IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v121y2009i2p533-549.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coordinating multi-business sales through management simulators

Author

Listed:
  • Miragliotta, Giovanni
  • Brun, Alessandro
  • Soydan, Ilker A.

Abstract

Multi-business corporations are used to face complex decision-making problems. Among these, one of the most complex one is that of managing their Sales Force so as to balance and exploit their multi-business portfolio. The case outlined in this paper explores the cross-selling approach to sales management; this approach aims at aligning, controlling and enhancing the sales performances of a multi-business company. Such a complex environment offered an interesting playground to see whether the system dynamics methodology could help the managerial decision-making process. The paper therefore pinpoints a simulation work carried out at Siemens Turkey, which includes the analysis and simulations of the current sales structure and the re-design of the sales management policy. The developed simulation model claims to be the most detailed market growth model in Siemens. In February 2005, the model was turned into a management game, which has been played by 22 managers to enhance organisational learning. Some months later, in October 2005, it has been presented as a benchmark application at the company headquarters (Germany), to show that the company was suffering from its own order processing mechanism, which was acting as an aging-chain, and that the cross-selling policy would outperform the current method in terms of larger sales figure and less severe oscillations. The paper presents both these research and learning experiences, and discusses executive business recommendations (to reduce the delays in the order structure, to modify the salesmen bonus schemes for cross-selling and the frequency of Siemens ONE Training programme) as well as it proposes further suggestions for model development and implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Miragliotta, Giovanni & Brun, Alessandro & Soydan, Ilker A., 2009. "Coordinating multi-business sales through management simulators," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 533-549, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:121:y:2009:i:2:p:533-549
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925-5273(06)00268-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evans, G. N. & Naim, M. M. & Towill, D. R., 1998. "Application of a simulation methodology to the redesign of a logistical control system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 157-168, September.
    2. Iassinovski, S. & Artiba, A. & Bachelet, V. & Riane, F., 2003. "Integration of simulation and optimization for solving complex decision making problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 3-10, July.
    3. Disney, S. M. & Towill, D. R., 2003. "The effect of vendor managed inventory (VMI) dynamics on the Bullwhip Effect in supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 199-215, August.
    4. Alstrom, Poul & Madsen, Per, 1996. "Tracking signals in inventory control systems A simulation study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1-3), pages 293-302, August.
    5. Sterman, John. & Kampmann, Christian Peter Erik., 1992. "Do markets mitigate misperceptions of feedback in dynamic tasks?," Working papers 3421-92., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    6. Agrell, Per J. & Wikner, Joakim, 1996. "An MCDM framework for dynamic systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1-3), pages 279-292, August.
    7. Holweg, Matthias & Bicheno, John, 2002. "Supply chain simulation - a tool for education, enhancement and endeavour," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 163-175, July.
    8. Potter, Andrew & Mason, Robert & Naim, Mohamed & Lalwani, Chandra, 2004. "The evolution towards an integrated steel supply chain: A case study from the UK," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 207-216, May.
    9. Thomas H. Naylor, 1977. "Why Corporate Planning Models?," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 8(1), pages 87-94, November.
    10. Simon, Herbert A, 1979. "Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(4), pages 493-513, September.
    11. Diehl, Ernst & Sterman, John D., 1995. "Effects of Feedback Complexity on Dynamic Decision Making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 198-215, May.
    12. Haapasalo, Harri & Hyvonen, Johanna, 2001. "Simulating business and operations management - a learning environment for the electronics industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(3), pages 261-272, October.
    13. Verhallen, T.M.M. & Greve, H.J.M. & Frambach, R.T., 1997. "Consultative selling in financial services : An observational study of the mortgage mediation process," Other publications TiSEM 79cd11b3-b568-45f6-a16a-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. Larsen, Erik R. & Morecroft, John D. W. & Thomsen, Jesper S., 1999. "Complex behaviour in a production-distribution model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(1), pages 61-74, November.
