IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/kfg6m_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

UGII – University Gender Inequality Index. A proposal from the University of Bologna

Author

Listed:
  • Mignoli, Gian Piero
  • Siboni, Benedetta Prof.

    (University of Bologna)

  • Rignanese, Pasqua
  • Valentini, Camilla
  • Toschi, Tullia Gallina

Abstract

While universities have been considered gender neutral, being organisations in which merit should prevail, several reports denounce the under-representation of women worldwide. According to the European Union this current under-representation results in a waste of female talent and, thus, prevents the achievement of the European Research Area’s objective of Excellence in Research. Several gender indexes have been proposed to measure “gender equality” in countries, while only one addresses university. However, it primarily focuses on academics, thus neglecting non-academic staff and students. This paper aims to propose a new index formulated to measure and rank “gender inequality” at universities: the University Gender Inequality Index (UGII). This index results from the determination of 9 domains and 25 aspects measured by 25 indicators, considering academic staff, technical-administrative staff and students. Domains include both endogenous and exogenous aspects, but UGII builds on endogenous ones that universities can directly influence. All indicators come from existing databases, thus assuring its replicability over different universities as well as its sustainability. Using index numbers, UGII measures the distance between the situation of gender inequality performed by the university and the maximum level of inequality that can be recorded with regard to each domain. This gives the “real” situation of domains with male or female advantage, thus indicating directions in which to intervene to university governing bodies. Finally, synthesising index numbers calculated with reference to each domains, UGII gives a final score of the overall situation of gender inequality at the university, allowing comparisons among different time horizons and with other universities. This paper illustrates the methodology to calculate the UGII and its application with regards to the University of Bologna, and tests it for significance and completeness.

Suggested Citation

  • Mignoli, Gian Piero & Siboni, Benedetta Prof. & Rignanese, Pasqua & Valentini, Camilla & Toschi, Tullia Gallina, 2018. "UGII – University Gender Inequality Index. A proposal from the University of Bologna," OSF Preprints kfg6m_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:kfg6m_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/kfg6m_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5b6db6b590a7e0001a85d3f4/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/kfg6m_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giovanna Galizzi & Benedetta Siboni, 2016. "Positive action plans in Italian universities: does gender really matter?," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(2), pages 246-268, June.
    2. Matthew RE Symonds & Neil J Gemmell & Tamsin L Braisher & Kylie L Gorringe & Mark A Elgar, 2006. "Gender Differences in Publication Output: Towards an Unbiased Metric of Research Performance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(1), pages 1-5, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feichtinger, G. & Grass, D. & Kort, P.M., 2019. "Optimal scientific production over the life cycle," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    2. Peter van den Besselaar & Ulf Sandström, 2016. "Gender differences in research performance and its impact on careers: a longitudinal case study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(1), pages 143-162, January.
    3. Gustav Feichtinger & Dieter Grass & Maria Winkler-Dworak, 2020. "The mathematics of ageing:," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(2), pages 371-399, June.
    4. Michał Krawczyk & Magdalena Smyk, 2015. "Gender, beauty and support networks in academia: evidence from a field experiment," Working Papers 2015-43, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    5. Tahmooresnejad, Leila & Turkina, Ekaterina, 2022. "Female inventors over time: Factors affecting female Inventors’ innovation performance," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).
    6. K. C. Garg & S. Kumar, 2014. "Scientometric profile of Indian scientific output in life sciences with a focus on the contributions of women scientists," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(3), pages 1771-1783, March.
    7. Lisa Geraci & Steve Balsis & Alexander J. Busch Busch, 2015. "Gender and the h index in psychology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 2023-2034, December.
    8. Pleun Arensbergen & Inge van der Weijden & Peter Besselaar, 2012. "Gender differences in scientific productivity: a persisting phenomenon?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 93(3), pages 857-868, December.
    9. Nurith Epstein & Martin R Fischer, 2017. "Academic career intentions in the life sciences: Can research self-efficacy beliefs explain low numbers of aspiring physician and female scientists?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, September.
    10. Jordi Duch & Xiao Han T Zeng & Marta Sales-Pardo & Filippo Radicchi & Shayna Otis & Teresa K Woodruff & Luís A Nunes Amaral, 2012. "The Possible Role of Resource Requirements and Academic Career-Choice Risk on Gender Differences in Publication Rate and Impact," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-11, December.
    11. Andersen, Jens Peter & Nielsen, Mathias Wullum, 2018. "Google Scholar and Web of Science: Examining gender differences in citation coverage across five scientific disciplines," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 950-959.
    12. Bührer, Susanne & Frietsch, Rainer, 2020. "How do public investments in gender equality initiatives and publication patterns interrelate? The case of Germany," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    13. Maite Barrios & Anna Villarroya & Ángel Borrego, 2013. "Scientific production in psychology: a gender analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(1), pages 15-23, April.
    14. Pritchard, Annette & Morgan, Nigel, 2017. "Tourism’s lost leaders: Analysing gender and performance," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 34-47.
    15. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo & Leonardo Grilli, 2024. "The role of non-scientific factors vis-à-vis the quality of publications in determining their scholarly impact," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(8), pages 5003-5019, August.
    16. Elsa Addessi & Marta Borgi & Elisabetta Palagi, 2012. "Is Primatology an Equal-Opportunity Discipline?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-6, January.
    17. Tahereh Dehdarirad & Anna Villarroya & Maite Barrios, 2015. "Research on women in science and higher education: a bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(3), pages 795-812, June.
    18. Nurith Epstein & Daniel Lachmann, 2018. "Gender Inequity during the Ph.D.: Females in the Life Sciences Benefit Less from Their Integration into the Scientific Community," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-15, August.
    19. Matthias Kuppler, 2022. "Predicting the future impact of Computer Science researchers: Is there a gender bias?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(11), pages 6695-6732, November.
    20. John Panaretos & Chrisovaladis Malesios, 2009. "Assessing scientific research performance and impact with single indices," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 81(3), pages 635-670, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:kfg6m_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.