Which demand systems can be generated by discrete choice?
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Other versions of this item:
- Armstrong, Mark & Vickers, John, 2015. "Which demand systems can be generated by discrete choice?," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 158(PA), pages 293-307.
- Armstrong, Mark & Vickers, John, 2015. "Which demand systems can be generated by discrete choice?," MPRA Paper 63439, University Library of Munich, Germany.
References listed on IDEAS
- Hanemann, W Michael, 1984. "Discrete-Continuous Models of Consumer Demand," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 541-561, May.
- McFadden, Daniel, 1980. "Econometric Models for Probabilistic Choice among Products," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 53(3), pages 13-29, July.
- Matthew Gentzkow, 2007. "Valuing New Goods in a Model with Complementarity: Online Newspapers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(3), pages 713-744, June.
- Armstrong, Mark, 2013.
"A more general theory of commodity bundling,"
Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 148(2), pages 448-472.
- Armstrong, Mark, 2012. "A more general theory of commodity bundling," MPRA Paper 37375, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Mark Armstrong, 2012. "A More General Theory of Commodity Bundling," Economics Series Working Papers 624, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
- Jaffe Sonia & Weyl E. Glen, 2010. "Linear Demand Systems are Inconsistent with Discrete Choice," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8, December.
- Anderson, Simon P. & De Palma, Andre & Thisse, Jacques-Francois, 1987.
"The CES is a discrete choice model?,"
Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 139-140.
- ANDERSON, Simon P. & de PALMA, André & THISSE, Jacques-François, 1987. "The CES is a discrete choice model?," LIDAM Reprints CORE 764, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
- Jaffe, Sonia & Kominers, Scott Duke, 2012. "Discrete choice cannot generate demand that is additively separable in own price," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 129-132.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Mark Armstrong, 2017.
"Ordered Consumer Search,"
Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 15(5), pages 989-1024.
- Armstrong, Mark, 2016. "Ordered Consumer Search," MPRA Paper 72194, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Armstrong, Mark, 2016. "Ordered Consumer Search," CEPR Discussion Papers 11566, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Daniela Saban & Gabriel Y. Weintraub, 2021. "Procurement Mechanisms for Assortments of Differentiated Products," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 795-820, May.
- Bhattacharya, D., 2018. "Income Effects and Rationalizability in Multinomial Choice Models," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1884, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
- Jacques-Francois Thisse & Philip Ushchev, 2016. "When Can A Demand System Be Described By A Multinomial Logit With Income Effect?," HSE Working papers WP BRP 139/EC/2016, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
- Hedyeh Beyhaghi & Linda Cai, 2023. "Recent Developments in Pandora's Box Problem: Variants and Applications," Papers 2308.12242, arXiv.org.
- Amir, Rabah & Erickson, Philip & Jin, Jim, 2017. "On the microeconomic foundations of linear demand for differentiated products," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 641-665.
- Greminger, Rafael, 2019. "Optimal Search and Awareness Expansion," Other publications TiSEM ac47e6ff-42a4-4d70-addd-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
- John A List & Ian Muirex & Devin Pope & Gregory Sun, 2023.
"Left-Digit Bias at Lyft,"
The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 90(6), pages 3186-3237.
- John List & Ian Muir & Devin Pope & Gregory Sun, 2023. "Left-Digit Bias at Lyft," Natural Field Experiments 00771, The Field Experiments Website.
- Takanori Adachi & Takeshi Ebina, 2016. "Log-linear demand systems with differentiated products are inconsistent with the representative consumer approach," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(1), pages 260-267.
- Casaburi, Lorenzo & Reed, Tristan, 2017. "Competition in Agricultural Markets: An Experimental Approach," CEPR Discussion Papers 11985, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Rafael P. Greminger, 2019. "Optimal Search and Discovery," Papers 1911.07773, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
- Stephan Müller & Georg Wangenheim, 2017. "The impact of market innovations on the dissemination of social norms: the sustainability case," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 663-690, September.
- Volker Nocke & Nicolas Schutz, 2018.
"Multiproduct‐Firm Oligopoly: An Aggregative Games Approach,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 86(2), pages 523-557, March.
- Nocke, Volker & Schutz, Nicolas, 2016. "Multiproduct-Firm Oligopoly: An Aggregative Games Approach," CEPR Discussion Papers 11539, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Choné, Philippe & Linnemer, Laurent, 2020.
"Linear demand systems for differentiated goods: Overview and user’s guide,"
International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
- Philippe Choné & Laurent Linnemer, 2020. "Linear demand systems for differentiated goods: Overview and user's guide," Working Papers hal-02882403, HAL.
- Petrikaitė, Vaiva, 2018. "A search model of costly product returns," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 236-251.
- Debopam Bhattacharya, 2019. "Integrability and Identification in Multinomial Choice Models," Papers 1902.11017, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.
- Giovanni Compiani & Gregory Lewis & Sida Peng & Peichun Wang, 2024. "Online Search and Optimal Product Rankings: An Empirical Framework," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 615-636, May.
- Rafael P. Greminger, 2022. "Optimal Search and Discovery," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(5), pages 3904-3924, May.
