IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v21y2015i02p237-262_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategy implementation: What is the failure rate?

Author

Listed:
  • Cândido, Carlos J F
  • Santos, Sérgio P

Abstract

It is often claimed that 50–90% of strategic initiatives fail. Although these claims have had a significant impact on management theory and practice, they are controversial. We aim to clarify why this is the case. Towards this end, an extensive review of the literature is presented, assessed, compared and discussed. We conclude that while it is widely acknowledged that the implementation of a new strategy can be a difficult task, the true rate of implementation failure remains to be determined. Most of the estimates presented in the literature are based on evidence that is outdated, fragmentary, fragile or just absent. Careful consideration is advised before using current estimates to justify changes in the theory and practice. A set of guiding principles is presented for assisting researchers to produce better estimates of the rates of failure.

Suggested Citation

  • Cândido, Carlos J F & Santos, Sérgio P, 2015. "Strategy implementation: What is the failure rate?," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 237-262, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:21:y:2015:i:02:p:237-262_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367214000777/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eugster, Florian & Wagner, Alexander F., 2020. "Value reporting and firm performance," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    2. Ahmed, Umair & Carpitella, Silvia & Certa, Antonella, 2021. "An integrated methodological approach for optimising complex systems subjected to predictive maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    3. Leurent, Martin & Jasserand, Frédéric & Locatelli, Giorgio & Palm, Jenny & Rämä, Miika & Trianni, Andrea, 2017. "Driving forces and obstacles to nuclear cogeneration in Europe: Lessons learnt from Finland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 138-150.
    4. Romana P. Khokhar & Ather Akhlaq, 2023. "Differences and Similarities in Organizational Change Management and Neuroleadership Theories: A literature review," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 25-32.
    5. Meirbek Mazhitov & Md. Aftab Uddin & Monowar Mahmood & Alexandr Ostrovskiy, 2024. "Competitive Advantages Through Strategy Implementation: the Role of People, Plan, and Process," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 861-883, September.
    6. Rajesh K. Pillania, 2024. "Happiness Strategy for Competitiveness: A New Perspective to Compete," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 159-164, October.
    7. Wiston Mbhazima Baloyi & Lourens Johannes Erasmus Beyers, 2020. "The Perceptions of Senior Management with Regard to Strategy Implementation in the Limpopo Provincial Department of South Africa," Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 7(1), pages 62-70.
    8. repec:cfe:wpcefa:2016_01 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Kelly Cristiny Chinelato Sacramento & Adalberto Americo Fischmann, 2019. "Cognitive and Structural Factors: What Makes Strategy Implementation so Hard?," 2019 Papers psa1759, Job Market Papers.
    10. Leopold-Wildburger, Ulrike & Strohhecker, Jürgen, 2017. "Strategy map concepts in a balanced scorecard cockpit improve performanceAuthor-Name: Hu, Bo," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 664-676.
    11. Chen, Jeng-Chung & Yu, Vincent F., 2018. "Relationship between human error intervention strategies and unsafe acts: The role of strategy implementability," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 112-122.
    12. Steven E. Wallis, 2020. "Integrative Propositional Analysis for developing capacity in an academic research institution by improving strategic planning," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 56-67, January.
    13. Bienmali Kombate & Muganga Emmanuel & Kouadio Konan Richard, 2021. "The Implication of the Strategic Implementation Style and Middle Management Effort in Public Organization Strategic Management Implementation and Its Organizational Performance," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(1), pages 125-125, December.
    14. Philip Awino & James M. Kilika & Stephen M.A Muathe, 2022. "Organization health conceptualized as an emergent capability in a public sector reform program:Empirical and practical implications," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(2), pages 16-28, March.
    15. Mom, T.J.M., 2019. "Strategic Growth and Implementation: Thriving in a Disruptive Landscape," ERIM Inaugural Address Series Research in Management EIA 2019-076-S&E, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam..
    16. Oliveira Cidália & Martins Nayra & Rodrigues Margarida, 2024. "The Contribution of the BSC to Strategic Focus and Organisational Performance – Perception of the Mayor Export Companies in Portugal," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 16(2), pages 39-73.
    17. Jürgen Strohhecker, 2016. "Factors influencing strategy implementation decisions: an evaluation of a balanced scorecard cockpit, intelligence, and knowledge," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 89-119, February.
    18. Bies, Suzanne, 2022. "Examining the effectiveness of activation techniques on consumer behavior in temporary loyalty programs," Other publications TiSEM ade86df3-4846-4318-938f-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:21:y:2015:i:02:p:237-262_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.