IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01405236.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La carte cognitive négociée : un outil efficace d'aide à la décision publique locale ?

Author

Listed:
  • Camille Guirou

    (LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

L'utilisation des cartes cognitives comme outil d'aide à la décision est à présent reconnue Cossette 2004). La carte cognitive négociée, en particulier, qui consiste à construire un consensus à travers le débat, pourrait se montrer utile pour favoriser la créativité et l'implémentation des décisions par les acteurs. Cependant, les structures des organisations peuvent avoir un impact sur les processus organisationnels (Simoni 2008). Les collectivités locales, qui ont à la fois certaines caractéristiques de la bureaucratie (Weber), disposent également d'espaces où s'installe l'anarchie organisée (Cohen, March, and Olsen 1972; Chevallier 1997; Huault 2009). Suite à une étude empirique dans trois communes, nous avons pu constater que ce cadre institutionnel, qui détermine les processus de décision, a un impact sur l'implémentation d'un outil cognitiviste. En effet, là où les procédures sont rigides, les cartes cognitives rencontrent des résistances fortes, tandis que là où l'organisation a des formes plus souples, plus informelles, des « slacks », ou « jeux dans les rouages » se forment, et la carte cognitive négociée devient bien plus efficace.

Suggested Citation

  • Camille Guirou, 2016. "La carte cognitive négociée : un outil efficace d'aide à la décision publique locale ?," Post-Print halshs-01405236, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01405236
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01405236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01405236/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gilles Jeannot & Luc Rouban, 2009. "Changer la fonction publique," Post-Print hal-00582836, HAL.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/12570 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Anne Rozan & Anne Stenger, 2000. "Intérêts et limites de la méthode du transfert de bénéfices," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 336(1), pages 69-78.
    4. Yves-André Perez, 2008. "La pratique de la recherche-intervention dans les organisations : retour sur les modes de production des connaissances gestionnaires à partir du terrain," Post-Print halshs-00952760, HAL.
    5. repec:hal:journl:dumas-00875698 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Florence Allard-Poesi, 1996. "Cartes Cognitives: Pour Ne Pas Jeter Le Bebe Avec L'Eau Du Bain," Post-Print hal-01490742, HAL.
    7. Isabelle Huault, 2009. "James March. Ambiguïté et déraison dans les organisations," Post-Print halshs-00671796, HAL.
    8. David, Albert, 2001. "Models implementation: A state of the art," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(3), pages 459-480, November.
    9. Mohammed, Susan & Ringseis, Erika, 2001. "Cognitive Diversity and Consensus in Group Decision Making: The Role of Inputs, Processes, and Outcomes," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 310-335, July.
    10. Simon, Herbert A, 1979. "Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(4), pages 493-513, September.
    11. Charles R. Schwenk, 1984. "Cognitive simplification processes in strategic decision‐making," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 111-128, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Camille Guirou, 2016. "La carte cognitive négociée : un outil susceptible de rétablir la confiance dans les collectivités territoriales ?," Post-Print halshs-01449361, HAL.
    2. Meinard, Y. & Tsoukiàs, A., 2019. "On the rationality of decision aiding processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 1074-1084.
    3. Meissner, Philip & Wulf, Torsten, 2017. "The effect of cognitive diversity on the illusion of control bias in strategic decisions: An experimental investigation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 430-439.
    4. Maggie Rong Hu & Xiaoyang Li & Yang Shi, 2019. "Adverse Selection and Credit Certificates: Evidence from a P2P Platform," Working Papers id:13038, eSocialSciences.
    5. Muchow, Kai-Christian & Müller-Stewens, Günter, 2015. "Professional service firms and their strategic renewal: Evidence from Germany’s legal advisory industry," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 69(3), pages 279-301.
    6. Hu, Maggie Rong & Li, Xiaoyang & Shi, Yang, 2019. "Adverse Selection and Credit Certificates: Evidence from a P2P Platform," ADBI Working Papers 942, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    7. Claude Paraponaris, 2017. "Plateformes numériques, conception ouverte et emploi," Post-Print halshs-01614430, HAL.
    8. Rausser, Gordon C. & de Janvry, Alain & Schmitz, Andrew & Zilberman, David D., 1980. "Principal issues in the evaluation of public research in agriculture," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt74v9m7dh, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    9. Olson, Bradley J. & Bao, Yongjian & Parayitam, Satyanarayana, 2007. "Strategic decision making within Chinese firms: The effects of cognitive diversity and trust on decision outcomes," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 35-46, March.
    10. DeCanio, Stephen J. & Watkins, William E., 1998. "Information processing and organizational structure," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 275-294, August.
    11. Das, Willy & Das, Satyasiba, 2018. "Role of Heuristic Principles On Crowd-Funder's Investment Decision Making," 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disruptive Change (Dubrovnik, 2018), in: 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disrupt, pages 443-452, Governance Research and Development Centre (CIRU), Zagreb.
    12. Ichiishi, Tatsuro, 1985. "Management versus ownership, II," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 115-138, March.
    13. Hugo Benítez-Silva & Debra Dwyer & Wayne-Roy Gayle & Thomas Muench, 2008. "Expectations in micro data: rationality revisited," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 381-416, March.
    14. Jérémy Vignal, 2012. "Destinataires et agents du changement : quels comportements adoptent les managers de proximité en contexte de changement ?," Post-Print halshs-01108454, HAL.
    15. Siegfried Berninghaus & Werner Güth & M. Vittoria Levati & Jianying Qiu, 2006. "Satisficing in sales competition: experimental evidence," Papers on Strategic Interaction 2006-32, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group.
    16. Ole Røgeberg & Morten Nordberg, 2005. "A defence of absurd theories in economics," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 543-562.
    17. Michaël Lainé, 2014. "Vers une alternative au paradigme de la rationalité ? Victoires et déboires du programme spinoziste en économie," Post-Print hal-01335618, HAL.
    18. Litsiou, Konstantia & Polychronakis, Yiannis & Karami, Azhdar & Nikolopoulos, Konstantinos, 2022. "Relative performance of judgmental methods for forecasting the success of megaprojects," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1185-1196.
    19. Bouzguenda, Karima, 2018. "Emotional intelligence and financial decision making: Are we talking about a paradigmatic shift or a change in practices?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 273-284.
    20. Haapalinna, Ilkka, 2003. "How to allocate funds within the army," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 224-233, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01405236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.