IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/kei/dpaper/2012-013.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Impacts of Efforts and Outcomes on Self-gifting Behavior in Goal-achievement Contexts

Author

Listed:
  • Akinori Ono

    (Faculty of Business and Commerce, Keio University)

  • Ryohei Maeda

    (Keio University)

  • Bokyoung Park

    (Keio University)

  • Yuya Saruwatari

    (Keio University)

  • Kento Yamaguchi

    (Keio University)

  • Rin Shimizu

    (Keio University)

Abstract

This study developed a self-gifting intention model which describes that consumer intention to purchase self-gift in an achievement context is influenced by four factors, i.e., the amount of effort, happiness of success/sadness of failure, the necessary of recovery, and reward/therapeutic mood. The results of the structural equation modeling showed that, first, individuals purchase self-gifts in recovery for personal efforts in case of success, whereas they do not in case of failure. Second, the necessary of recovery is reduced by happiness of success, whereas it is reinforced by sadness of failure. Third, the amount of effort positively affects happiness of success as well as sadness of failure. Fourth, happiness of success/sadness of failure positively affects reward/therapeutic moods, which in turn positively affects self-gifting intention.

Suggested Citation

  • Akinori Ono & Ryohei Maeda & Bokyoung Park & Yuya Saruwatari & Kento Yamaguchi & Rin Shimizu, 2012. "Impacts of Efforts and Outcomes on Self-gifting Behavior in Goal-achievement Contexts," Keio/Kyoto Joint Global COE Discussion Paper Series 2012-013, Keio/Kyoto Joint Global COE Program.
    • Handle: RePEc:kei:dpaper:2012-013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ies.keio.ac.jp/old_project/old/gcoe-econbus/pdf/dp/DP2012-013.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luomala, Harri T. & Laaksonen, Martti, 1997. "Mood-regulatory self-gifts: Development of a conceptual framework," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 407-434, June.
    2. Sherry, John F, Jr, 1983. "Gift Giving in Anthropological Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 10(2), pages 157-168, September.
    3. Reilly, Michael D, 1982. "Working Wives and Convenience Consumption," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 8(4), pages 407-418, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gupta, Aditya & Eilert, Meike & Gentry, James W., 2020. "Can I surprise myself? A conceptual framework of surprise self-gifting among consumers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    2. repec:oup:jecgeo:v:50:y:2023:i:2:p:282-302. is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Russell Belk, 2007. "Why Not Share Rather Than Own?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 611(1), pages 126-140, May.
    4. Paraskevaidis, Pavlos & Andriotis, Konstantinos, 2015. "Values of souvenirs as commodities," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 1-10.
    5. Joy, Annamma & Wang, Jeff Jianfeng & Chan, Tsang-Sing & Sherry, John F. & Cui, Geng, 2014. "M(Art)Worlds: Consumer Perceptions of How Luxury Brand Stores Become Art Institutions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(3), pages 347-364.
    6. Ariane Berthoin Antal & Gervaise Debucquet & Sandrine Frémeaux, 2018. "Meaningful work and artistic interventions in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical exploration," Post-Print hal-03232781, HAL.
    7. Hutter, Michael, 2021. "Three Modes of Valuation Practices in Art Games," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 85-119.
    8. Jeanette A.M.J. Deetlefs & Mathew Chylinski & Andreas Ortmann, 2015. "MTurk ‘Unscrubbed’: Exploring the good, the ‘Super’, and the unreliable on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk," Discussion Papers 2015-20, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    9. Aurélie Kessous & Pierre Valette-Florence & Virginie de Barnier, 2016. "Luxury watch possession and dispossession from father to son: A poisoned gift? Pierre Valette-Florence, Professor, IAE de Grenoble," Post-Print hal-01472038, HAL.
    10. Krush, Michael T. & Pennington, Julia R. & Fowler, Aubrey R. & Mittelstaedt, John D., 2015. "Positive marketing: A new theoretical prototype of sharing in an online community," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2503-2512.
    11. Mehmet Bac, 2019. "Gift policy, bribes and corruption," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 255-275, April.
    12. Edirisingha, Prabash & Aitken, Robert & Ferguson, Shelagh, 2022. "Setting up home: The role of domestic materiality in extended family identity formation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1-15.
    13. Aliakbar Jafari & Mona Moufahim & Diego Rinallo & Samuelson Appau, 2023. "Theorizing consumption and markets in the context of religion," Post-Print hal-04325662, HAL.
    14. Jung-Yu Lai & Juite Wang, 2018. "Exploring the impacts of perceived e-collaboration service convenience on new product development in Taiwanese IC design companies," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 107-120, June.
    15. Rai Dipankar & Lin Chien-Wei & Hong JungHwa & Kulick George, 2017. "The influence of relationship beliefs on gift giving," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 12(4), pages 697-709, December.
    16. Pez, Virginie & Butori, Raphaëlle & de Kerviler, Gwarlann, 2015. "Because I'm worth it: The impact of given versus perceived status on preferential treatment effectiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2477-2483.
    17. Guido, Gianluigi & Pino, Giovanni & Peluso, Alessandro M., 2016. "Assessing individuals' re-gifting motivations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5956-5963.
    18. Yvan Barel & Sandrine Frémeaux, 2008. "Le don gratuit. Le cas d'un établissement public," Post-Print hal-00765468, HAL.
    19. Sun, Francis, 2016. "How to manage client entertainment in China," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(4), pages 401-410.
    20. de Hooge, Ilona E., 2014. "Predicting consumer behavior with two emotion appraisal dimensions: Emotion valence and agency in gift giving," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 380-394.
    21. Vanhamme, Joëlle & de Bont, Cees J.P.M., 2008. "“Surprise Gift” Purchases: Customer Insights from the Small Electrical Appliances Market," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 354-369.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kei:dpaper:2012-013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Global COE Program Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iekeijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.