- Pavan, Alessandro & Fershtman, Daniel, 2020. "Sequential Learning with Endogenous Consideration Sets," CEPR Discussion Papers 15018, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Greminger, Rafael, 2019. "Optimal Search and Awareness Expansion," Discussion Paper 2019-034, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Steve Berry & Ahmed Khwaja & Vineet Kumar & Andres Musalem & Kenneth Wilbur & Greg Allenby & Bharat Anand & Pradeep Chintagunta & W. Hanemann & Przemek Jeziorski & Angelo Mele, 2014. "Structural models of complementary choices," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 245-256, September.
- Zhou, Jidong, 2021.
"Mixed bundling in oligopoly markets,"
Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
- Zhou, Jidong, 2019. "Mixed Bundling in Oligopoly Markets," MPRA Paper 97432, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Jidong Zhou, 2021. "Mixed Bundling in Oligopoly Markets," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2270, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
- Takanori Adachi & Takeshi Ebina, 2016. "Log-linear demand systems with differentiated products are inconsistent with the representative consumer approach," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(1), pages 260-267.
- André de Palma & Julien Monardo, 2017. "The General Nesting Logit (GNL) Model using Aggregate Data," Working Papers hal-01552455, HAL.
- Kidokoro, Yukihiro, 2016. "A micro foundation for discrete choice models with multiple categories of goods," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 54-72.
- Joonhwi Joo & Ali Hortacsu, 2016. "Semiparametric estimation of CES demand system with observed and unobserved product characteristics," 2016 Meeting Papers 36, Society for Economic Dynamics.
- Steven Berry & Amit Gandhi & Philip Haile, 2013.
"Connected Substitutes and Invertibility of Demand,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 81(5), pages 2087-2111, September.
- Steven T. Berry & Amit Gandhi & Philip Haile, 2011. "Connected Substitutes and Invertibility of Demand," NBER Working Papers 17193, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Steven Berry & Amit Gandhi & Philip A. Haile, 2012. "Connected Substitutes and Invertibility of Demand," Levine's Working Paper Archive 786969000000000545, David K. Levine.
- Steven Berry & Amit Gandhi & Philip Haile, 2011. "Connected Substitutes and Invertibility of Demand," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1806R, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised Jul 2012.
- Steven Berry & Amit Gandhi & Philip Haile, 2011. "Connected Substitutes and Invertibility of Demand," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1806, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
- Alessandro Iaria, & Wang, Ao, 2021. "An Empirical Model of Quantity Discounts with Large Choice Sets," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1378, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
- Volker Nocke & Nicolas Schutz, 2018.
"Multiproduct‐Firm Oligopoly: An Aggregative Games Approach,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 86(2), pages 523-557, March.
- Nocke, Volker & Schutz, Nicolas, 2016. "Multiproduct-Firm Oligopoly: An Aggregative Games Approach," CEPR Discussion Papers 11539, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Bokhari, Farasat A.S. & Mariuzzo, Franco, 2018.
"Demand estimation and merger simulations for drugs: Logits v. AIDS,"
International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 653-685.
- Farasat A.S. Bokhari & Franco Mariuzzo, 2018. "Demand estimation and merger simulations for drugs: Logits v. AIDS," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Competition Policy (CCP) 2016-06v3, Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
- Iaria, Alessandro & ,, 2020. "Identification and Estimation of Demand for Bundles," CEPR Discussion Papers 14363, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Bruneel-Zupanc, Christophe Alain, 2021. "Discrete-Continuous Dynamic Choice Models: Identification and Conditional Choice Probability Estimation," TSE Working Papers 21-1185, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
- Brian Goff & Michelle W. Trawick, 2008. "The Importance of Brand and Competition in Defining U.S. Religious Markets," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 74(4), pages 1035-1048, April.
- Holger Sieg & Jipeng Zhang, 2012. "The Effectiveness Of Private Benefits In Fundraising Of Local Charities," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 53(2), pages 349-374, May.
- Scott K. Shriver & Bryan Bollinger, 2022. "Demand Expansion and Cannibalization Effects from Retail Store Entry: A Structural Analysis of Multichannel Demand," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(12), pages 8829-8856, December.
- Jean-Pierre H. Dubé, 2018. "Microeconometric Models of Consumer Demand," NBER Working Papers 25215, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Yukihiro Kidokoro, 2015. "Discrete choice models for multicategory goods," GRIPS Discussion Papers 15-08, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
- Abdul Pinjari & Chandra Bhat & David S. Bunch, 2013. "Workshop report: recent advances on modeling multiple discrete-continuous choices," Chapters, in: Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly (ed.), Choice Modelling, chapter 3, pages 73-90, Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Richard Carson & Theodore Groves, 2007.
"Incentive and informational properties of preference questions,"
Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 37(1), pages 181-210, May.
- Carson, Richard T & Groves, Theodore, 2010. "Incentive and Information Properties of Preference Questions," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt88d8644g, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
- Pradeep K. Chintagunta & Harikesh S. Nair, 2011. "Structural Workshop Paper --Discrete-Choice Models of Consumer Demand in Marketing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(6), pages 977-996, November.
More about this item
Keywords
Discrete choice; unit demand; multiproduct demand functions;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- D01 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles
- D11 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Theory
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-DCM-2014-12-13 (Discrete Choice Models)
- NEP-MIC-2014-12-13 (Microeconomics)
- NEP-TRE-2014-12-13 (Transport Economics)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oxf:wpaper:729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anne Pouliquen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfeixuk.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.