IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00849800.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La contamination perçue des produits : vers une meilleure compréhension de ses antécédents et de ses effets

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica Gerard

    (CERAG - Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion - UPMF - Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • A. Helme-Guizon

    (CERAG - Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion - UPMF - Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

L'avènement des produits en libre-service conduit les consommateurs à exercer davantage leur sens tactile. Si les recherches en marketing sensoriel ont montré l'intérêt de laisser les consommateurs manipuler librement les produits, il convient de nuancer ce constat. De récentes recherches se sont intéressées aux aspects négatifs du toucher et plus spécifiquement à la perception de contamination des produits. L'objectif de ce papier est de mieux cerner le phénomène de contamination. Des entretiens semi-directifs permettent de mettre en évidence les réponses d'ordre émotionnel, cognitif et comportemental suscitées lorsqu'un consommateur se retrouve confronté à un produit déjà manipulé.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica Gerard & A. Helme-Guizon, 2012. "La contamination perçue des produits : vers une meilleure compréhension de ses antécédents et de ses effets," Post-Print halshs-00849800, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00849800
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00849800
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00849800/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Citrin, Alka Varma & Stem, Donald Jr. & Spangenberg, Eric R. & Clark, Michael J., 2003. "Consumer need for tactile input: An internet retailing challenge," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 915-922, November.
    2. V. Maille, 2001. "L'influence des stimuli olfactifs sur le comportement du consommateur: un état des recherches," Post-Print hal-02018938, HAL.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3601 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/638 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Machleit, Karen A. & Eroglu, Sevgin A., 2000. "Describing and Measuring Emotional Response to Shopping Experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 101-111, August.
    6. Diana C. Robertson & Erin Anderson, 1993. "Control System and Task Environment Effects on Ethical Judgment: An Exploratory Study of Industrial Salespeople," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(4), pages 617-644, November.
    7. d'Astous, Alain, 2000. "Irritating Aspects of the Shopping Environment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 149-156, August.
    8. Sophie Rieunier, 2002. "Marketing sensoriel du point de vente," Post-Print halshs-00076600, HAL.
    9. Peck, Joann & Childers, Terry L, 2003. "Individual Differences in Haptic Information Processing: The "Need for Touch" Scale," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(3), pages 430-442, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pagani, Margherita & Racat, Margot & Hofacker, Charles F., 2019. "Adding Voice to the Omnichannel and How that Affects Brand Trust," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 89-105.
    2. Mihaela Åžtir & Adriana Zaiå¢, 2019. "Potential Impact Of Virtual Touching On Endowment And Feelings Of Ownership. A Literature Review Of Concepts And Scales," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 24, pages 145-162, December.
    3. Jan Vrána & Stanislav Mokrý, 2020. "Haptics and its Effect on Consumers' Intentions Using Neuroscientific Methods: Literature Review," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 68(2), pages 451-457.
    4. Liu, Wumei & Batra, Rajeev & Wang, Haizhogn, 2017. "Product Touch and Consumers’ Online and Offline Buying: The Role of Mental Representation," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 93(3), pages 369-381.
    5. Racat, Margot & Capelli, Sonia & Lichy, Jessica, 2021. "New insights into ‘technologies of touch’: Information processing in product evaluation and purchase intention," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    6. Ringler, Christine & Sirianni, Nancy J. & Gustafsson, Anders & Peck, Joann, 2019. "Look but Don’t Touch! The Impact of Active Interpersonal Haptic Blocking on Compensatory Touch and Purchase Behavior," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 95(4), pages 186-203.
    7. Walsh, Gianfranco & Shiu, Edward & Hassan, Louise M. & Michaelidou, Nina & Beatty, Sharon E., 2011. "Emotions, store-environmental cues, store-choice criteria, and marketing outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(7), pages 737-744, July.
    8. Beverland, Michael & Lim, Elison Ai Ching & Morrison, Michael & Terziovski, Mile, 2006. "In-store music and consumer-brand relationships: Relational transformation following experiences of (mis)fit," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(9), pages 982-989, September.
    9. Rosenbaum, Mark S. & Ramirez, Germán Contreras & Campbell, Jeffrey & Klaus, Philipp, 2021. "The product is me: Hyper-personalized consumer goods as unconventional luxury," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 446-454.
    10. Manolis, Chris & Nygaard, Arne & Stillerud, Bård, 1997. "Uncertainty and vertical control: An international investigation," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 6(5), pages 501-518, October.
    11. Rosa, José Antonio & Qualls, William J. & Ruth, Julie A., 2014. "Consumer creativity: Effects of gender and variation in the richness of vision and touch inputs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 386-393.
    12. Valérie-Inès de La Ville, 2009. "The child in the High Street store: elements to put things into perspective… [L’enfant dans l’espace commercial : éléments pour une mise en perspective]," Post-Print hal-01844025, HAL.
    13. Garaus, Marion & Wagner, Udo & Manzinger, Sandra, 2017. "Happy grocery shopper: The creation of positive emotions through affective digital signage content," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 295-305.
    14. Imschloss, Monika & Kuehnl, Christina, 2019. "Feel the Music! Exploring the Cross-modal Correspondence between Music and Haptic Perceptions of Softness," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 95(4), pages 158-169.
    15. Willems, Kim, 2022. "Brand personality appeal in retailing: Comparing fashion- and grocery retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    16. Wann-Yih Wu & Phan Thi Phu Quyen & Adriana A. Amaya Rivas, 2017. "How e-servicescapes affect customer online shopping intention: the moderating effects of gender and online purchasing experience," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 689-715, August.
    17. Gatignon, Aline & Gatignon, Hubert, 2010. "Erin Anderson and the Path Breaking Work of TCE in New Areas of Business Research: Transaction Costs in Action," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 232-247.
    18. González-Benito, Óscar & Martos-Partal, Mercedes & San Martín, Sonia, 2015. "Brands as substitutes for the need for touch in online shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 121-125.
    19. Carolina Bozzi & Marco Neves & Claudia Mont’Alvão, 2022. "Fashion E-Tail and the Impact of Returns: Mapping Processes and the Consumer Journey towards More Sustainable Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-39, April.
    20. Garaus, Marion & Wolfsteiner, Elisabeth & Wagner, Udo, 2016. "Shoppers' acceptance and perceptions of electronic shelf labels," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3687-3692.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00849800. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.