IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/smo/scmowp/01280.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

On the Law and Economics of Arts: A Research Proposal

Author

Listed:
  • Julia M. Puaschunder

    (Columbia University, USA)

Abstract

Arts is as old as humankind and a worldwide phenomenon. A scientific investigation of arts, however, is rather seldom since the arts are oftentimes applied and touch on multiple disciplines. Arts production and consumption are perceived as less rational and tangible than classic goods and services. Neoclassical economics therefore hardly has any account of the commercialization of arts. The opening of the neoclassical economics model for behavioral aspects in the behavioral economics revolution has now paved the way to start researching the arts and surreal pricing mechanisms in the arts world. This paper is a call for research of arts from a Law and Economics perspective. Law and Economics offers ways to understand the value of arts in society and derive inferences on how to improve certain features and peculiarities of the arts market. A Behavioral Law and Economics perspective could help elucidate social welfare enhancement potential for the individual passive consumer of arts, the active arts market actors as well as economies and society as a whole, including future generations. With the growing commercialization of arts and rising use of arts as an unregulated collateral in the finance world, capturing the peculiar dynamics of arts markets holds unprecedented value. Legal recommendations could target at addressing market downfalls and risk management strategies in the arts world.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia M. Puaschunder, 2024. "On the Law and Economics of Arts: A Research Proposal," Scientia Moralitas Conference Proceedings 01280, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    • Handle: RePEc:smo:scmowp:01280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://scientiamoralitas.education/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/01280.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Rushton, 2001. "The Law and Economics of Artists' Inalienable Rights," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 25(4), pages 243-257, November.
    2. V.A. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (ed.), 2006. "Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture," Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 1, number 1, December.
    3. Victor Ginsburgh & David Throsby, 2006. "Handbook of the economics of art and culture," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/1673, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    4. Ennio E. Piano & Clara E. Piano, 2023. "Bargaining over Beauty: The Economics of Contracts in Renaissance Art Markets," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 66(2), pages 225-257.
    5. Hansmann, Henry & Santilli, Marina, 1997. "Authors' and Artists' Moral Rights: A Comparative Legal and Economic Analysis," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(1), pages 95-143, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melissa Boyle & Stacy Nazzaro & Debra O’Connor, 2010. "Moral rights protection for the visual arts," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 34(1), pages 27-44, February.
    2. Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz & Ana Valdivia, 2019. "Measuring and Exploiting the Impact of Exhibition Scheduling on Museum Attendance," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 761-779, October.
    3. Roberto Cellini & Tiziana Cuccia, 2013. "Museum and monument attendance and tourism flow: a time series analysis approach," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(24), pages 3473-3482, August.
    4. Sittichok Plaiphum & Roengchai Tansuchat, 2023. "Cultural Capital of Sea Salt Farming in Ban Laem District of Phetchaburi Province as per the Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-27, August.
    5. Francisco Alcalá & Miguel González‐Maestre, 2012. "Artistic Creation and Intellectual Property: A Professional Career Approach," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 633-672, September.
    6. Bertacchini, Enrico & Dalle Nogare, Chiara, 2014. "Public provision vs. outsourcing of cultural services: Evidence from Italian cities," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 168-182.
    7. Rubinstein Alexander, 2013. "Studying “Sponsored Goods” in Cultural Sector. Econometric Model of Baumol’s Disease," Creative and Knowledge Society, Sciendo, vol. 3(1), pages 28-48, July.
    8. Victor Ginsburgh, 2013. "Mark Blaug and the economics of the arts," Chapters, in: Marcel Boumans & Matthias Klaes (ed.), Mark Blaug: Rebel with Many Causes, chapter 15, pages 208-224, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Popovic, Milenko, 2009. "Dynamic Models of Arts Labor Supply," MPRA Paper 19397, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. David, Géraldine & Li, Yuexin & Oosterlinck, Kim & Renneboog, Luc, 2021. "Art in Times of Crisis," Discussion Paper 2021-026, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    11. Bruno S. Frey & Lasse Steiner, 2013. "World Heritage List," Chapters, in: Ilde Rizzo & Anna Mignosa (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Cultural Heritage, chapter 8, pages i-i, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Brunella Bruno & Emilia Garcia‐Appendini & Giacomo Nocera, 2018. "Experience and Brokerage in Asset Markets: Evidence from Art Auctions," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 47(4), pages 833-864, December.
    13. Oosterlinck, Kim & David, Géraldine & Huemer, Christian, 2019. "Art Dealers’ Inventory Strategy The case of Goupil, Boussod & Valadon from 1860 to 1914," CEPR Discussion Papers 13941, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Yao Cui & Izak Duenyas & Özge Şahin, 2014. "Should Event Organizers Prevent Resale of Tickets?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(9), pages 2160-2179, September.
    15. Fernández Blanco, Víctor & Prieto Rodríguez,Juan, 2009. "Análisis de los hábitos de lectura como una decisión económica/," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 27, pages 113-138, Abril.
    16. Ruth Towse, 2011. "Creativity," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse (ed.), A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition, chapter 18, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Samuel Cameron & Hendrik Sonnabend, 2020. "PricThe musical tribute band is a neglected topic in the field of economics. At first sight, it may seem to be a simple case of general copycatting which has been covered for other products and market," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(2), pages 890-900.
    18. Thomas Longden & David Throsby, 2021. "Non‐Pecuniary Rewards, Multiple Job‐Holding and the Labour Supply of Creative Workers: The Case of Book Authors," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 97(316), pages 24-44, March.
    19. Domenico Depalo & Silvia Fedeli, 2011. "Heterogeneity in the Cultural Expenditures of Municipalities Evidence from Italian Data (1998-2006)," Working Papers in Public Economics 139, University of Rome La Sapienza, Department of Economics and Law.
    20. Borowiecki, Karol Jan & Graddy, Kathryn, 2021. "Immigrant artists: Enrichment or displacement?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 785-797.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    arts; behavioral economics; commercialization of arts; cryptocurrencies; culture; non-fungible token (NFT); private goods; public goods; tickets; tokens;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:scmowp:01280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://rais.education/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.