IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/3j4sh.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Late to the Party? Agile Methods in British and German Government Institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Kupi, Maximilian

Abstract

This thesis project developed an online data collection and analysis system to trace the evolution and spread of agile methods in British and German government institutions. Agile methods are rooted in the software development departments of the private sector and are characterised by an iterative development process that focuses on the user. As the digital transformation gains ground in the public sector, these methods are also becoming more relevant to government institutions. Yet, public management literature still lacks an understanding of the temporal and spatial evolution of this development. To fill this research gap, this study analysed the occurrence of agile methods related keywords on British and German government websites over time. A total of 49 government domains were crawled and 171,569 potentially agile related pages downloaded. After preprocessing (e.g. extracting the publishing organisation’s name and the publishing date) and cleaning the data, 451 relevant sites were left. The analysis showed that the number of agile related sites published by government institutions as well as the number of government domains publishing agile sites increased over time and particularly in recent years (289% increase in number of published sites from 2017 to 2019). Furthermore, it revealed that 84% of agile sites also mention digital transformation related keywords. German federal and state level institutions published a total of 74 agile related pages, the first one in 2015, and the most active bodies turned out to be the Federal Ministry of Labour & Social Aairs and the state of Baden-Württemberg. The Federal Government Office and the Bavarian government lead in terms of most detailed methods description. On the other hand, Britons have been discussing agile methods on their government web presences since 2011 (380 pages in total), while the lead institutions in terms of number of sites published are the Government Digital Service and the Cabinet Office. With regard to the depth of agile methods descriptions the leaders are the Home Office and the Education & Skills Funding Agency. When comparing British and German central government ministerial departments, the wide lead – in terms of all three, quantity, timing, and depth – of the British institutions becomes apparent. To catch up, Germans should more strongly acknowledge the strategic relevance of agile methods for government’s digital transformation, and consider establishing distinct lighthouse institutions that internally push the application of agile methods and openly talk about it so that other institutions can follow. Future work could include further relevant actors such as NGOs, consultancies or media outlets in the analysis to possibly reveal who ”drives” the adoption of agile methods in government institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Kupi, Maximilian, 2020. "Late to the Party? Agile Methods in British and German Government Institutions," SocArXiv 3j4sh, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:3j4sh
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/3j4sh
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/604f8b58b57c9c02908076c2/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/3j4sh?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emily Henriette & Mondher Feki & Imed Boughzala, 2015. "The shape of digital transformation : a systematic literature review," Post-Print hal-02387019, HAL.
    2. Tilottama Ghosh & Sharolyn J. Anderson & Christopher D. Elvidge & Paul C. Sutton, 2013. "Using Nighttime Satellite Imagery as a Proxy Measure of Human Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(12), pages 1-32, November.
    3. Ursula Kusay-Merkle, 2018. "Agiles Projektmanagement im Berufsalltag," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-662-56800-2, July.
    4. Atanu Sengupta & Sanjoy De, 2020. "Review of Literature," India Studies in Business and Economics, in: Assessing Performance of Banks in India Fifty Years After Nationalization, chapter 0, pages 15-30, Springer.
    5. Nicky J. Welton & Howard H. Z. Thom, 2015. "Value of Information," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 35(5), pages 564-566, July.
    6. Christoph Schmidt, 2016. "Agile Software Development," Progress in IS, in: Agile Software Development Teams, chapter 0, pages 7-35, Springer.
    7. Emily Henriette & Mondher Feki & Imed Boughzala, 2015. "The shape of digital transformation : a systematic literature review," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-02387019, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Imed Boughzala & Nesrine Ben Yahia & Narjès Bellamine Ben Saoud & Wissem Eljaoued, 2022. "Shape it better than skip it: mapping the territory of quantum computing and its transformative potential," Post-Print hal-03825319, HAL.
