IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00687305.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Entrepreneuriat et innovations organisationnelles : pratiques et principes

Author

Listed:
  • Cécile Fonrouge

    (IRG - Institut de Recherche en Gestion - UPEM - Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée - UPEC UP12 - Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12)

Abstract

Les innovations de structure, systèmes et pratiques de gestion participent à une dynamique de changement qui les rendent dignes d'intérêt en entrepreneuriat. Trois cas d'innovations internes sont étudiés : un réseau d'entreprises, un système de numérisation des données de conception et des pratiques visant à concilier l'exploration et l'exploitation du potentiel technologique. Les conclusions portent sur l'effet organisationnel des choix technologiques et la place essentielle des entrepreneurs et du capital humain dans la capacité à redéfinir continuellement les tâches de chacun

Suggested Citation

  • Cécile Fonrouge, 2008. "Entrepreneuriat et innovations organisationnelles : pratiques et principes," Post-Print halshs-00687305, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00687305
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00687305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00687305/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cécile Fonrouge, 2007. "Relations externes et innovation. Le cas du secteur des biotechnologies," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 170(1), pages 117-133.
    2. Hornsby, Jeffrey S. & Kuratko, Donald F. & Zahra, Shaker A., 2002. "Middle managers' perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: assessing a measurement scale," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 253-273, May.
    3. Burgelman, Robert A. & Grove, Andrew S., 2007. "Let Chaos Reign, Then Rein In Chaos--Repeatedly: Managing Strategic Dynamics For Corporate Longevity," Research Papers 1954, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/6692 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Cécile Fonrouge, 2007. "Relations externes et innovation," Post-Print halshs-00691918, HAL.
    6. Koberg, Christine S. & Uhlenbruck, Nikolaus & Sarason, Yolanda, 1996. "Facilitators of organizational innovation: The role of life-cycle stage," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 133-149, March.
    7. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    8. Cécile Fonrouge & Cécile Ayerbe, 2005. "Les transitions entre innovations : études de cas et proposition d'une grille d'interprétation," Post-Print halshs-00696111, HAL.
    9. Ozgen, Eren & Baron, Robert A., 2007. "Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: Effects of mentors, industry networks, and professional forums," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 174-192, March.
    10. José Allouche & Isabelle Huault, 1998. "Contrôle, coordination et régulation:les nouvelles formes organisationnelles," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 1(2), pages 5-31, June.
    11. Harvey, Michael & Evans, Rodney, 1995. "Strategic windows in the entrepreneurial process," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 10(5), pages 331-347, September.
    12. Thomas Legrain & Olivier Basso, 2004. "La dynamique entrepreneuriale dans les grands groupes," Post-Print hal-00262950, HAL.
    13. Cécile Ayerbe & Cécile Fonrouge, 2005. "Les transitions entre innovations:études de cas et proposition d’une grille d’interprétation," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 8(2), pages 39-64, June.
    14. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2345 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Howell, Jane M. & Shea, Christine M. & Higgins, Christopher A., 2005. "Champions of product innovations: defining, developing, and validating a measure of champion behavior," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 641-661, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sylvie Sammut, 2008. "Variétés des formes d’accompagnement du créateur d’entreprise : quand la dimension interpersonnelle devient prégnante," Post-Print halshs-01244223, HAL.
    2. Swen Nadkarni & Reinhard Prügl, 2021. "Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 233-341, April.
    3. Stefan Schaltegger & Marcus Wagner, 2011. "Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: categories and interactions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(4), pages 222-237, May.
    4. Luigi Mosca & Martina Gianecchini & Diego Campagnolo, 2021. "Organizational life cycle models: a design perspective," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 10(1), pages 3-18, March.
    5. Gawke, Jason C. & Gorgievski, Marjan J. & Bakker, Arnold B., 2019. "Measuring intrapreneurship at the individual level: Development and validation of the Employee Intrapreneurship Scale (EIS)," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 806-817.
    6. R. Duane Ireland & Jeffrey G. Covin & Donald F. Kuratko, 2009. "Conceptualizing Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(1), pages 19-46, January.
    7. H.C. Menzel & R.Krauss & M.Weggeman, 2006. "Developing characteristics of an intrapreneurship-supportive culture," Working Papers 06-10, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies, revised Mar 2006.
    8. Jan Lampe & Priscilla Sarai Kraft & Andreas Bausch, 2020. "Mapping the Field of Research on Entrepreneurial Organizations (1937–2016): A Bibliometric Analysis and Research Agenda," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(4), pages 784-816, July.
    9. Gisela Casado Salguero & Manuel Ángel Fernández Gámez & Ignacio Aldeanueva Fernández & Daniel Ruíz Palomo, 2019. "Competitive Intelligence and Sustainable Competitive Advantage in the Hotel Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-12, March.
    10. Hyytinen, Ari & Pajarinen, Mika & Rouvinen, Petri, 2015. "Does innovativeness reduce startup survival rates?," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 564-581.
    11. Petra Andries & Dirk Czarnitzki, 2014. "Small firm innovation performance and employee involvement," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 21-38, June.
    12. Hui‐Ru Chi & Hsuan‐Pei Ho & Pei‐Kuan Lin, 2022. "Survival strategies of the sharing economy from the pandemic to a new normal: A dynamic capabilities approach," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(7), pages 3219-3234, October.
    13. Mair, Johanna, 2002. "How much do middle managers matter, really? An empirical study on their impact on sustained superior performance," IESE Research Papers D/473, IESE Business School.
    14. Cui, Yu & Jiao, Hao & Chen, Jin, 2020. "Critical review of: Lead and disrupt: How to solve the innovator's dilemma. Charles A. O’ Reilly III and Michael L. Tushman, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California (2016)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    15. Rafał Kusa & Marcin Suder & Belem Barbosa & Beata Glinka & Joanna Duda, 2022. "Entrepreneurial behaviors that shape performance in small family and non-family hotels during times of crisis," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 1545-1575, December.
    16. Christophe Favoreu & Christophe Maurel & Pierre Marin & David Carassus, 2016. "Analyse des interdépendances entre les différentes catégories d’innovation organisationnelle publique," Post-Print hal-02141971, HAL.
    17. Dean A. Shepherd & Vinit Parida & Joakim Wincent, 2021. "Bribery from a micro, demand-side perspective," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1661-1680, December.
    18. Jean-Philippe Vergne & Colette Depeyre, 2015. "How do firms adapt? A fuzzy-set analysis of the role of cognition and capabilities in U.S. defense firms’ responses to 9/11," Post-Print hal-01274005, HAL.
    19. Xia Feng & Sze-Ting Chen, 2024. "Break out against the tide: using ambidextrous networks and dynamic absorptive capacity to create greater value," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(3), pages 447-483, July.
    20. Masucci, Monica & Parker, Simon C. & Brusoni, Stefano & Camerani, Roberto, 2021. "How are corporate ventures evaluated and selected?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00687305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.