IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tin/wpaper/20020102.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Speed Choice, Car Following Theory and Congestion Tolling

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Rouwendal

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Abstract

This paper provides a link between car following theory and the economic theoryof road congestion by means of a theory of speed choice. According to this theory speedchoice is based on a trade-off between the benefits (shorter travel time) and cost (higheraccident risk) of driving faster. Accident risk is related to the distance to the ‘leader’and by elaborating this relationship a number of car-following models can be derived fromthis theory of speed choice. Wit homogeneous traffic, steady state analysis leads to amodel that generalizes the conventional Pigou-Knight analysis: it has an endogenous speedchoice curve and requires the incorporation of accident risk in the value of travel time. Afurther generalization of this model to steady states with heterogeneous traffic ispossible and leads to the conclusion that first best tolls will in general requiredifferentiation over groups of drivers. Finally a general bottleneck model is discussedthat contains Vickrey’s (1969) and Verhoef’s (2002) versions as special cases. This results in aclarification of Verhoef’s finding that implementation of the optimal Vickrey toll canresult in a deterioration of welfare.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Rouwendal, 2002. "Speed Choice, Car Following Theory and Congestion Tolling," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 02-102/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20020102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.tinbergen.nl/02102.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arnott, Richard & Kraus, Marvin, 1998. "When are anonymous congestion charges consistent with marginal cost pricing?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 45-64, January.
    2. Jan Rouwendal & Erik Verhoef & Piet Rietveld & Bert Zwart, 2002. "A Stochastic Model of Congestion Caused by Speed Differences," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 36(3), pages 407-445, September.
    3. Leslie C. Edie, 1961. "Car-Following and Steady-State Theory for Noncongested Traffic," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(1), pages 66-76, February.
    4. Robert E. Chandler & Robert Herman & Elliott W. Montroll, 1958. "Traffic Dynamics: Studies in Car Following," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 165-184, April.
    5. G. F. Newell, 1961. "Nonlinear Effects in the Dynamics of Car Following," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 209-229, April.
    6. Denos C. Gazis & Robert Herman & Renfrey B. Potts, 1959. "Car-Following Theory of Steady-State Traffic Flow," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 499-505, August.
    7. Verhoef, Erik T., 2001. "An Integrated Dynamic Model of Road Traffic Congestion Based on Simple Car-Following Theory: Exploring Hypercongestion," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 505-542, May.
    8. Newell, G. F., 2002. "A simplified car-following theory: a lower order model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 195-205, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng, Qixiu & Liu, Zhiyuan & Lin, Yuqian & Zhou, Xuesong (Simon), 2021. "An s-shaped three-parameter (S3) traffic stream model with consistent car following relationship," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 246-271.
    2. Zhang, H.M. & Kim, T., 2005. "A car-following theory for multiphase vehicular traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 385-399, June.
    3. Jabari, Saif Eddin & Zheng, Jianfeng & Liu, Henry X., 2014. "A probabilistic stationary speed–density relation based on Newell’s simplified car-following model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 205-223.
    4. Sun, Jie & Zheng, Zuduo & Sun, Jian, 2020. "The relationship between car following string instability and traffic oscillations in finite-sized platoons and its use in easing congestion via connected and automated vehicles with IDM based control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 58-83.
    5. Jin, Wen-Long, 2016. "On the equivalence between continuum and car-following models of traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 543-559.
    6. Tordeux, Antoine & Lassarre, Sylvain & Roussignol, Michel, 2010. "An adaptive time gap car-following model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(8-9), pages 1115-1131, September.
    7. Tian, Junfang & Li, Guangyu & Treiber, Martin & Jiang, Rui & Jia, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng, 2016. "Cellular automaton model simulating spatiotemporal patterns, phase transitions and concave growth pattern of oscillations in traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 560-575.
    8. Jiang, Rui & Hu, Mao-Bin & Zhang, H.M. & Gao, Zi-You & Jia, Bin & Wu, Qing-Song, 2015. "On some experimental features of car-following behavior and how to model them," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 338-354.
    9. Ponnu, Balaji & Coifman, Benjamin, 2015. "Speed-spacing dependency on relative speed from the adjacent lane: New insights for car following models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 74-90.
    10. Niek Baer & Richard J. Boucherie & Jan-Kees C. W. van Ommeren, 2019. "Threshold Queueing to Describe the Fundamental Diagram of Uninterrupted Traffic," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 585-596, March.
    11. Holland, E. N., 1998. "A generalised stability criterion for motorway traffic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 141-154, February.
    12. Kalathil, Dileep & Kurzhanskiy, Alex A. & Varaiya, Pravin, 2017. "Sustainable Operation of Arterial Networks," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt5js550jt, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    13. Wang, Xiao & Jiang, Rui & Li, Li & Lin, Yi-Lun & Wang, Fei-Yue, 2019. "Long memory is important: A test study on deep-learning based car-following model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 514(C), pages 786-795.
    14. Kai Nagel & Peter Wagner & Richard Woesler, 2003. "Still Flowing: Approaches to Traffic Flow and Traffic Jam Modeling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 681-710, October.
    15. Michael Z. F. Li, 2008. "A Generic Characterization of Equilibrium Speed-Flow Curves," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 220-235, May.
    16. Li, Xiaopeng & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2011. "Characterization of traffic oscillation propagation under nonlinear car-following laws," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1346-1361.
    17. Farhi, Nadir, 2024. "Piecewise-linear car-following with heterogeneous agent dynamics: Consensus and emerging collective behaviors," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 649(C).
    18. Bai, Lu & Wong, S.C. & Xu, Pengpeng & Chow, Andy H.F. & Lam, William H.K., 2021. "Calibration of stochastic link-based fundamental diagram with explicit consideration of speed heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 524-539.
    19. Yunze Wang & Ranran Xu & Ke Zhang, 2022. "A Car-Following Model for Mixed Traffic Flows in Intelligent Connected Vehicle Environment Considering Driver Response Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, September.
    20. Li, Xiaopeng & Wang, Xin & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2012. "Prediction and field validation of traffic oscillation propagation under nonlinear car-following laws," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 409-423.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Car following; congestion tolling; traffic speed; traffic heterogeneity.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R41 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion; Travel Time; Safety and Accidents; Transportation Noise
    • R48 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Government Pricing and Policy
    • D62 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Externalities

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20020102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tinbenl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.