IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04569417.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Chapitre 18 Des preuves de concept aux preuves de soin

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Jobin

    (EPF-Ecole d'Ingénieurs Cachan)

  • Sophie Hooge

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Pascal Le Masson

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

La preuve de concept est une méthode d'expérimentation qui a été créée à la NASA dans les années 1960 pour gérer les inconnus organisationnels et techniques d'un « grand challenge » particulier : envoyer des hommes sur la Lune avant la fin de la décennie. Dans quelles mesures la preuve de concept peut aujourd'hui jouer un rôle dans les grands enjeux contemporains ? Autrement dit, en quoi les caractéristiques des preuves de concept peuvent être mises au service des enjeux qui ont trait à « soigner le monde » ? Ne pourraient-elles pas aider à rendre concret, opérationnel un tel projet de société visant à améliorer l'habitabilité du monde (Tronto, 2009) ? Ne pourraient-elles pas être des preuves par l'exemple que « la transition vers un monde durable, plus sobre, plus solidaire, plus juste et plus équitable, n'est pas un sacrifice, mais profondément désirable » (Robin, 2016) ? Les superpouvoirs des preuves de concept ne tiennent-ils pas dans leur capacité à requestionner des a priori, proposer de nouveaux imaginaires, révéler des capacités ou encore inspirer d'autres qui souhaitent s'engager ? Pour nous intéresser à ces questions, nous mobiliserons des travaux menés au sein de la Chaire de philosophie à l'hôpital du GHU Paris Psychiatrie et neurosciences ainsi que les travaux de la Chaire théorie et méthodes de la conception innovante et le Chaire théorie de l'entreprise de Mines Paris – PSL. Nous nous appuierons plus particulièrement sur les travaux réalisés par Timothée Boisseau, étudiant de l'option ingénierie de la conception de Mines Paris, dans le cadre de son stage de fin d'études.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Jobin & Sophie Hooge & Pascal Le Masson, 2024. "Chapitre 18 Des preuves de concept aux preuves de soin," Post-Print hal-04569417, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04569417
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04569417v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04569417v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abhijit Banerjee & Rukmini Banerji & James Berry & Esther Duflo & Harini Kannan & Shobhini Mukerji & Marc Shotland & Michael Walton, 2017. "From Proof of Concept to Scalable Policies: Challenges and Solutions, with an Application," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(4), pages 73-102, Fall.
    2. Charlotte Demonsant & Armand Hatchuel & Kevin Levillain & Blanche Segrestin, 2021. "De la ressource commune au péril commun : Repenser nos modèles de l'action climatique," Post-Print hal-03630940, HAL.
    3. Armand Hatchuel & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil & Daniel Carvajal-Perez, 2019. "Innovative Design Within Tradition - Injecting Topos Structures in C-K Theory to Model Culinary Creation Heritage," Post-Print hal-02291544, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Omar Al-Ubaydli & John List & Claire Mackevicius & Min Sok Lee & Dana Suskind, 2019. "How Can Experiments Play a Greater Role in Public Policy? 12 Proposals from an Economic Model of Scaling," Artefactual Field Experiments 00679, The Field Experiments Website.
    2. John A. List, 2024. "Optimally generate policy-based evidence before scaling," Nature, Nature, vol. 626(7999), pages 491-499, February.
    3. Julia Fischer-Mackey, 2024. "What Do Practitioners Want from Research? Exploring Ugandan and American Development Practitioners’ Interest in Research," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 24(1), pages 27-47, January.
    4. Masselus, Lise & Petrik, Christina & Ankel-Peters, Jörg, 2024. "Lost in the Design Space? Construct Validity in the Microfinance Literature," OSF Preprints nwp8k_v1, Center for Open Science.
    5. Sabrin Beg & Waqas Halim & Adrienne M. Lucas & Umar Saif, 2022. "Engaging Teachers with Technology Increased Achievement, Bypassing Teachers Did Not," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 14(2), pages 61-90, May.
    6. Daniel O. Gilligan & Naureen Karachiwalla & Ibrahim Kasirye & Adrienne M. Lucas & Derek Neal, 2022. "Educator Incentives and Educational Triage in Rural Primary Schools," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 57(1), pages 79-111.
    7. Singh, Abhijeet & Romero, Mauricio & Muralidharan, Karthik, 2024. "COVID-19 Learning loss and recovery," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt3jj1b8hb, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    8. Mo, Di & Bai, Yu & Shi, Yaojiang & Abbey, Cody & Zhang, Linxiu & Rozelle, Scott & Loyalka, Prashant, 2020. "Institutions, implementation, and program effectiveness: Evidence from a randomized evaluation of computer-assisted learning in rural China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    9. Rodriguez-Segura, Daniel & Campton, Cole & Crouch, Luis & Slade, Timothy S., 2021. "Looking beyond changes in averages in evaluating foundational learning: Some inequality measures," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    10. Herrera-Almanza, Catalina & Rosales-Rueda, Maria F., 2020. "Reducing the Cost of Remoteness: Community-Based Health Interventions and Fertility Choices," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    11. Agostinelli, Francesco & Avitabile, Ciro & Bobba, Matteo, 2021. "Enhancing Human Capital in Children: A Case Study on Scaling," TSE Working Papers 21-1196, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Oct 2023.
    12. Keijiro Otsuka, 2020. "Strategy for Cluster-Based Industrial Development in Developing Countries," Discussion Papers 2019, Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University.
    13. A Stefano Caria & Grant Gordon & Maximilian Kasy & Simon Quinn & Soha Osman Shami & Alexander Teytelboym, 2024. "An Adaptive Targeted Field Experiment: Job Search Assistance for Refugees in Jordan," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 22(2), pages 781-836.
    14. Andrew Dustan & Stanislao Maldonado & Juan Manuel Hernandez-Agramonte, 2018. "Motivating bureaucrats with non-monetary incentives when state capacity is weak: Evidence from large-scale field experiments in Peru," Working Papers 136, Peruvian Economic Association.
    15. Cristina Corduneanu-Huci & Michael T. Dorsch & Paul Maarek, 2017. "Learning to constrain: Political competition and randomized controlled trials in development," THEMA Working Papers 2017-24, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    16. Bobba, Matteo & Frisancho, Veronica & Pariguana, Marco, 2016. "Perceived Ability and School Choices: Experimental Evidence and Scale-up Effects," TSE Working Papers 16-660, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Jul 2024.
    17. Jörg Peters & Jörg Langbein & Gareth Roberts, 2018. "Generalization in the Tropics – Development Policy, Randomized Controlled Trials, and External Validity," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 33(1), pages 34-64.
    18. Mariella Gonzales & Gianmarco León-Ciliotta & Luis R. Martínez, 2022. "How Effective Are Monetary Incentives to Vote? Evidence from a Nationwide Policy," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(1), pages 293-326, January.
    19. Tahir Andrabi & Jishnu Das & Asim I. Khwaja & Selcuk Ozyurt & Niharika Singh, 2020. "Upping the Ante: The Equilibrium Effects of Unconditional Grants to Private Schools," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(10), pages 3315-3349, October.
    20. Sandeep Devanatha Pillai & Brent Goldfarb & David Kirsch, 2024. "Lovely and likely: Using historical methods to improve inference to the best explanation in strategy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(8), pages 1539-1566, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Preuve de concept; Preuve de soin;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04569417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.