IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iefpro/3205891.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Consumer Innovativeness And Information Seeking Behavior As Opposed To Risk Perceptions On Purchases Of Hi-Tec

Author

Listed:
  • Figen Ersoy

    (Anadolu University)

  • Nuri Calik

    (Turgut Ozal University, Turkey)

Abstract

This study intends to find out the consumer innovativeness and information seeking behavior which are assumed to be negatively correlated with consumer risk perceptions. A survey on 880 respondents who are selected via stratified sampling of which 863 are found eligible to be analyzed. The respondents are required to answer 50 questions of which five are related to demographic characteristics of these respondents. The rest 45 are statements which are designed to reflect the innovativeness and risk perception of the consumers which are two controversial issues... The study consists of five parts. The first part is an introduction where the scope and the purpose of the study are concisely stated. The second part relates to the theoretical background of the subject matter and the prior researches carried out so far. The third part deals with research methodology, basic premises and hypotheses attached to these premises. Research model and analyses take place in this section. Theoretical framework is built and a variable name is assigned to each of the question asked or proposition forwarded to the respondents of this survey. 45 statements or propositions given to the respondents are placed on a five-point Likert scale. The remaining five questions about demographic traits as age, gender, occupation, educational level and monthly income are placed either on a nominal or ratio scale with respect to the nature of the trait. Five research hypotheses are formulated in this section. The fourth part mainly deals with the results of the hypothesis tests and a factor analysis is applied to the data on hand. Here exploratory factor analysis reduces 45 variables to eight basic components as "Online shopping risks, technology readiness, risk avoidance, physical risk perception, consumer innovativeness, functional risk perception, information seeking behavior, and social risk perception. Cronbach's Alpha for scale reliability is (? = 0.731) and the sample adequacy ratio (KMO ) is 0.835. In addition non-parametric bivariate analysis in terms of Chi-Square is applied to test the hypotheses formulated in this respect. The fifth part is the conclusion where findings of this survey are listed.

Suggested Citation

  • Figen Ersoy & Nuri Calik, 2016. "Consumer Innovativeness And Information Seeking Behavior As Opposed To Risk Perceptions On Purchases Of Hi-Tec," Proceedings of Economics and Finance Conferences 3205891, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:sek:iefpro:3205891
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/5th-economics-finance-conference-miami/table-of-content/detail?cid=32&iid=006&rid=5891
    File Function: First version, 2016
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maw–Der Foo, 2011. "Emotions and Entrepreneurial Opportunity Evaluation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(2), pages 375-393, March.
    2. Midgley, David F & Dowling, Grahame R, 1993. "A Longitudinal Study of Product Form Innovation: The Interaction between Predispositions and Social Messages," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 19(4), pages 611-625, March.
    3. Forsythe, Sandra M. & Shi, Bo, 2003. "Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in Internet shopping," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 867-875, November.
    4. Daniel G. Goldstein & Eric J. Johnson & William F. Sharpe, 2008. "Choosing Outcomes versus Choosing Products: Consumer-Focused Retirement Investment Advice," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(3), pages 440-456, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maw–Der Foo & Marilyn A. Uy & Charles Murnieks, 2015. "Beyond Affective Valence: Untangling Valence and Activation Influences on Opportunity Identification," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(2), pages 407-431, March.
    2. Leonidas A. Zampetakis & Manolis Lerakis & Konstantinos Kafetsios & Vassilis S. Moustakis, 2016. "The moderating role of anticipated affective ambivalence in the formation of entrepreneurial intentions," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 815-838, September.
    3. Pepermans, Roland & Verleye, Gino & Van Cappellen, Sarah, 1996. "'Wallbanking', innovativeness and computer attitudes: 25-40-year-old ATM-users on the spot," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 731-748, December.
    4. Claudia BOBALCA, 2015. "The Loyal Customers’ Perception Regarding The Online Buying Process," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 7(2), pages 241-255, August.
    5. Kim, Jeeyeon & Kim, Mingyung & Choi, Jeonghye & Trivedi, Minakshi, 2019. "Offline social interactions and online shopping demand: Does the degree of social interactions matter?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 373-381.
    6. Hsu, Dan K. & Burmeister-Lamp, Katrin & Simmons, Sharon A. & Foo, Maw-Der & Hong, Michelle C. & Pipes, Jesse D., 2019. "“I know I can, but I don't fit”: Perceived fit, self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial intention," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 311-326.
    7. Stroe, Silvia & Sirén, Charlotta & Shepherd, Dean & Wincent, Joakim, 2020. "The dualistic regulatory effect of passion on the relationship between fear of failure and negative affect: Insights from facial expression analysis," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(4).
    8. Wei-Lun Chang & Li-Ming Chen & Takako Hashimoto, 2022. "Cashless Japan: Unlocking Influential Risk on Mobile Payment Service," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 1515-1528, October.
    9. Nicoleta-Dorina RACOLŢA-PAINA & Theodora Alexandra LUCA, 2011. "Nowadays Online Consumers' Rights And Interests. Case Study- The Romanian Educated Online Young Consumer," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 6(2), Summer.
    10. Gianluigi Guido & Cesare Amatulli & Andrea Sestino, 2020. "Elderly consumers and financial choices: A systematic review," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(3), pages 76-85, December.
    11. Hoffmann, Arvid O.I. & Post, Thomas, 2014. "Self-attribution bias in consumer financial decision-making: How investment returns affect individuals’ belief in skill," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 23-28.
    12. Chan, Chien Sheng Richard & Park, Haemin Dennis, 2013. "The influence of dispositional affect and cognition on venture investment portfolio concentration," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 397-412.
    13. Li, Chen & Swaminathan, Srinivasan & Kim, Junhee, 2021. "The role of marketing channels in consumers’ promotional point redemption decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 314-323.
    14. Hem C. Basnet & Ficawoyi Donou‐Adonsou, 2016. "Internet, consumer spending, and credit card balance: Evidence from US consumers," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 11-22, September.
    15. Faqih, Khaled M.S., 2016. "An empirical analysis of factors predicting the behavioral intention to adopt Internet shopping technology among non-shoppers in a developing country context: Does gender matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 140-164.
    16. Bernard, Carole & Chen, Jit Seng & Vanduffel, Steven, 2015. "Rationalizing investors’ choices," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 10-23.
    17. Gensler, Sonja & Leeflang, Peter & Skiera, Bernd, 2012. "Impact of online channel use on customer revenues and costs to serve: Considering product portfolios and self-selection," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 192-201.
    18. Tamar Balgiashvili, 2017. "Comparing Entrepreneurial Passion of Social and Commercial Entrepreneurs in the Czech Republic," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2017(4), pages 45-61.
    19. Alrawad, Mahmaod & Lutfi, Abdalwali & Alyatama, Sundus & Al Khattab, Adel & Alsoboa, Sliman S. & Almaiah, Mohammed Amin & Ramadan, Mujtaba Hashim & Arafa, Hussin Mostafa & Ahmed, Nazar Ali & Alsyouf, , 2023. "Assessing customers perception of online shopping risks: A structural equation modeling–based multigroup analysis," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    20. Augustine Yao Dzathor, 2013. "Do Business Demographics Matter to Nascent Venture Performance? A Longitudinal Evidence from the Kauffman Firm Survey," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 3(8), pages 44-56, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Consumer innovativeness; information seeking behavior; risk perception and risk avoidance; technology-proneness; functional and physical risks.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iefpro:3205891. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.