    15. Don N. Kleinmuntz, 1985. "Cognitive Heuristics and Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(6), pages 680-702, June.
    16. Zulch, Gert & Heitz, Max-Jurgen & Schindele, Hermann, 1995. "Use of simulation for planning of work organization in highly automated production systems -- Two case studies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1-3), pages 429-436, October.
    17. Sterman, John D., 1989. "Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 301-335, June.
    18. Laakso, Terho & Kleinhans, Stephane & Smeds, Riitta & Doumeingts, Guy, 1998. "Embedding the management of evolution into strategic learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 333-345, September.
    19. Sterman, John., 1994. "Learning in and about complex systems," Working papers 3660-94., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Strohhecker, Jürgen & Leyer, Michael, 2019. "How stock-flow failure and general cognitive ability impact performance in operational dynamic control tasks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 1044-1055.
    2. Gibson, Faison P., 2000. "Feedback Delays: How Can Decision Makers Learn Not to Buy a New Car Every Time the Garage Is Empty?," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 141-166, September.
    3. John Hey & Tibor Neugebauer & Abdolkarim Sadrieh, 2009. "An Experimental Analysis of Optimal Renewable Resource Management: The Fishery," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 44(2), pages 263-285, October.
    4. Yang, Y. & Lin, J. & Liu, G. & Zhou, L., 2021. "The behavioural causes of bullwhip effect in supply chains: A systematic literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    5. Cronin, Matthew A. & Gonzalez, Cleotilde & Sterman, John D., 2009. "Why don't well-educated adults understand accumulation? A challenge to researchers, educators, and citizens," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 116-130, January.
    6. Langley, Paul A. & Morecroft, John D. W., 2004. "Performance and learning in a simulation of oil industry dynamics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(3), pages 715-732, June.
    7. H. Norouzi Nav & M. R. Jahed Motlagh & A. Makui, 2017. "Robust controlling of chaotic behavior in supply chain networks," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(6), pages 711-724, June.
    8. Repenning, Nelson P. (Nelson Peter), 1998. "The transition problem in product development," Working papers WP 4036-98., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    9. Lurie, Nicholas H. & Swaminathan, Jayashankar M., 2009. "Is timely information always better? The effect of feedback frequency on decision making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 108(2), pages 315-329, March.
    10. Lin, J. & Naim, M.M. & Purvis, L. & Gosling, J., 2017. "The extension and exploitation of the inventory and order based production control system archetype from 1982 to 2015," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 135-152.
    11. Atkins, Paul W. B. & Wood, Robert E. & Rutgers, Philip J., 2002. "The effects of feedback format on dynamic decision making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 587-604, July.
    12. Lane, David C. & Rouwette, Etiënne A.J.A., 2023. "Towards a behavioural system dynamics: Exploring its scope and delineating its promise," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 777-794.
    13. Li, Gang & Yang, Hongjiao & Sun, Linyan & Ji, Ping & Feng, Lei, 2010. "The evolutionary complexity of complex adaptive supply networks: A simulation and case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 310-330, April.
    14. Howick, Susan, 2005. "Using system dynamics models with litigation audiences," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(1), pages 239-250, April.
    15. Enrique Holgado de Frutos & Juan R Trapero & Francisco Ramos, 2020. "A literature review on operational decisions applied to collaborative supply chains," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-28, March.
    16. Arango, Santiago & Castañeda, Jaime A. & Larsen, Erik R., 2013. "Mothballing in power markets: An experimental study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 125-134.
    17. Sterman, John & Booth Sweeney, Linda, 2003. "Cloudy Skies: Assessing Public Understanding of Global Warming," Working papers 4361-02, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    18. Ponte, Borja & Costas, José & Puche, Julio & Pino, Raúl & de la Fuente, David, 2018. "The value of lead time reduction and stabilization: A comparison between traditional and collaborative supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 165-185.
    19. Adenso-Díaz, Belarmino & Moreno, Plácido & Gutiérrez, Ester & Lozano, Sebastián, 2012. "An analysis of the main factors affecting bullwhip in reverse supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 917-928.
    20. Repenning, Nelson P. (Nelson Peter) & Sterman, John., 1997. "Getting quality the old-fashioned way : self confirming attributions in the dynamics of process improvement," Working papers WP 3952-97., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:121:y:2009:i:2:p:533-549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.