IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/1991010108000010772.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The economics of food safety: an experimental approach

Author

Listed:
  • Shin, Seung Youll

Abstract

Food safety issues have received increased attention from scientific and consumer groups alike in recent years. Pathogenic microbiological agents have been shown to be a major contributor to food-borne illnesses in the United States. The presence and cost of these pathogens has become a major issue for policy makers, consumers, and producers;Estimated economic losses to society attributable to food-borne diseases have been large. These estimated losses usually have been based on direct consumer losses and likely represent an underestimation of the true economic costs. Morbidity costs, such as consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) to reduce their chance of becoming sick from a food-borne sickness, have not been included, leading to an underestimation of economic costs;With this in mind, this study focuses on developing an experimental approach which can be used to evaluate consumer WTP for safer food and willingness to accept (WTA) a typical unsafe food. Information on consumers' WTP and WTA for food safety is obtained through a nonhypothetical laboratory experimental approach. The often-observed divergences in WTP and WTA measures of market and nonmarket goods are examined and explained. A Vickrey second-price sealed-bid auction, with multiple trials, was used to elicit consumers' WTP and WTA values. Five food-borne pathogens were analyzed: Campylobacter, Salmonella, Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium perfringens, and Trichinella spiralis. Experiments were conducted on WTP and WTA for all five pathogens. Iowa State University students were the participants for each experiment. A new set of participants was used for each experiment;This study examined the disparity between WTP and WTA measures for a food item, a market good, and for food safety, a nonmarket good. Results showed that the disparity of these two measures is very small for perfect substitutes such as food and wealth. However, observed divergences were much larger for the imperfect substitutes such as food safety and wealth;The results indicate that WTP is more appropriate than WTA for food safety policy analysis. This provides a better estimate of society's WTP and the economic value of enhanced food safety measures. The WTP to completely remove food-borne pathogens from the U.S. food supply was estimated at 91 billion, a value which is far greater than that provided in previous research.

Suggested Citation

  • Shin, Seung Youll, 1991. "The economics of food safety: an experimental approach," ISU General Staff Papers 1991010108000010772, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:1991010108000010772
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/ef7243fe-455b-4724-b3c4-7c37bdb23f4f/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William Vickrey, 1961. "Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 16(1), pages 8-37, March.
    2. Tanya Roberts, 1989. "Human Illness Costs of Foodborne Bacteria," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(2), pages 468-474.
    3. Don Coursey, 1987. "Markets and the measurement of value," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 291-297, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lin, Kung-Cheng, 1993. "Demand for risky foods and food safety," ISU General Staff Papers 1993010108000011839, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Bocker, Andreas & Hanf, Claus-Hennig, 2000. "Confidence lost and -- partially -- regained: consumer response to food scares," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 471-485, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fox, John A. & Buhr, Brian L. & Shogren, Jason F. & Kliebenstein, James & Hayes, Dermot J., 1995. "Comparison of Preferences for Pork Sandwiches Produced from Animals With and Without Somatotropin Administration (A)," Staff General Research Papers Archive 852, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Brown, Jennifer & Cranfield, John A.L. & Henson, Spencer J., 2003. "Misassessed Risk In Consumer Valuation Of Food Safety: An Experimental Approach," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22194, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Fox, John Andrew, 1994. "Essays in the measurement of consumer preferences in experimental auction markets," ISU General Staff Papers 1994010108000012254, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    4. Shogren, Jason F., 2006. "Experimental Methods and Valuation," Handbook of Environmental Economics, in: K. G. Mäler & J. R. Vincent (ed.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 19, pages 969-1027, Elsevier.
    5. Hongpeng Guo & Zhihao Lv & Junyi Hua & Hongxu Yuan & Qingyu Yu, 2021. "Design of Combined Auction Model for Emission Rights of International Forestry Carbon Sequestration and Other Pollutants Based on SMRA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Paul Pezanis-Christou & Abdolkarim Sadrieh, 2003. "Elicited bid functions in (a)symmetric first-price auctions," Working Papers 85, Barcelona School of Economics.
    7. Ewerhart, Christian & Cassola, Nuno & Valla, Natacha, 2012. "Overbidding in fixed rate tenders: The role of exposure risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 539-549.
    8. Tafreshian, Amirmahdi & Masoud, Neda, 2022. "A truthful subsidy scheme for a peer-to-peer ridesharing market with incomplete information," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 130-161.
    9. Bogetoft, Peter & Nielsen, Kurt, 2003. "Yardstick Based Procurement Design In Natural Resource Management," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25910, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Shunda, Nicholas, 2009. "Auctions with a buy price: The case of reference-dependent preferences," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 645-664, November.
    11. Shrestha, Ratna K., 2017. "Menus of price-quantity contracts for inducing the truth in environmental regulation," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1-7.
    12. Palma, Marco A. & Ness, Meghan L. & Anderson, David P., 2015. "Buying More than Taste? A Latent Class Analysis of Health and Prestige Determinants of Healthy Food," 2015 Conference (59th), February 10-13, 2015, Rotorua, New Zealand 202566, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    13. Monteiro, Paulo Klinger, 2009. "First-price auction symmetric equilibria with a general distribution," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 256-269, January.
    14. Mishra, Debasis & Parkes, David C., 2007. "Ascending price Vickrey auctions for general valuations," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 335-366, January.
    15. Christoph Engel & Luigi Mittone & Azzurra Morreale, 2024. "Outcomes or participation? Experimentally testing competing sources of legitimacy for taxation," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 62(2), pages 563-583, April.
    16. Pablo Guillen & Róbert F. Veszteg, 2021. "Strategy-proofness in experimental matching markets," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(2), pages 650-668, June.
    17. Frank Kelly & Peter Key & Neil Walton, 2016. "Efficient Advert Assignment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(4), pages 822-837, August.
    18. John List & Jason Shogren, 1998. "The Deadweight Loss from Christmas: Comment," Artefactual Field Experiments 00531, The Field Experiments Website.
    19. Sprumont, Yves, 2013. "Constrained-optimal strategy-proof assignment: Beyond the Groves mechanisms," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 148(3), pages 1102-1121.
    20. Kent D. Messer & Todd M. Schmit & Harry M. Kaiser, 2005. "Optimal Institutional Mechanisms for Funding Generic Advertising: An Experimental Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 87(4), pages 1046-1060.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:1991010108000010772. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.