IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tse/wpaper/129835.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Foundation for Universalisation in Games

Author

Listed:
  • Salonia, Enrico Mattia

Abstract

Revealed preference theory equates choices with preferences over the consequences these choices induce. Nevertheless, if a decision criterion prescribes an act for reasons unrelated to its consequences, the inference drawn regarding preferences can be misleading. I study the behaviour of non-consequentialist individuals who have preferences for universalisation. They choose the action that, in a counterfactual scenario where it is also chosen by everyone else, leads to their preferred consequences. I develop a model for individuals who value their choices in light of the counterfactual consequences they induce. Choices are interpreted as revealing a preference for counterfactual consequences. I impose axioms to single out the most prominent models of universalisation, compare them, highlight and arguably overcome their limitations. I propose a unifying model of universalisation inspired by the equal sacrifice principle.

Suggested Citation

  • Salonia, Enrico Mattia, 2024. "A Foundation for Universalisation in Games," TSE Working Papers 24-1586, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    • Handle: RePEc:tse:wpaper:129835
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.tse-fr.eu/sites/default/files/TSE/documents/doc/wp/2024/wp_tse_1586.pdf
    File Function: Full Text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomson,William, 2019. "How to Divide When There Isn't Enough," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107194625, September.
    2. Thomson,William, 2019. "How to Divide When There Isn't Enough," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781316646441, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Péter Csóka & P. Jean-Jacques Herings, 2023. "An Axiomatization of the Pairwise Netting Proportional Rule in Financial Networks," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 2301, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    2. Gong, Doudou & Dietzenbacher, Bas & Peters, Hans, 2022. "A random arrival rule for NTU-bankruptcy problems," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    3. Flores-Szwagrzak, Karol & Østerdal, Lars Peter, 2024. "Rationalizing Sharing Rules," Working Papers 17-2024, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Economics.
    4. Gong, Doudou & Dietzenbacher, Bas, 2024. "Equal treatment of unsatisfied agents," Research Memorandum 010, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    5. José-Manuel Giménez-Gómez & Josep E. Peris & Begoña Subiza, 2022. "A claims problem approach to the cost allocation of a minimum cost spanning tree," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2785-2801, July.
    6. Victor Ginsburgh & Juan D. Moreno‐Ternero, 2022. "Brexit and multilingualism in the European Union," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 708-731, May.
    7. Sebastian Cano-Berlanga & María-José Solís-Baltodano & Cori Vilella, 2023. "The Art of Sharing Resources: How to Distribute Water during a Drought Period," Games, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Duro, Juan Antonio & Giménez-Gómez, José-Manuel & Vilella, Cori, 2020. "The allocation of CO2 emissions as a claims problem," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    9. Echenique, Federico & Miralles, Antonio & Zhang, Jun, 2021. "Fairness and efficiency for allocations with participation constraints," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    10. Stefano Moretti & Raja Trabelsi, 2021. "A Double-Weighted Bankruptcy Method to Allocate CO 2 Emissions Permits," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, October.
    11. Zou, Zhengxing & Tan, Zhibin, 2023. "Axiomatizations of convex compromise rules for redistribution of non-negative income," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    12. José-Manuel Giménez-Gómez & M. Carmen Marco-Gil & Juan-Francisco Sánchez-García, 2022. "New empirical insights into conflicting claims problems," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 13(4), pages 709-738, December.
    13. Zhengxing Zou & René van den Brink & Yukihiko Funaki, 2024. "On weighted-egalitarian values for cooperative games," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 24-021/II, Tinbergen Institute.
    14. José-Manuel Giménez-Gómez & Foroogh Salekpay & Cori Vilella, 2023. "How to distribute the European regional development funds through a combination of egalitarian allocations: the constrained equal losses min," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8, December.
    15. Bas Dietzenbacher, 2023. "Generalizing the constrained equal awards rule," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 95(1), pages 131-150, July.
    16. Duro Moreno, Juan Antonio & Giménez-Gómez, José Manuel & Sánchez-Soriano, Joaquín & Vilella Bach, Misericòrdia, 2022. "Allocating remaining carbon budgets and mitigation costs," Working Papers 2072/535074, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    17. Isaac Elishakoff & Avraham N. Dancygier, 2023. "An explicit solution to a game-theoretic bankruptcy problem," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(9), pages 1-16, September.
    18. Chatterjee, Siddharth & Ertemel, Sinan & Kumar, Rajnish, 2023. "Rationing rules for risky claims," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    19. Salekpay, Foroogh & Giménez-Gómez, José Manuel, 2022. "How to distribute the ERDF funds through a combination of egalitarian allocations: the CELmin," Working Papers 2072/535073, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    20. Salmaso, Pietro, 2024. "Welfare maximization in stable sharing services," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tse:wpaper:129835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tsetofr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.