IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tin/wpaper/20210004.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Robust Estimation of Probit Models with Endogeneity

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea A. Naghi

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam)

  • Máté Váradi

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam)

  • Mikhail Zhelonkin

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam)

Abstract

Probit models with endogenous regressors are commonly used models in economics and other social sciences. Yet, the robustness properties of parametric estimators in these models have not been formally studied. In this paper, we derive the influence functions of the endogenous probit model’s classical estimators (the maximum likelihood and the two-step estimator) and prove their non-robustness to small but harmful deviations from distributional assumptions. We propose a procedure to obtain a robust alternative estimator, prove its asymptotic normality and provide its asymptotic variance. A simple robust test for endogeneity is also constructed. We compare the performance of the robust and classical estimators in Monte Carlo simulations with different types of contamination scenarios. The use of our estimator is illustrated in several empirical applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea A. Naghi & Máté Váradi & Mikhail Zhelonkin, 2021. "Robust Estimation of Probit Models with Endogeneity," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 21-004/III, Tinbergen Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20210004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.tinbergen.nl/21004.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pia M. Orrenius & Madeline Zavodny, 2015. "Does Immigration Affect Whether US Natives Major in Science and Engineering?," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 33(S1), pages 79-108.
    2. Richard W. Blundell & James L. Powell, 2004. "Endogeneity in Semiparametric Binary Response Models," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 71(3), pages 655-679.
    3. Stéphane Bonhomme & Martin Weidner, 2018. "Minimizing sensitivity to model misspecification," CeMMAP working papers CWP59/18, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    4. Duncan, Gregory M., 1987. "A simplified approach to M-estimation with application to two-stage estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 373-389, March.
    5. Giorgio Brunello & Daniele Fabbri & Margherita Fort, 2013. "The Causal Effect of Education on Body Mass: Evidence from Europe," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(1), pages 195-223.
    6. White, Halbert, 1980. "A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 48(4), pages 817-838, May.
    7. Zhelonkin, Mikhail & Genton, Marc G. & Ronchetti, Elvezio, 2012. "On the robustness of two-stage estimators," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(4), pages 726-732.
    8. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2010. "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262232588, April.
    9. Rivers, Douglas & Vuong, Quang H., 1988. "Limited information estimators and exogeneity tests for simultaneous probit models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 347-366, November.
    10. Gabriela V. Cohen Freue & Hernan Ortiz-Molina & Ruben H. Zamar, 2013. "A Natural Robustification of the Ordinary Instrumental Variables Estimator," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(3), pages 641-650, September.
    11. Cantoni E. & Ronchetti E., 2001. "Robust Inference for Generalized Linear Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1022-1030, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yingying Dong & Arthur Lewbel, 2015. "A Simple Estimator for Binary Choice Models with Endogenous Regressors," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1-2), pages 82-105, February.
    2. Manuel Denzer, 2019. "Estimating Causal Effects in Binary Response Models with Binary Endogenous Explanatory Variables - A Comparison of Possible Estimators," Working Papers 1916, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    3. Elia Lapenta, 2022. "A Bootstrap Specification Test for Semiparametric Models with Generated Regressors," Papers 2212.11112, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    4. William Liu, 2023. "A Theory Guide to Using Control Functions to Instrument Hazard Models," Papers 2312.03165, arXiv.org.
    5. Walter Beckert, 2019. "A Note on Specification Testing in Some Structural Regression Models," CeMMAP working papers CWP22/19, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    6. Hoderlein, Stefan & Sherman, Robert, 2015. "Identification and estimation in a correlated random coefficients binary response model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 188(1), pages 135-149.
    7. Stéphane Bonhomme & Martin Weidner, 2019. "Posterior average effects," CeMMAP working papers CWP43/19, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    8. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M., 2014. "Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation and testing for nonlinear models with endogenous explanatory variables," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 182(1), pages 226-234.
    9. Kajal Lahiri & Liu Yang, 2021. "Estimating Endogenous Ordered Response Panel Data Models with an Application to Income Gradient in Child Health," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 83(2), pages 207-243, November.
    10. Dakyung Seong, 2022. "Binary response model with many weak instruments," Papers 2201.04811, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    11. Arthur Lewbel & Yingying Dong & Thomas Tao Yang, 2012. "Comparing features of convenient estimators for binary choice models with endogenous regressors," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(3), pages 809-829, August.
    12. Mikhail Zhelonkin & Marc G. Genton & Elvezio Ronchetti, 2016. "Robust inference in sample selection models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(4), pages 805-827, September.
    13. Richard Bluhm & Martin Gassebner & Sarah Langlotz & Paul Schaudt, 2021. "Fueling conflict? (De)escalation and bilateral aid," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), pages 244-261, March.
    14. Walter Beckert, 2020. "A Note on Specification Testing in Some Structural Regression Models," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 82(3), pages 686-695, June.
    15. David T. Frazier & Eric Renault & Lina Zhang & Xueyan Zhao, 2020. "Weak Identification in Discrete Choice Models," Papers 2011.06753, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2021.
    16. Ilhom Abdulloev, 2018. "Job dissatisfaction and migration: evidence from Tajikistan," IZA Journal of Migration and Development, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 8(1), pages 1-27, December.
    17. Hongxiu Li, 2017. "Innovation as Adaptation to Natural Disasters," Working Papers 1709, University of Waterloo, Department of Economics, revised Nov 2017.
    18. Arthur Lewbel & Yingying Dong & Thomas Tao Yang, 2012. "Viewpoint: Comparing features of convenient estimators for binary choice models with endogenous regressors," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 45(3), pages 809-829, August.
    19. Stéphane Bonhomme & Martin Weidner, 2020. "Posterior average effects," CeMMAP working papers CWP49/20, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    20. Anastasia Semykina & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2018. "Binary response panel data models with sample selection and self‐selection," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 179-197, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Binary outcomes; Probit model; Endogenous variable; Instrumental variable; Robust Estimation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C26 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Instrumental Variables (IV) Estimation
    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
    • C18 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Methodolical Issues: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20210004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tinbenl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.