IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02396928.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Le management stratégique en milieu public : entre approches rationnelle, politique et collaborative

Author

Listed:
  • David Carassus

    (CREG - Centre de recherche et d'études en gestion - UPPA - Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour)

  • Christophe Favoreu

    (CREG - Centre de recherche et d'études en gestion - UPPA - Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour)

  • Christophe Maurel

    (GRANEM - Groupe de Recherche Angevin en Economie et Management - UA - Université d'Angers - AGROCAMPUS OUEST - Institut National de l'Horticulture et du Paysage)

Abstract

Bien qu'expérimentés au sein des organisations publiques depuis plus d'une trentaine d'années, la planification et le management stratégique suscitent toujours un certain de nombre de questionnements et de doutes quant à leur capacité à améliorer la performance publique. L'objet de cet article est de s'interroger sur les processus de formation de la stratégie en milieu public et sur le type d'approche stratégique le plus en adéquation avec les caractéristiques de ce secteur. Pour ce faire, et dans un premier temps, une grille d'analyse théorique, fondée sur les trois principales approches de la stratégie dans le secteur public est élaborée. Dans un second temps, une étude cas exploratoire est conduite et met en évidence un processus stratégique complexe qui allie et alterne des logiques décisionnelles rationnelle, collaborative et politique, ainsi qu'un développement planifié et incrémental. Remarques à l'intention des praticiens : cette recherche met en évidence la nécessité de combiner différentes logiques et approches dans le pilotage stratégique des organisations publique : une logique rationnelle, une logique politique et une logique collaborative. Il est notamment souligné l'importance pour les managers publics de développer des compétences en matière de développement et de gestion de réseaux interorganisationnels et de relations interpersonnelles. La capacité à créer des interactions entre une diversité de parties prenantes, internes et externes, à mobiliser et orienter l'intelligence collective vers la définition et la mise en oeuvre de projets et de politiques publics représente une composante clé du management stratégique des organisations publiques.

Suggested Citation

  • David Carassus & Christophe Favoreu & Christophe Maurel, 2016. "Le management stratégique en milieu public : entre approches rationnelle, politique et collaborative," Post-Print hal-02396928, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02396928
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://univ-pau.hal.science/hal-02396928
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://univ-pau.hal.science/hal-02396928/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Romain Laufer & Armand Hatchuel & Albert David, 2012. "Les nouvelles fondations des sciences de gestion : éléments d'épistémologie de la recherche en management," Post-Print hal-01635115, HAL.
    2. Julien Batac & David Carassus, 2009. "Interactions between control and organisationnal learning in the case of a municipality: a comparative study with Kloot (1997)," Post-Print hal-02431111, HAL.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/11389 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Albert David, 2012. "Logique, épistémologie en sciences de gestion : trois hypothèses revisitées," Post-Print hal-01635114, HAL.
    5. John M Bryson, 2004. "What to do when Stakeholders matter," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 21-53, March.
    6. Pollitt, Christopher & Bouckaert, Geert, 2004. "Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199268498.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christophe Favoreu & David Carassus & Christophe Maurel, 2015. "Strategic management in the public sector: a rational, political or collaborative approach? [Le management stratégique en milieu public : approche rationnelle, politique ou collaborative ?]," Post-Print hal-02152509, HAL.
    2. David Carassus & Christophe Favoreu & Christophe Maurel, 2013. "Le management stratégique en milieu public, entre approches rationnelle, politique et collaborative : une étude de cas dans une collectivité locale," Post-Print hal-03082660, HAL.
    3. Pilonato, Silvia & Monfardini, Patrizio, 2020. "Performance measurement systems in higher education: How levers of control reveal the ambiguities of reforms," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(3).
    4. Bert George, 2017. "Does strategic planning ‘work’ in public organizations? Insights from Flemish municipalities," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(7), pages 527-530, November.
    5. Martin Luštický & Martin Musil, 2016. "Stakeholder-Based Evaluation of Tourism Policy Priorities: The Case of the South Bohemian Region," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2016(3), pages 3-23.
    6. Dietrich Budäus & Dennis Hilgers, 2009. "Reform des öffentlichen Haushalts- und Rechnungswesens in Deutschland," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 377-396, January.
    7. Jolanta MAJ, 2015. "Diversity Management’S Stakeholders And Stakeholders Management," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 780-793, November.
    8. Dixon, Keith, 2009. "Calculative practices in higher education: a retrospective analysis of curricular accounting about learning," MPRA Paper 18295, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Kemmerling, Achim & Bruttel, Oliver, 2005. "New politics in German labour market policy? The implications of the recent Hartz reforms for the German welfare state," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment SP I 2005-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    10. Franco-Trigo, L. & Fernandez-Llimos, F. & Martínez-Martínez, F. & Benrimoj, S.I. & Sabater-Hernández, D., 2020. "Stakeholder analysis in health innovation planning processes: A systematic scoping review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(10), pages 1083-1099.
    11. Tóth, Balázs, 2021. "Milyen kapcsolatban állnak a közszféra reformjai a gazdaságpolitikai paradigmákkal? [How reforms of the public sector relate to the paradigms of economic policy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 205-222.
    12. Cipolletta, Germano & Fiorani, Gloria & Matei, Ani & Matei, Lucica & Meneguzzo, Marco & Mititelu, Cristina, 2010. "Public Sector Modernization Trends of the Member States of European Union.Trajectories of reforms in Italy and Romania," Apas Papers 267, Academic Public Administration Studies Archive - APAS.
    13. Kik, M.C. & Claassen, G.D.H. & Meuwissen, M.P.M. & Smit, A.B. & Saatkamp, H.W., 2021. "Actor analysis for sustainable soil management – A case study from the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    14. Mark K. McBeth & Donna L. Lybecker & James W. Stoutenborough, 2016. "Do stakeholders analyze their audience? The communication switch and stakeholder personal versus public communication choices," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 49(4), pages 421-444, December.
    15. Bellò, Benedetta & Spano, Alessandro, 2015. "Governing the purple zone: How politicians influence public managers," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 354-365.
    16. Deborah Wilson, 2011. "Comparative Analysis in Public Management," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 293-308, February.
    17. Independent Evaluation Group, 2008. "Public Sector Reform: What Works and Why? An IEG evaluation of World Bank Support," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6484.
    18. Alessio Conti & Giovanni Vetritto, 2019. "ICT from Below: ELISA Program and the Innovation of Local Government in Italy," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 7(3), pages 70-92, May.
    19. Goddard, Andrew, 2021. "Accountability and accounting in the NGO field comprising the UK and Africa – A Bordieusian analysis," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    20. Yuzhakov, Vladimir (Южаков, Владимир) & Startsev, Y (Старцев, Я.), 2015. "Development of a Concept of an Interdisciplinary Research Program of Formation of Complex Methodologies and Techniques of Management Development in Public Administration [Разработка Концепции Межди," Published Papers mn37, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02396928. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.