IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/199302010800001247.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic Impacts of Porcine Somatotropin on a Farrow-to-Finish Hog Farm Operation

Author

Listed:
  • Govindasamy, Ramu
  • Liu, Donald
  • Kliebenstein, James

Abstract

Although somatotropins were discovered many years ago, only recent advances in recombinant DNA technology have made their mass production economically feasible. Somatotropins are growth hormones which occur naturally in animals. Their supplemental use in livestock production have been shown to increase animal productivity. For example, porcine somatotropin (PST) has the effect of improving the feed efficiency and carcass composition of pigs. Upon approval by the Food and Drug Administration, PST will become available to hog producers in the United States within the next few years.

Suggested Citation

  • Govindasamy, Ramu & Liu, Donald & Kliebenstein, James, 1993. "Economic Impacts of Porcine Somatotropin on a Farrow-to-Finish Hog Farm Operation," ISU General Staff Papers 199302010800001247, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:199302010800001247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/2f4f8123-f33f-4114-a8a0-943ea3c6c0d8/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harry M. Kaiser & Loren W. Tauer, 1989. "Impact of Bovine Somatotropin on U.S. Dairy Markets under Alternative Policy Options," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 11(1), pages 59-73.
    2. Catharine M. Lemieux & James W. Richardson, 1989. "Economic Impacts of Porcine Somatotropin on Midwest Hog Producers," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 11(2), pages 171-181.
    3. Catherine M. Lemieux & Michael K. Wohlgenant, 1989. "Ex Ante Evaluation of the Economic Impact of Agricultural Biotechnology: The Case of Porcine Somatotropin," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(4), pages 903-914.
    4. Kliebenstein, James & Buhr, Brian L. & Hayenga, Marvin L., 1989. "Economic Impacts of Technology Adoption: The Case of Pst," Staff General Research Papers Archive 11634, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    5. Kaiser, Harry M. & Scherer, Clifford W. & Barbano, David M., 1992. "Consumer Perceptions And Attitudes Towards Bovine Somatotropin," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 21(1), pages 1-11, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roka, Fritz M. & Hoag, Dana L., 1996. "Manure Value And Liveweight Swine Decisions," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(1), pages 1-10, July.
    2. Govindasamy, Ramu & Liu, Donald J. & Kliebenstein, James B., 1993. "Impacts Of Pst On Optimal Production And Marketing Decisions Of A Grow-Finish Hog Farm Operation," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 22(2), pages 1-9, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Govindasamy, Ramu & Liu, Donald J. & Kliebenstein, James, 1993. "Impacts of PST on Optimal Production and Marketing Decisions of a Grow-Finish Hog Farm Operation," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(2), pages 166-174, October.
    2. Kaiser, Harry M., 1992. "Market Impacts Of Bovine Somatropin: A Supply And Demand Analysis," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(1), pages 271-282, July.
    3. Caswell, Margriet F. & Fuglie, Keith O. & Klotz, Cassandra A., 1994. "Agricultural Biotechnology: An Economic Perspective," Agricultural Economic Reports 262025, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. McVey, Marty Jay, 1996. "Valuing quality differentiated grains from a total logistics perspective," ISU General Staff Papers 1996010108000012326, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    5. Kaiser, Harry M., 1990. "Bovine Somatotropin and Milk Production: Potential Impacts for the U.S," Staff Papers 121538, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    6. Richardson, James W. & Anderson, David P. & Peel, Derrell S. & Phillips, Mike, 1993. "Economic Incentives For Pst Adoption By Midwest Hog Producers," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 25(2), pages 1-11, December.
    7. Mullen, John D. & Alston, Julian M., 1995. "The Impact on the Australian Lamb Industry of Producing Larger Leaner Lamb," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 62(01), pages 1-19, April.
    8. Wang, Fude & Boisvert, Richard N. & Kaiser, Harry, 1992. "U.S. Dairy Policy Alternatives Under Bovine Somatotropin," Staff Papers 197594, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    9. Hafi, Ahmed & Reynolds, Russ & Rose, Roger, 1995. "Issues in estimating economic effects of a disease outbreak in poultry: The case of Newcastle disease," 1995 Conference (39th), February 14-16, 1995, Perth, Australia 170836, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    10. Strappazzon, Loris & Eigenraam, Mark & Wimalasuriya, Rukman & Stoneham, Gary, 2002. "Estimating Research Benefits When there is Input and Output Substitution: An Applied Analysis," 2002 Conference (46th), February 13-15, 2002, Canberra, Australia 125167, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    11. Lee, Hanbin & Sexton, Richard J. & Sumner, Daniel A., 2021. "Economics of Mandates on Farm Practices: Lessons from California’s Proposition 12 Regulations on Pork Sold in California," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 313920, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Kuchler, Fred & McCelland, john & Offutt, Susan E., 1989. "Regulating Food Safety: The Case of Animal Growth Hormones," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 12(3), September.
    13. Baker, Gregory A. & Burnham, Thomas A., 2001. "The Market For Genetically Modified Foods: Consumer Characteristics And Policy Implications," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 4(4), pages 1-10.
    14. Rola, Agnes C., 2000. "Economic Perspective for Agricultural Biotechnology Research Planning," Discussion Papers DP 2000-10, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    15. Tauer, Loren W., 1993. "Segmenting the Milk Market into bST-Produced and Non-bST-Produced Milk," Staff Papers 121326, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    16. Constantine, John H & Alston, Julian M & Smith, Vincent H, 1994. "Economic Impacts of the California One-Variety Cotton Law," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 102(5), pages 951-974, October.
    17. Dennis, Elliott J. & Schroeder, Ted C. & Renter, David G. & Pendell, Dustin L., 2018. "Value of Arrival Metaphylaxis in U.S. Cattle Industry," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 43(2), May.
    18. Tun-Hsiang Yu & C. Phillip Baumel & Connie L. Hardy & Marty J. McVey & Lawrence A. Johnson & Jerry L. Sell, 2001. "Impacts of six genetic modifications of corn on feed cost and consumption of traditional feed ingredients," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(1), pages 115-127.
    19. Zepeda, Lydia & Butler, Leslie J. & Carter, Harold O., 1991. "Simulating Bst Introduction In California For Dairy Policy Analysis," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 16(2), pages 1-10, December.
    20. Ambarawati, I Gusti Agung Ayu & Zhao, Xueyan & Griffith, Garry R. & Piggott, Roley R., 2003. "Distribution of Gains from Cattle Development in a Multi-Stage Production System: The Case of the Bali Beef Industry," 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia 57829, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:199302010800001247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.