IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i22p9655-d447771.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Proposal for a Maturity Model in Sustainability in the Supply Chain

Author

Listed:
  • Davidson de Almeida Santos

    (Department of Production Engineering, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói 24210-240, Brazil)

  • Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas

    (Department of Production Engineering, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói 24210-240, Brazil)

  • Carlos Francisco Simões Gomes

    (Department of Production Engineering, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói 24210-240, Brazil)

  • Luis Perez Zotes

    (Department of Production Engineering, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói 24210-240, Brazil)

  • Sérgio Luiz Braga França

    (Department of Production Engineering, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói 24210-240, Brazil)

  • Guilherme Vinagre Pinto de Souza

    (Department of Production Engineering, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói 24210-240, Brazil)

  • Robson Amarante de Araújo

    (Department of Production Engineering, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói 24210-240, Brazil)

  • Sheila da Silva Carvalho Santos

    (Celso Suckow da Fonseca Federal Center for Technological Education, Rio de Janeiro 20271-204, Brazil)

Abstract

Sustainability has become a relevant element for organizations due to several motivators: companies adopt sustainability practices in need for regulatory compliance, anticipation of regulatory changes, understanding of limited natural resources, and a desire to limit expenditure associated with resource consumption and waste disposal. Thus, this article aims to identify the gaps present in maturity models, present an integrator theoretical model that considers the characteristic elements of the models present in the literature and affects the level of maturity in sustainability. The construction of the integrator theoretical model was based on the following stages: research questions; theoretical framework on Supply Chain Management; sustainability and concept of maturity model; maturity models and performance measurement systems; interpretation/analysis of research; and construction of the integrator theoretical model. The literature review was carried out in the Scopus and Web of Science databases. The main conclusions: maturity models focus on only one aspect or are excessively broad and do not include in detail the elements necessary to measure the level of maturity in sustainability. The proposed model aims to mitigate these gaps with the addition of the cross-sectional dimension, which offers an integrated and holistic view in relation to the other dimensions.