    2. Marija Jović & Edvard Tijan & Doroteja Vidmar & Andreja Pucihar, 2022. "Factors of Digital Transformation in the Maritime Transport Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Ludvík Eger, 2022. "The demands on competencies for digital transformation and the perception of business students," International Journal of Teaching and Education, European Research Center, vol. 10(1), pages 10-26, April.
    4. César Torres Martín & Christian Acal & Mohammed El Homrani & Ángel Custodio Mingorance Estrada, 2021. "Impact on the Virtual Learning Environment Due to COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Amin, Adnan & Shah, Babar & Khattak, Asad Masood & Lopes Moreira, Fernando Joaquim & Ali, Gohar & Rocha, Alvaro & Anwar, Sajid, 2019. "Cross-company customer churn prediction in telecommunication: A comparison of data transformation methods," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 304-319.
    6. Francisco Javier Forcadell & Elisa Aracil & Fernando Ubeda, 2020. "Using reputation for corporate sustainability to tackle banks digitalization challenges," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2181-2193, September.
    7. John Levesque & Cédric Dalmasso & Sophie Hooge, 2022. "Understanding the Impacts of Digital Transformation in the Service Industry: the Mutation of the Back-Office Function in the Insurance Sector," Post-Print hal-04068150, HAL.
    8. Krishna Kumar Dadsena & Pushpesh Pant & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Saurabh Pratap, 2024. "Overcoming strategies for supply chain digitization barriers: Implications for sustainable development goals," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 3887-3910, July.
    9. Gong, Cheng & Ribiere, Vincent, 2021. "Developing a unified definition of digital transformation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    10. Prakriti Ghimire, 2021. "Digitalization Of Indigenous Knowledge In Nepal – Review Article," Acta Informatica Malaysia (AIM), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 5(2), pages 42-47, August.
    11. Somayeh Kariman, 2021. "Usage and Knowledge of Technological Advances in a Multi-Cultural Country: The Level of Digitalisation in the UAE, Dubai," Theory Methodology Practice (TMP), Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 17(01), pages 43-51.
    12. Tijan, Edvard & Jović, Marija & Aksentijević, Saša & Pucihar, Andreja, 2021. "Digital transformation in the maritime transport sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    13. Tommaso Agasisti & Federico Frattini & Mara Soncin, 2020. "Digital Innovation in Times of Emergency: Reactions from a School of Management in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Scuotto, V & Nicotra, M. & Del Giudice, M. & Krueger, N. & Gregori, G.L., 2021. "A microfoundational perspective on SMEs’ growth in the digital transformation era," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 382-392.
    15. Zarqa Shaheen Ali & Jiachen Song, 2022. "Digital Platforms and Real Estate Industry during COVID-19," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 25(4), pages 499-523.
    16. Kateryna Andriushchenko & Andrii Buriachenko & Olexandr Rozhko & Oksana Lavruk & Pavel Skok & Yaroslava Hlushchenko & Yelyzaveta Muzychka & Nataliia Slavina & Olena Buchynska & Viktoriia Kondarevych, 2020. "Peculiarities of sustainable development of enterprises in the context of digital transformation," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(3), pages 2255-2270, March.
    17. Vincenzo Varriale & Antonello Cammarano & Francesca Michelino & Mauro Caputo, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Chains with Blockchain, IoT and RFID: A Simulation on Order Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, June.
    18. Valeria Costantini & Francesco Crespi & Giovanni Marin & Elena Paglialunga, 2016. "Eco-innovation, sustainable supply chains and environmental performance in European industries," LEM Papers Series 2016/19, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    19. Eric Gaisie, 2017. "Living standards in pre-independent Ghana: evidence from household budgets," HHB Working Papers Series 7, The Historical Household Budgets Project.
    20. Lee, Alice J. & Ames, Daniel R., 2017. "“I can’t pay more” versus “It’s not worth more”: Divergent effects of constraint and disparagement rationales in negotiations," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 16-28.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:3j4sh. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.