IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/jmp/jm2019/psa1759.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cognitive and Structural Factors: What Makes Strategy Implementation so Hard?

Author

Listed:
  • Kelly Cristiny Chinelato Sacramento
  • Adalberto Americo Fischmann

Abstract

Good strategies do not guarantee business success, unless they are successfully implemented. It is possible to identify some recurring influential factors in the strategy implementation literature: some structural factors ("hard factors") that can be associated with routines, resources and decisions taken at institutional level that affect the behavior of individuals; and cognitive factors (âsoft factorsâ), which refer to the interpersonal processes, that have to be dealt with positive and negative processes and sanctions. The main objective of this research is to map and identify key obstacles and facilitators encountered by administrators at each influential factor in the implementation phase of planned business strategies. A quantitative research was designed, with managers of different hierarchical levels in large private companies headquartered in Brazil. Data was collected through a survey with an online questionnaire and data analysis includes the use of factor frequency analysis. The results show new empirical evidences and identifies potential gaps in the theory of strategic management, as well as managerial contributions.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelly Cristiny Chinelato Sacramento & Adalberto Americo Fischmann, 2019. "Cognitive and Structural Factors: What Makes Strategy Implementation so Hard?," 2019 Papers psa1759, Job Market Papers.
    • Handle: RePEc:jmp:jm2019:psa1759
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ideas.repec.org/jmp/2019/psa1759.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cândido, Carlos J F & Santos, Sérgio P, 2015. "Strategy implementation: What is the failure rate?," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 237-262, March.
    2. Rapert, Molly Inhofe & Velliquette, Anne & Garretson, Judith A., 2002. "The strategic implementation process: evoking strategic consensus through communication," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 301-310, April.
    3. Janis Forman & Paul A Argenti, 2005. "How Corporate Communication Influences Strategy Implementation, Reputation and the Corporate Brand: An Exploratory Qualitative Study," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(3), pages 245-264, October.
    4. Noble, Charles H., 1999. "Building the strategy implementation network," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 19-28.
    5. Sarah Kaplan, 2011. "Research in Cognition and Strategy: Reflections on Two Decades of Progress and a Look to the Future," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3), pages 665-695, May.
    6. Paul C. Nutt, 1987. "Identifying and appraising how managers install strategy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, January.
    7. Ho, Joanna L.Y. & Wu, Anne & Wu, Steve Y.C., 2014. "Performance measures, consensus on strategy implementation, and performance: Evidence from the operational-level of organizations," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 38-58.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tawse, Alex & Tabesh, Pooya, 2021. "Strategy implementation: A review and an introductory framework," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 22-33.
    2. Nagasimha Balakrishna Kanagal, 2016. "Issues in Marketing Strategy Implementation," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(11), pages 16-28, November.
    3. Adnan A. S. Alali, 2023. "Stimuli of Organization Citizenship Behavior and Performance: The Moderating Role of Organizational Strategy Awareness," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(1), pages 1-26, February.
    4. Cees B. M. Van Riel & Guido Berens & Majorie Dijkstra, 2009. "Stimulating Strategically Aligned Behaviour Among Employees," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(7), pages 1197-1226, November.
    5. Thomas Schaefer & Thomas Guenther, 2016. "Exploring strategic planning outcomes: the influential role of top versus middle management participation," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 205-249, May.
    6. Malshe, Avinash & Hughes, Douglas E. & Good, Valerie & Friend, Scott B., 2022. "Marketing strategy implementation impediments and remedies: A multi-level theoretical framework within the sales-marketing interface," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 824-846.
    7. Yildiz, H. Emre & Murtic, Adis & Zander, Udo, 2024. "Re-conceptualizing absorptive capacity: The importance of teams as a meso-level context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    8. Nuraddeen Abubakar Nuhu & Kevin Baird & Sophia Su, 2022. "The association between the interactive and diagnostic use of financial and non-financial performance measures with individual creativity: The mediating role of perceived fairness," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 371-402, September.
    9. Nicodemus M. Mutinda & James M. Kilika, 2019. "TMT Cognitive Capability and Organizational Outcomes: A Theoretical Review," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(8), pages 31-52, August.
    10. Leurent, Martin & Jasserand, Frédéric & Locatelli, Giorgio & Palm, Jenny & Rämä, Miika & Trianni, Andrea, 2017. "Driving forces and obstacles to nuclear cogeneration in Europe: Lessons learnt from Finland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 138-150.
    11. Zhiwei Yan & Xuerong Peng & Seoki Lee & Leibao Zhang, 2023. "How do multiple cognitions shape corporate proactive environmental strategies? The joint effects of environmental awareness and entrepreneurial orientation," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(4), pages 1592-1617, September.
    12. Jacobs, Mark A. & Yu, Wantao & Chavez, Roberto, 2016. "The effect of internal communication and employee satisfaction on supply chain integration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P1), pages 60-70.
    13. Patrick Spieth & Tobias Röth & Thomas Clauss & Christoph Klos, 2021. "Technological Frames in the Digital Age: Theory, Measurement Instrument, and Future Research Areas," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(7), pages 1962-1993, November.
    14. Lorino, Philippe & Mourey, Damien & Schmidt, Géraldine, 2017. "Goffman's theory of frames and situated meaning-making in performance reviews. The case of a category management approach in the French retail sector," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 32-49.
    15. Niittymies, Aleksi, 2020. "Heuristic decision-making in firm internationalization: The influence of context-specific experience," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(6).
    16. Anna M. Hansson & Eja Pedersen & Niklas P. E. Karlsson & Stefan E. B. Weisner, 2023. "Barriers and drivers for sustainable business model innovation based on a radical farmland change scenario," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 8083-8106, August.
    17. Ionel Bostan & Ionela-Corina Chersan & Magdalena Danileț & Mihaela Ifrim & Viorica Chirilă, 2020. "Investigations Regarding the Linguistic Register Used by Managers to Convey to Stakeholders a Positive View of Their Company, in the Context of the Business Sustainability Desideratum," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, August.
    18. Jarratt, Denise & Fayed, Ramzi, 2001. "The impact of market and organisational challenges on marketing strategy decision-making: a qualitative investigation of the business-to-business sector," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 61-72, January.
    19. Tawse, Alex & Tabesh, Pooya, 2023. "Thirty years with the balanced scorecard: What we have learned," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 123-132.
    20. Shahrooz Kavousi & Yashar Salamzadeh, 2016. "Identifying and Prioritizing Factors Influencing Success of a Strategic Planning Process: A Study on National Iranian Copper Industries Company," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(8), pages 230-230, August.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics
    • Y - Miscellaneous Categories

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jmp:jm2019:psa1759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RePEc Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ideas.repec.org/jmp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.