IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-00905199.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Prévision du risque de crédit : Une étude comparative entre l'Analyse Discriminante et l'Approche Neuronale

Author

Listed:
  • Younes Boujelbène

    (UREA - FSEG Sfax)

  • Sihem Khemakhem

    (UREA - FSEG Sfax)

Abstract

Les organismes bancaires s'intéressent à évaluer le risque de la détresse financière avant l'octroi d'un crédit. Plusieurs chercheurs ont proposé l'emploi de modèles basés sur les réseaux de neurones en vue d'améliorer la prise de décision du banquier. L'objectif de cette recherche est d'explorer une nouvelle démarche pratique basée sur les réseaux de neurones en vue d'améliorer la capacité du banquier à prévoir le risque de non remboursement des entreprises demandant un crédit. Cette recherche est motivée par les insuffisances des modèles de prévision traditionnels. L'échantillon est composé de 86 entreprises tunisiennes et une batterie de 15 ratios financiers a été calculée sur la période 2005-2007. Les prévisions issues de la technique des réseaux de neurones sont comparées à celle de l'analyse discriminante. Les résultats de l'étude montrent que la technique "neuronale" est meilleure en termes de prévisibilité.

Suggested Citation

  • Younes Boujelbène & Sihem Khemakhem, 2013. "Prévision du risque de crédit : Une étude comparative entre l'Analyse Discriminante et l'Approche Neuronale," Working Papers hal-00905199, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00905199
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00905199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-00905199/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tam, KY, 1991. "Neural network models and the prediction of bank bankruptcy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 429-445.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Enrico Supino & Nicola Piras, 2022. "Le performance dei modelli di credit scoring in contesti di forte instabilit? macroeconomica: il ruolo delle Reti Neurali Artificiali," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(2), pages 41-61.
    2. Carlos Serrano-Cinca & Yolanda Fuertes-Call鮠 & Bego uti鲲ez-Nieto & Beatriz Cuellar-Fernᮤez, 2014. "Path modelling to bankruptcy: causes and symptoms of the banking crisis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(31), pages 3798-3811, November.
    3. Cao Son Tran & Dan Nicolau & Richi Nayak & Peter Verhoeven, 2021. "Modeling Credit Risk: A Category Theory Perspective," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Beata Gavurova & Sylvia Jencova & Radovan Bacik & Marta Miskufova & Stanislav Letkovsky, 2022. "Artificial intelligence in predicting the bankruptcy of non-financial corporations," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(4), pages 1215-1251, December.
    5. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2009_035 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Callen, Jeffrey L. & Kwan, Clarence C. Y. & Yip, Patrick C. Y. & Yuan, Yufei, 1996. "Neural network forecasting of quarterly accounting earnings," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 475-482, December.
    7. Demyanyk, Yuliya & Hasan, Iftekhar, 2010. "Financial crises and bank failures: A review of prediction methods," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 315-324, October.
    8. Parnes, Dror & Gormus, Alper, 2024. "Prescreening bank failures with K-means clustering: Pros and cons," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    9. Umair Bin YOUSAF & Khalil JEBRAN & Man WANG, 2022. "A Comparison of Static, Dynamic and Machine Learning Models in Predicting the Financial Distress of Chinese Firms," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(1), pages 122-138, April.
    10. Seyma Caliskan Cavdar & Alev Dilek Aydin, 2015. "An Empirical Analysis for the Prediction of a Financial Crisis in Turkey through the Use of Forecast Error Measures," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-18, August.
    11. Tomasz Korol, 2019. "Dynamic Bankruptcy Prediction Models for European Enterprises," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Teija Laitinen & Maria Kankaanpaa, 1999. "Comparative analysis of failure prediction methods: the Finnish case," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 67-92.
    13. Indro, D. C. & Jiang, C. X. & Patuwo, B. E. & Zhang, G. P., 1999. "Predicting mutual fund performance using artificial neural networks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 373-380, June.
    14. Romero Martínez, Mariano & Carmona Ibáñez, Pedro & Pozuelo Campillo, José, 2021. "Utilidad del Deep Learning en la predicción del fracaso empresarial en el ámbito europeo || The usefulness of Deep Learning in the prediction of business failure at the European level," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 32(1), pages 392-414, December.
    15. Ilyes Abid & Rim Ayadi & Khaled Guesmi & Farid Mkaouar, 2022. "A new approach to deal with variable selection in neural networks: an application to bankruptcy prediction," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 313(2), pages 605-623, June.
    16. Söhnke M. Bartram & Jürgen Branke & Mehrshad Motahari, 2020. "Artificial intelligence in asset management," Working Papers 20202001, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    17. Gruca, TS & Klemz, BR, 1998. "Using Neural Networks to Identify Competitive Market Structures from Aggregate Market Response Data," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 49-62, February.
    18. Borchert, Philipp & Coussement, Kristof & De Caigny, Arno & De Weerdt, Jochen, 2023. "Extending business failure prediction models with textual website content using deep learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 348-357.
    19. Barniv, Ran & Mehrez, Abraham & Kline, Douglas M., 2000. "Confidence intervals for controlling the probability of bankruptcy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 555-565, October.
    20. Marco Cantamessa & Valentina Gatteschi & Guido Perboli & Mariangela Rosano, 2018. "Startups’ Roads to Failure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    21. Greta Falavigna, 2006. "Models for Default Risk Analysis: Focus on Artificial Neural Networks, Model Comparisons, Hybrid Frameworks," CERIS Working Paper 200610, CNR-IRCrES Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Torino (TO) ITALY - former Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00905199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.