IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04074841.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Renovating engineering departements' creation heritage to meet contemporary challenges: frugal validation patterns and constructive proof logics for new engineering rules

Author

Listed:
  • Nafissa Jibet

    (Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres, CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, SNCF Réseau [La Plaine st Denis])

  • Pascal Le Masson

    (Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres, CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Benoit Weil

    (Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres, CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Blandine Chazelle

    (SNCF Réseau [La Plaine st Denis])

  • Dominique Laousse

    (SNCF Réseau [La Plaine st Denis])

Abstract

Engineering departments design infrastructure by applying rule systems. The latter are an old creation heritage, based on decades of engineering, that makes it possible to design and govern the operation of the physical heritage which is the infrastructure. Replacing the infrastructure is not sustainable in the meaning of grand challenges; renovating it by applying engineering rules is but could appear too expensive. The literature highlights situations where renovation by respecting the state of the art is too costly and so is the validation of new renovation rules. Are there forms of frugal validation that allow for sustainable renovation of existing systems? This paper tries to explore a third way, a renovation of the physical heritage from a renovation of the system of rules, conceiving in the system of rules, new propositions, and their validation. Using the C-K theory, a case analysis was performed within the French national rail network manager (SNCF Network), a company that has a historical engineering heritage and is at the same time implementing a renovation of it. The paper shows that the renovation of engineering departments' creation heritage can go through frugal validation patterns and constructive proof logics.

Suggested Citation

  • Nafissa Jibet & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil & Blandine Chazelle & Dominique Laousse, 2023. "Renovating engineering departements' creation heritage to meet contemporary challenges: frugal validation patterns and constructive proof logics for new engineering rules," Post-Print hal-04074841, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04074841
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04074841v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04074841v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marc Gaudry & Bernard Lapeyre & Emile Quinet, 2016. "Infrastructure maintenance, regeneration and service quality economics: A rail example," PSE - Labex "OSE-Ouvrir la Science Economique" halshs-01380072, HAL.
    2. Thomas Gillier & Sylvain Lenfle, 2019. "Experimenting in the Unknown: Lessons from The Manhattan Project," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-03163267, HAL.
    3. Gaudry, Marc & Lapeyre, Bernard & Quinet, Émile, 2016. "Infrastructure maintenance, regeneration and service quality economics: A rail example," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 181-210.
    4. Ahmed, Hussam & Chateauneuf, Alaa, 2014. "Optimal number of tests to achieve and validate product reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 242-250.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nilsson, Jan-Eric & Odolinski, Kristofer, 2020. "When should infrastructure assets be renewed?: the economic impact of cumulative tonnes on railway infrastructure," Papers 2020:4, Research Programme in Transport Economics.
    2. Odolinski, Kristofer, 2019. "The impact of cumulative tonnes on track failures: An empirical approach," Papers 2019:1, Research Programme in Transport Economics.
    3. Odolinski, Kristofer & Wheat, Phill, 2018. "Dynamics in rail infrastructure provision: Maintenance and renewal costs in Sweden," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 21-30.
    4. Rufo, M.J. & Martín, J. & Pérez, C.J., 2016. "A Bayesian negotiation model for quality and price in a multi-consumer context," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 132-141.
    5. Cisnetto, Valentina & Barlow, James, 2020. "The development of complex and controversial innovations. Genetically modified mosquitoes for malaria eradication," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(3).
    6. Sonal, S.D. & Ammanagi, S & Kanjilal, O & Manohar, C.S., 2018. "Experimental estimation of time variant system reliability of vibrating structures based on subset simulation with Markov chain splitting," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 55-68.
    7. Shashank Gupta & Srinivas Kota & Rajesh P. Mishra, 2016. "Modeling and evaluation of product quality at conceptual design stage," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 7(1), pages 163-177, December.
    8. Quentin Plantec & Pascal Le Masson & Benoît Weil, 2022. "Nobel laurates and the role of the industry in the emergence of new scientific breakthroughs," Post-Print hal-03727378, HAL.
    9. Sohoin, Rodrigue & El Hami, Abdelkhalak & Guerin, Fabrice & Riahi, Hassen & Attaf, Djelali, 2021. "A novel approach based on meta-modeling technique and time transformation function for reliability analysis of upgraded automotive components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    10. Khalil, Y.F., 2019. "New statistical formulations for determination of qualification test plans of safety instrumented systems (SIS) subject to low/high operational demands," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 196-209.
    11. Mobin, Mohammadsadegh & Li, Zhaojun & Cheraghi, S. Hossein & Wu, Gongyu, 2019. "An approach for design Verification and Validation planning and optimization for new product reliability improvement," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Galvin, Peter & Burton, Nicholas & Nyuur, Richard, 2020. "Leveraging inter-industry spillovers through DIY laboratories: Entrepreneurship and innovation in the global bicycle industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    13. Gongyu Wu & Zhaojun (Steven) Li & Pan Liu, 2022. "Risk-informed reliability improvement optimization for verification and validation planning based on set covering modeling," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(2), pages 357-370, April.
    14. Kim, Kyungmee O. & Roh, Taeseong & Lee, Jae-Woo & Zuo, Ming J., 2016. "Derating design for optimizing reliability and cost with an application to liquid rocket engines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 13-20.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04074841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.