IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v28y2004i5p361-374.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scientific uncertainty and the International Whaling Commission: an alternative perspective on the use of science in policy making

Author

Listed:
  • Heazle, Michael

Abstract

Prior to the decline of the whaling industry in the 1960s, scientific uncertainty issues often were raised in the International Whaling Commission to argue against lower Antarctic quotas. But by the1970s, many of the same uncertainty issues were being reinterpreted by former whaling nations (and others) as good reasons for adopting a moratorium on all commercial whaling. This article argues that because science is unable to provide certainty, due to fundamental problems in its epistemology, the treatment of scientific advice by policy makers in the commission and elsewhere should be understood in relation to the utility it is believed to provide rather than simple claims of science's ability to provide truth or accuracy about the "real" world.

Suggested Citation

  • Heazle, Michael, 2004. "Scientific uncertainty and the International Whaling Commission: an alternative perspective on the use of science in policy making," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 361-374, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:28:y:2004:i:5:p:361-374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308-597X(03)00117-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Héloïse Berkowitz & Michael Grothe-Hammer, 2022. "From A Clash Of Social Orders To A Loss Of Decidability In Meta-Organizations Tackling Grand Challenges: The Case Of Japan Leaving The International Whaling Commission," Post-Print halshs-03271137, HAL.
    2. Héloïse Berkowitz & Larry B. Crowder & Cassandra M Brooks, 2020. "Organizational Perspectives On Oceans Governance: Meta-Organizations And Cross-Sectoral Collective Action," Post-Print hal-02872175, HAL.
    3. Héloïse Berkowitz, 2023. "From organizations as systems of ocean destruction to organizations as systems of ocean thriving," Post-Print hal-04005729, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:28:y:2004:i:5:p:361-374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.