Suggested Citation

  • Davidson de Almeida Santos & Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas & Carlos Francisco Simões Gomes & Luis Perez Zotes & Sérgio Luiz Braga França & Guilherme Vinagre Pinto de Souza & Robson Amarante de Araújo, 2020. "Proposal for a Maturity Model in Sustainability in the Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-37, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9655-:d:447771
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9655/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9655/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harri Laihonen & Sanna Pekkola, 2016. "Impacts of using a performance measurement system in supply chain management: a case study," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(18), pages 5607-5617, September.
    2. Rick Edgeman & Jacob Eskildsen, 2014. "Modeling and Assessing Sustainable Enterprise Excellence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 173-187, March.
    3. André Tchokogué & Jean Nollet & Nathalie Merminod & Gilles Paché & Véronique Goupil, 2018. "Is Supply's Actual Contribution to Sustainable Development Strategic and Operational?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 336-358, March.
    4. Amanda Xavier & Tatiana Reyes & Améziane Aoussat & Leandro Luiz & Lucas M Souza, 2020. "Eco-Innovation Maturity Model: A Framework to Support the Evolution of Eco-Innovation Integration in Companies," Post-Print hal-02881890, HAL.
    5. Mike Bourne, Andy Neely, John Mills, Ken Platts, 2003. "Implementing performance measurement systems: a literature review," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(1), pages 1-24.
    6. Lineia Jollembeck Lopes & Silvio R. I. Pires, 2020. "Green supply chain management in the automotive industry: A study in Brazil," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2755-2769, September.
    7. Elisabete Correia & Helena Carvalho & Susana G. Azevedo & Kannan Govindan, 2017. "Maturity Models in Supply Chain Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-26, January.
    8. Estampe, Dominique & Lamouri, Samir & Paris, Jean-Luc & Brahim-Djelloul, Sakina, 2013. "A framework for analysing supply chain performance evaluation models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 247-258.
    9. Uche Okongwu & Risako Morimoto & Matthieu Lauras, 2013. "The maturity of supply chain sustainability disclosure from a continuous improvement perspective," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 62(8), pages 827-855, October.
    10. Simonov Kusi-Sarpong & Himanshu Gupta & Joseph Sarkis, 2019. "A supply chain sustainability innovation framework and evaluation methodology," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(7), pages 1990-2008, April.
    11. Ji Yeon Yang & Taewoo Roh, 2019. "Open for Green Innovation: From the Perspective of Green Process and Green Consumer Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    12. Ekaterina Yatskovskaya & Jagjit Singh Srai & Mukesh Kumar, 2018. "Integrated Supply Network Maturity Model: Water Scarcity Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-26, March.
    13. Machado, Carla Gonçalves & Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Gouvea da Costa, Sergio Eduardo & Angelis, Jannis Jan & Mattioda, Rosana Adami, 2017. "Framing maturity based on sustainable operations management principles," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 3-21.
    14. Jarle Aarstad & Stig-Erik Jakobsen, 2020. "Norwegian Firms’ Green and New Industry Strategies: A Dual Challenge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, January.
    15. Dominik Zimon & Jonah Tyan & Robert Sroufe, 2019. "Implementing Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Reactive, Cooperative, and Dynamic Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-22, December.
    16. Umit S. Bititci & Patrizia Garengo & Aylin Ates & Sai S. Nudurupati, 2015. "Value of maturity models in performance measurement," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(10), pages 3062-3085, May.
    17. Rupert J. Baumgartner & Daniela Ebner, 2010. "Corporate sustainability strategies: sustainability profiles and maturity levels," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(2), pages 76-89.
    18. Govindan, Kannan & Soleimani, Hamed & Kannan, Devika, 2015. "Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 603-626.
    19. Amanda Xavier & Tatiana Reyes & Améziane Aoussat & Leandro Luiz & Lucas Souza, 2020. "Eco-Innovation Maturity Model: A Framework to Support the Evolution of Eco-Innovation Integration in Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-35, May.
    20. Ruifeng Gong & Jian Xue & Laijun Zhao & Oleksandra Zolotova & Xiaoqing Ji & Yan Xu, 2019. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Green Supply Chain Management Based on the Web of Science (WOS) Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    21. Erwin Rauch & Marco Unterhofer & Rafael A. Rojas & Luca Gualtieri & Manuel Woschank & Dominik T. Matt, 2020. "A Maturity Level-Based Assessment Tool to Enhance the Implementation of Industry 4.0 in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, April.
    22. Hald, Kim Sundtoft & Mouritsen, Jan, 2018. "The evolution of performance measurement systems in a supply chain: A longitudinal case study on the role of interorganisational factors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 256-271.
    23. Andersson, Par & Aronsson, Hakan & Storhagen, Nils G., 1989. "Measuring logistics performance," Engineering Costs and Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1-4), pages 253-262, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kaidi Nõmmela & Kati Kõrbe Kaare, 2022. "Incorporated Maritime Policy Concept: Adopting ESRS Principles to Support Maritime Sector’s Sustainable Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Katarzyna Piwowar-Sulej & Magdalena Rojek-Nowosielska & Agnieszka Sokołowska-Durkalec & Urszula Markowska-Przybyła, 2022. "Maturity of CSR Implementation at the Organizational Level—From Literature Review to a Comprehensive Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Mariusz Kmiecik, 2022. "Logistics Coordination Based on Inventory Management and Transportation Planning by Third-Party Logistics (3PL)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Ana Carolina Salles & Guilherme Lerch Lunardi & Fabiano Thompson, 2022. "A Framework Proposal to Assess the Maturity of Green IT in Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Munyaradzi Bvuchete & Sara Saartjie Grobbelaar & Joubert van Eeden, 2021. "A Network Maturity Mapping Tool for Demand-Driven Supply Chain Management: A Case for the Public Healthcare Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-29, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ekaterina Yatskovskaya & Jagjit Singh Srai & Mukesh Kumar, 2018. "Integrated Supply Network Maturity Model: Water Scarcity Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Elisabete Correia & Helena Carvalho & Susana G. Azevedo & Kannan Govindan, 2017. "Maturity Models in Supply Chain Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-26, January.
    3. Jia-Liang Pan & Chui-Yu Chiu & Kun-Shan Wu & Chih-Te Yang & Yen-Wen Wang, 2021. "Optimal Pricing, Advertising, Production, Inventory and Investing Policies in a Multi-Stage Sustainable Supply Chain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Yugang He & Renhong Wu & Yong-Jae Choi, 2021. "International Logistics and Cross-Border E-Commerce Trade: Who Matters Whom?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Karolina Werner-Lewandowska & Paulina Golinska-Dawson, 2021. "Sustainable Logistics Management Maturity—The Theoretical Assessment Framework and Empirical Results from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, May.
    6. Paulina Golinska-Dawson & Karolina Werner-Lewandowska & Monika Kosacka-Olejnik, 2021. "Responsible Resource Management in Remanufacturing—Framework for Qualitative Assessment in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Wensi Zhang & Jing Xiao & Lingfei Cai, 2020. "Joint Emission Reduction Strategy in Green Supply Chain under Environmental Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-24, April.
    8. Liane Pinho Santos & João F. Proença, 2022. "Developing Return Supply Chain: A Research on the Automotive Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-24, May.
    9. Mathias Cöster & Gunnar Dahlin & Raine Isaksson, 2020. "Are They Reporting the Right Thing and Are They Doing It Right?—A Measurement Maturity Grid for Evaluation of Sustainability Reports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Pavan Manocha & Jagjit Singh Srai, 2020. "Exploring Environmental Supply Chain Innovation in M&A," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Cory Searcy, 2016. "Measuring Enterprise Sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 120-133, February.
    12. Jesús Morcillo-Bellido & Luis Isasi-Sanchez & Isabel Garcia-Gutierrez & Alfonso Duran-Heras, 2021. "Model Based Analysis of Innovation in Sustainable Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    13. Muwen Wang & Kecheng Zhang, 2022. "Improving Agricultural Green Supply Chain Management by a Novel Integrated Fuzzy-Delphi and Grey-WINGS Model," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, September.
    14. Amanda Xavier & Tatiana Reyes & Améziane Aoussat & Leandro Luiz & Lucas Souza, 2020. "Eco-Innovation Maturity Model: A Framework to Support the Evolution of Eco-Innovation Integration in Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-35, May.
    15. Seiler, A. & Papanagnou, C. & Scarf, P., 2020. "On the relationship between financial performance and position of businesses in supply chain networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    16. Jesko Schulte & Sophie Isaksson Hallstedt, 2018. "Self-Assessment Method for Sustainability Implementation in Product Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-24, November.
    17. Eleonora Bottani & Giorgia Casella & Majcol Nobili & Letizia Tebaldi, 2022. "An Analytic Model for Estimating the Economic and Environmental Impact of Food Cold Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    18. YoungSeok Hwang & Jung-Sup Um & JunHwa Hwang & Stephan Schlüter, 2020. "Evaluating the Causal Relations between the Kaya Identity Index and ODIAC-Based Fossil Fuel CO 2 Flux," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    19. Radosław Wolniak, 2019. "The Level of Maturity of Quality Management Systems in Poland—Results of Empirical Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-17, August.
    20. Hald, Kim Sundtoft & Mouritsen, Jan, 2018. "The evolution of performance measurement systems in a supply chain: A longitudinal case study on the role of interorganisational factors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 256-271.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9655-:d:447771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.