IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/agraaa/79-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Regional trade agreements and agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • OECD

Abstract

Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs) are key instruments to governing international trade, and reflect a balance between political and economic objectives. The level of liberalisation in the agriculture sector can differ substantially across negotiated agreements, and even across products within the same agreement. This paper synthesises the results of the analyses found in previous OECD studies on the agricultural component of some 53 RTAs. It identifies those components that can be trade constraining and explores ways in which future RTAs can facilitate trade. It finds that market access could be improved under an RTA by removing limitations on tariff concessions, harmonising rules of origin, limiting the use of special safeguards to those allowed by the WTO-AoA, prohibiting export subsidies and other export restrictions except as permitted by Article XI of WTO_GATT, and implementing core SPS principles.

Suggested Citation

  • Oecd, 2015. "Regional trade agreements and agriculture," OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers 79, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:agraaa:79-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5js4kg5xjvvf-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5js4kg5xjvvf-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5js4kg5xjvvf-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fabio Gaetano Santeramo & Emilia Lamonaca, 2022. "Standards and regulatory cooperation in regional trade agreements: What the effects on trade?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 1682-1701, December.
    2. Arita, Shawn & Mitchell, Lorraine & Beckman, Jayson, 2015. "Estimating the Effects of Selected Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures and Technical Barriers to Trade on U.S.-EU Agricultural Trade," Economic Research Report 212887, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Santeramo, Fabio G., 2017. "On Non-Tariff Measures and Changes in Trade Routes: From North-North to South-South Trade?," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 263493, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Jiehui Yuan & Xunmin Ou & Gehua Wang, 2017. "Establishing a Framework to Evaluate the Effect of Energy Countermeasures Tackling Climate Change and Air Pollution: The Example of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Santeramo, Fabio, 2019. "Trade Effects of SPS Measures in Regional Trade Agreements," 2019: Recent Advances in Applied General Equilibrium Modeling: Relevance and Application to Agricultural Trade Analysis, December 8-10, 2019, Washington, DC 339342, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    6. Lilibeth A. Acosta & Damasa B. Magcale-Macandog & K. S. Kavi Kumar & Xuefeng Cui & Elena A. Eugenio & Paula Beatrice M. Macandog & Arnold R. Salvacion & Jemimah Mae A. Eugenio, 2016. "The Role of Bioenergy in Enhancing Energy, Food and Ecosystem Sustainability Based on Societal Perceptions and Preferences in Asia," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-26, April.
    7. Fabio Gaetano Santeramo & Valentina Guerrieri & Emilia Lamonaca, 2018. "On the Evolution of Trade and Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standards: The Role of Trade Agreements," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. De Schutter, Olivier & Jacobs, Nick & Clément, Chantal, 2020. "A ‘Common Food Policy’ for Europe: How governance reforms can spark a shift to healthy diets and sustainable food systems," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    9. Louis J. Irving, 2015. "Carbon Assimilation, Biomass Partitioning and Productivity in Grasses," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Yazdani, Mehdi & Pirpour, Hamed, 2020. "Evaluating the effect of intra-industry trade on the bilateral trade productivity for petroleum products of Iran," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    11. Midamba Dick Chune & Mustaf Mohamed Takoy & Odongkara Peter, 2022. "Analysis of technical efficiency and its determinants among tobacco producers in Uganda: An application of data envelopment analysis," International Journal of Agricultural Research, Innovation and Technology (IJARIT), IJARIT Research Foundation, vol. 12(1), June.
    12. Işıl Fulya ORKUNOĞLU ŞAHİN & Ahmet Burçin YERELİ, 2016. "Seçilmiş AB Ülkelerinde ve Türkiye’de Patent Gelirlerine İlişkin Vergileme “Patent Box” Rejimi," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 24(29).
    13. Thomas F. Ducey & Jeffrey M. Novak & Mark G. Johnson, 2015. "Effects of Biochar Blends on Microbial Community Composition in Two Coastal Plain Soils," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-16, November.
    14. Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano & Lamonaca, Emilia, 2019. "The role of non-tariff measures in the agri-food sector: positive or negative instruments for trade?," MPRA Paper 96763, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Malancha Roy & Rimi Das & Amit Kundu & Sanmoy Karmakar & Satadal Das & Pradip Kumar Sen & Anupam Debsarcar & Joydeep Mukherjee, 2015. "Organic Cultivation of Tomato in India with Recycled Slaughterhouse Wastes: Evaluation of Fertilizer and Fruit Safety," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-31, September.
    16. Xiaojin Li & Ibrahim M. Abu-Reesh & Zhen He, 2015. "Development of Bioelectrochemical Systems to Promote Sustainable Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-22, June.
    17. Susan G. Low, 2015. "Signal Grass ( Brachiaria decumbens ) Toxicity in Grazing Ruminants," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-20, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    agriculture; regional trade agreements; safeguards; SPS measures; tariff elimination;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F1 - International Economics - - Trade
    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • Q10 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - General
    • Q23 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Forestry

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:agraaa:79-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tdoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.