IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rug/rugwps/13-866.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An extended Huff-model for robustly benchmarking and predicting retail network performance

Author

Listed:
  • M. DE BEULE
  • D. VAN DEN POEL
  • N. VAN DE WEGHE

Abstract

spatial competition between stores of the same brand, brand attraction based on actual brand performance and spatially variable substitution. The model uses only publicly available or easily acquirable data as input, whereas model output is extensively validated on various levels. These levels include com- parison of modeled and real market shares on block, store and brand level for the Belgian food market. Results show that multi-objective optimization of model parameters yields comparable results on block level to other models in the literature but improved results on store and brand levels, thereby en- suring model robustness. This robustness also enables the application of the model for various business purposes as store location determination, lea et distribution optimization, store and store concept benchmarking, without loss of spatial generality.

Suggested Citation

  • M. De Beule & D. Van Den Poel & N. Van De Weghe, 2013. "An extended Huff-model for robustly benchmarking and predicting retail network performance," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 13/866, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    • Handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:13/866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wps-feb.ugent.be/Papers/wp_13_866.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dinesh Kumar Gauri & Janos Gabor Pauler & Minakshi Trivedi, 2009. "Benchmarking Performance in Retail Chains: An Integrated Approach," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 502-515, 05-06.
    2. Peter Davis, 2006. "Spatial competition in retail markets: movie theaters," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 37(4), pages 964-982, December.
    3. B Suman & P Kumar, 2006. "A survey of simulated annealing as a tool for single and multiobjective optimization," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(10), pages 1143-1160, October.
    4. Philippe A. Naert & Alain V. Bultez, 1975. "A Model of a Distribution Network Aggregate Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(10), pages 1102-1112, June.
    5. Peter Davis, 2006. "Spatial competition in retail markets: movie theaters," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 37(4), pages 964-982, December.
    6. Ghosh, Avijit, 1984. "Parameter nonstationarity in retail choice models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 425-436, December.
    7. Tommi Orpana & Jouko Lampinen, 2003. "Building Spatial Choice Models from Aggregate Data," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 319-348, May.
    8. Pauler, Gabor & Trivedi, Minakshi & Gauri, Dinesh Kumar, 2009. "Assessing store performance models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 349-359, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jay Mittal, 2017. "Valuing Visual Accessibility of Scenic Landscapes in a Single Family Housing Market: A Spatial Hedonic Approach," ERES eres2017_1, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    2. Wieland, Thomas, 2014. "Räumliches Einkaufsverhalten und Standortpolitik im Einzelhandel unter Berücksichtigung von Agglomerationseffekten: Theoretische Erklärungsansätze, modellanalytische Zugänge und eine empirisch-ökonome," MPRA Paper 77163, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Fildes, Robert & Ma, Shaohui & Kolassa, Stephan, 2019. "Retail forecasting: research and practice," MPRA Paper 89356, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Wieland, Thomas, 2015. "Nahversorgung im Kontext raumökonomischer Entwicklungen im Lebensmitteleinzelhandel: Konzeption und Durchführung einer GIS-gestützten Analyse der Strukturen des Lebensmitteleinzelhandels und der Nahve," MPRA Paper 77145, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura Nurski & Frank Verboven, 2016. "Exclusive Dealing as a Barrier to Entry? Evidence from Automobiles," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 83(3), pages 1156-1188.
    2. Amit Pazgal & David Soberman & Raphael Thomadsen, 2016. "Maximal or Minimal Differentiation in a Hotelling Market? A Fresh Perspective," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 3(1), pages 42-47, March.
    3. Luca Aguzzoni & Elena Argentesi & Lorenzo Ciari & Tomaso Duso & Massimo Tognoni, 2016. "Ex post Merger Evaluation in the U.K. Retail Market for Books," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(1), pages 170-200, March.
    4. Shaoling Chen & Susheng Wang & Haisheng Yang, 2015. "Spatial Competition and Interdependence in Strategic Decisions: Empirical Evidence from Franchising," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 91(2), pages 165-204, April.
    5. Peter Davis & Pasquale Schiraldi, 2014. "The flexible coefficient multinomial logit (FC-MNL) model of demand for differentiated products," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 45(1), pages 32-63, March.
    6. Martin Lábaj & Karol Morvay & Peter Silaniè & Christoph Weiss, 2014. "Market Structure in Transition: Entry and Competition in Slovakia," Department of Economic Policy Working Paper Series 005, Department of Economic Policy, Faculty of National Economy, University of Economics in Bratislava.
    7. Pereira, Pedro & Ribeiro, Tiago & Vareda, João, 2013. "Delineating markets for bundles with consumer level data: The case of triple-play," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 760-773.
    8. Katja Seim & Joel Waldfogel, 2013. "Public Monopoly and Economic Efficiency: Evidence from the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board's Entry Decisions," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(2), pages 831-862, April.
    9. Yun Jeong Choi & Jong-Hee Hahn & Hojung Kim, 2019. "Vertical Integration and Market Foreclosure: Empirical Evidence from the Korean Movie Industry," Korean Economic Review, Korean Economic Association, vol. 35, pages 417-438.
    10. Nathan H. Miller & Matthew Osborne, 2014. "Spatial differentiation and price discrimination in the cement industry: evidence from a structural model," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 45(2), pages 221-247, June.
    11. Jenny Schuetz & Jed Kolko & Rachel Meltzer, 2010. "Is the 'Shop Around the Corner' a Luxury or a Nuisance? The relationship between income and neighborhood retail patterns," Working Paper 8513, USC Lusk Center for Real Estate.
    12. Glenn Ellison & Sara Fisher Ellison, 2006. "Internet Retail Demand: Taxes, Geography, and Online-Offline Competition," NBER Working Papers 12242, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Allen Tran, 2014. "The Aggregate Impact Of Online Retail," Working Papers 14-23, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    14. Chen, Xi, 2018. "When does store consolidation lead to higher emissions?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 109-122.
    15. Martin Lábaj & Karol Morvay & Peter Silanič & Christoph Weiss & Biliana Yontcheva, 2018. "Market structure and competition in transition: results from a spatial analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(15), pages 1694-1715, March.
    16. Nicholas Economides & Przemyslaw Jeziorski, 2017. "Mobile Money in Tanzania," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 815-837, November.
    17. Victor Aguirregabiria & Margaret Slade, 2017. "Empirical models of firms and industries," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(5), pages 1445-1488, December.
    18. Darlene Chisholm & Margaret McMillan & George Norman, 2010. "Product differentiation and film-programming choice: do first-run movie theatres show the same films?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 34(2), pages 131-145, May.
    19. Jung, Jinho & Sesmero, Juan Pablo & Balagtas, Joseph V., 2017. "Market Power in Feedstock Procurement and Economic Effects of Corn Ethanol," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258544, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Dapeng Liu & Pascal Courty, 2022. "Some economics of movie exhibition: increasing returns and Imax revenue premium," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 46(4), pages 597-634, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:13/866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nathalie Verhaeghe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ferugbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.