IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hnb/survey/42.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Which bite harder: new or old EU fiscal rules? Backcasting Croatian episode under the EDP

Author

Listed:
  • Frane Banić

    (Croatian National Bank, Croatia)

  • Milan Deskar-Škrbić

    (Croatian National Bank, Croatia)

  • Maroje Lang

    (Croatian National Bank, Croatia)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to explain the main features of the latest reform of the EU fiscal framework and to illustrate the differences between the new and old EU fiscal rules, using Croatia's experience during the Excessive Deficit Procedure (EDP) activated in 2014. Our results suggest that the new rules provide greater flexibility, allow for a longer fiscal adjustment, and mitigate the potential pro-cyclical nature of fiscal consolidation. The main limitation of our analysis are the difficulties related to the construction of a hypothetical scenario that would fully capture the political, economic, and institutional context surrounding the activation of the EDP in Croatia, or assumptions regarding the behaviour of fiscal policymakers in such a scenario. The paper nevertheless contributes to the ongoing debate on the implications of the reform of EU fiscal rules at both academic and policy levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Frane Banić & Milan Deskar-Škrbić & Maroje Lang, 2025. "Which bite harder: new or old EU fiscal rules? Backcasting Croatian episode under the EDP," Surveys 42, The Croatian National Bank, Croatia.
    • Handle: RePEc:hnb:survey:42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.hnb.hr/repec/hnb/survey/pdf/s-042.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    fiscal policy; fiscal rules; fiscal governance; debt sustainability analysis; Croatia; EDP;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E62 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Fiscal Policy; Modern Monetary Theory
    • F42 - International Economics - - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance - - - International Policy Coordination and Transmission
    • H60 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - General
    • H61 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Budget; Budget Systems
    • H62 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Deficit; Surplus
    • H63 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Debt; Debt Management; Sovereign Debt

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hnb:survey:42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Romana Sinković (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hnb.hr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.