IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ucl/cepeob/32.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Higher Education funding: what's the problem and what are the potential solutions?

Author

Listed:
  • Gill Wyness

    (UCL Centre for Education Policy and Equalising Opportunities)

  • Richard Murphy

    (Department of Economics, University of Texas at Austin)

Abstract

England's once world-leading Higher Education (HE) system has become increasingly fragile over the last decade, with students suffering from real financial hardship, and some universities rumoured to be on the verge of collapse. Back in 2012, it was all looking so good. While the near-threefold hike in tuition fees (from £3,000 per year to £9,000 per year) implemented that year was controversial, the income-contingent loan system at its heart ensured that students from any background could go to university, and universities were adequately funded. Along with our colleague Judith Scott-Clayton, we evaluated the 2012 system in our paper The end of free college in England (Murphy et al., 2019) in which we studied the system's impact on three key measures of success: enrolments, equity and funding per student. We showed that enrolments had held up in the face of the significant fee increase, and while the gap in participation between rich and poor students remained stubbornly wide, fears of a collapse in enrolment among disadvantaged students failed to materialise. Moreover, university funding per head, which had fallen to dangerous levels in the years leading up to the reforms, was slowly beginning to recover. The success of the system (by these measures at least) came down to i) injecting cash into the system through tuition fees and, ii) the well-designed income contingent loans system, which ensured that no student had to pay upfront fees, and everyone had enough money to live on due to generous government-backed maintenance loans on offer. The system protected against key market failures --- credit constraints, risk and uncertainty and debt aversion -- an economist's dream. So where did it all go wrong? In short, with the government's decision not to index-link tuition fees and maintenance loans. The tuition fee cap has only been allowed to increase once, by just £250 a year, since 2012. The net result is that it is now worth around 30% less than it was in 2012. This is challenging for universities, which rely on fees as a key component of their income. And it's equally difficult for students --- maintenance loans --- the key source of income for living costs --- have not kept up with the UK's high rate of inflation, causing student hardship.

Suggested Citation

  • Gill Wyness & Richard Murphy, 2024. "Higher Education funding: what's the problem and what are the potential solutions?," CEPEO Briefing Note Series 32, UCL Centre for Education Policy and Equalising Opportunities, revised Oct 2024.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucl:cepeob:32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec-cepeo.ucl.ac.uk/cepeob/cepeobn32.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2024
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    higher education finance;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucl:cepeob:32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jake Anders (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/epucluk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.