 107-120, March.
    14. Hansjoerg Klausinger, 2014. "Academic Anti-Semitism and the Austrian School: Vienna, 1918–1945," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 42(2), pages 191-204, June.
    15. Mathieu Marion, 2005. "Sraffa and Wittgenstein: Physicalism and constructivism," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 381-406.
    16. Móczár, József, 2006. "Arrow-Debreu-modell és a Kornai-kritika harminc év után [The Arrow-Debreu Model and Kornai s critique, thirty years after]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 175-194.
    17. Giandomenica Becchio, 2008. "The complex role of Karl Menger in the Viennese economic theory," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 21(1), pages 61-79, March.
    18. Roberto Marchionatti Author-Email: roberto.marchionatti@unito.it & Fiorenzo Mornati Author-Email: fiorenzo.mornati@unito.it, 2016. "Economic Theories in Competition A New Narrative of the Debate on the General Economic Equilibrium Theory in the 1930s," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 63(5), pages 503-523, December.
    19. Malcolm Rutherford, 2010. "Chicago Economics and Institutionalism," Chapters, in: Ross B. Emmett (ed.), The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Becchio Giandomenica, 2009. "Ethics and economics in Karl Menger: how did social sciences cope with Hilbertism," CESMEP Working Papers 200905, University of Turin.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uto:cesmep:200904. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Piero Cavaleri or Marina Grazioli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cmtorit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.