IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/am92y_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A data-driven approach to spatial interaction models of migration: Integrating and refining the theories of Competing Destinations and Intervening Opportunities

Author

Listed:
  • Liao, Mengyu
  • Oshan, Taylor M.

Abstract

Traditional spatial interaction (SI) models of migration are susceptible to misspecification when the spatial structure of locations is not properly incorporated. To address this, a novel SI model for migration is introduced that integrates the theories of Competing Destinations (CD) and Intervening Opportunities (IO) to capture multiscale spatial structure using the recent generalized additive spatial smoothing (GASS) framework. This GASS CDIO model can identify the appropriate spatial scales to represent the spatial structure of origins and destinations in a data-driven manner. Validation of the model was conducted through two simulation experiments. The first demonstrates that employing the incorrect scale to capture spatial structure in SI models biases the parameter estimates and increases uncertainty. The second demonstrates that the GASS approach reliably recovers accurate parameters by identifying optimal hyperparameters associated with multiple spatial scales. The GASS CDIO model was then applied to U.S. inter-county migration data and compared to several other model specifications. The results reveal the unique spatial structure from the perspective of origins and destinations and illustrate the improved recoverability of anticipated migration relationships. This work suggests that the GASS CDIO model better integrates spatial theories of migration and accounts for the multiscale nature of SI processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Liao, Mengyu & Oshan, Taylor M., 2025. "A data-driven approach to spatial interaction models of migration: Integrating and refining the theories of Competing Destinations and Intervening Opportunities," OSF Preprints am92y_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:am92y_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/am92y_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/67882472bef8a6888c3417ce/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/am92y_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martijn Burger & Frank van Oort & Gert-Jan Linders, 2009. "On the Specification of the Gravity Model of Trade: Zeros, Excess Zeros and Zero-inflated Estimation," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 167-190.
    2. Oshan, Taylor M., 2020. "Potential and pitfalls of big transport data for spatial interaction models of urban mobility," OSF Preprints gwumt, Center for Open Science.
    3. Hanchen Yu, 2024. "Exploring Multiscale Spatial Interactions: Multiscale Geographically Weighted Negative Binomial Regression," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(3), pages 574-590, March.
    4. Morton Schneider, 1959. "Gravity Models And Trip Distribution Theory," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(1), pages 51-56, January.
    5. Chaogui Kang & Yu Liu & Diansheng Guo & Kun Qin, 2015. "A Generalized Radiation Model for Human Mobility: Spatial Scale, Searching Direction and Trip Constraint," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-11, November.
    6. Maryam Kordi & A. Stewart Fotheringham, 2016. "Spatially Weighted Interaction Models (SWIM)," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 106(5), pages 990-1012, September.
    7. H. Makower & J. Marschak & H. W. Robinson, 1939. "Studies In Mobility Of Labour: Analysis For Great Britain, Part I," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 0(1), pages 70-97.
    8. repec:rre:publsh:v:37:y:2007:i:1:p:28-38 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Oshan, Taylor M. & Liao, Mengyu, 2024. "Generalized additive spatial smoothing (GASS): A multiscale regression framework for modeling neighborhood effects across spatial supports," OSF Preprints 9ekwy_v1, Center for Open Science.
    10. Taylor M Oshan, 2016. "A primer for working with the Spatial Interaction modeling (SpInt) module in the python spatial analysis library (PySAL)," REGION, European Regional Science Association, vol. 3, pages 11-23.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oshan, Taylor M., 2020. "The spatial structure debate in spatial interaction modeling: 50 years on," OSF Preprints 42vxn_v1, Center for Open Science.
    2. Oshan, Taylor M., 2020. "The spatial structure debate in spatial interaction modeling: 50 years on," OSF Preprints 42vxn, Center for Open Science.
    3. Oshan, Taylor M., 2022. "Spatial Interaction Modeling," OSF Preprints m3ah8, Center for Open Science.
    4. Oshan, Taylor M., 2022. "Spatial Interaction Modeling," OSF Preprints m3ah8_v1, Center for Open Science.
    5. Park, Souneil & Oshan, Taylor M. & Finamore, Alessandro & El Ali, Abdallah, 2020. "Are we breaking bubbles as we move? Exploring the relationship between urban mobility and segregation," OSF Preprints 2ubzn_v1, Center for Open Science.
    6. Vanni, Fabio, 2024. "A visit generation process for human mobility random graphs with location-specific latent-variables: From land use to travel demand," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    7. Rabah Arezki & Klaus Deininger & Harris Selod, 2015. "What Drives the Global "Land Rush"?," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 29(2), pages 207-233.
    8. Bo Xiong & John Beghin, 2017. "Disentangling Demand-Enhancing And Trade-Cost Effects Of Maximum Residue Regulations," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: John Christopher Beghin (ed.), Nontariff Measures and International Trade, chapter 6, pages 105-108, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    9. Schaak, Henning, 2015. "The Impact of Free Trade Agreements on International Agricultural Trade: A Gravity Application on the Dairy Product Trade and the ASEAN-China-FTA," 55th Annual Conference, Giessen, Germany, September 23-25, 2015 211619, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    10. Marco Dueñas & Giorgio Fagiolo, 2013. "Modeling the International-Trade Network: a gravity approach," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 8(1), pages 155-178, April.
    11. Ernest Miguélez & Rosina Moreno, 2013. "Do Labour Mobility and Technological Collaborations Foster Geographical Knowledge Diffusion? The Case of European Regions," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 321-354, June.
    12. Ron Boschma & Simona Iammarino & Raffaele Paci & Jordy Suriñach & Raul Ramos & Jordi Suriñach, 2017. "A Gravity Model of Migration Between the ENC and the EU," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 108(1), pages 21-35, February.
    13. Hans R.A. Koster & Jan Rouwendal, 2012. "The Impact Of Mixed Land Use On Residential Property Values," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(5), pages 733-761, December.
    14. Ines Buono & Guy Lalanne, 2010. "La réaction des entreprises françaises à la baisse des tarifs douaniers étrangers," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 435(1), pages 13-29.
    15. Tranos, Emmanouil & Incera, Andre Carrascal & Willis, George, 2022. "Using the web to predict regional trade flows: data extraction, modelling, and validation," OSF Preprints 9bu5z, Center for Open Science.
    16. Jagdambe, Subhash & Kannan, Elumalai, 2020. "Effects of ASEAN-India Free Trade Agreement on agricultural trade: The gravity model approach," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    17. Rabah Arezki & Klaus Deininger & Harris Selod, 2015. "What Drives the Global "Land Rush"?," World Bank Economic Review, World Bank Group, vol. 29(2), pages 207-233.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:am92y_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.