IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02313756.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Créer un espace d'entrepreneuriat culturel et créatif : le cas du Centquatre

Author

Listed:
  • Aurore Haas

    (SKEMA Business School)

  • Alexis Pokrovsky

    (ISC Paris - Institut Supérieur du Commerce de Paris)

Abstract

Le secteur culturel français est confronté à des bouleversements économiques et institutionnels majeurs. L'entrepreneuriat culturel et créatif semble une voie prometteuse pour répondre à ces enjeux. Cependant, son accompagnement pose question:en effet il suppose de concilier les impératifs de la création artistique avec la logique économique d'exploitation d'une opportunité. Les recherches récentes sur l'accompagnement soulignent la nécessité de créer des dispositifs organisationnels et matériels adaptés permettant de développer les compétences,à l'instar des communautés de makers et des espaces de co-working. Or, la nature matérielle des dispositifs d'accompagnement est peu étudiée. En traitant la nature matérielle sous l'angle de deux dimensions, le lieu et les proximités, notre article se propose ainsi d'étudier le rôle des dispositifs matériels sur l'accompagnement des activités entrepreneuriales dans le cadre d'un incubateur du secteur créatif et culturel.L'étude de cas porte sur un cas unique en France, le 104Factory, un incubateur situé à Paris et rattaché à un établissement culturel, le 104. Notre recherche s'appuie sur une série d'entretiens menés avec des entrepreneurs hébergés au 104Factory. Notre étude met en évidence le rôle ambidextre des proximités et du lieu dans l'accompagnement des entrepreneurs culturels et créatifs.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurore Haas & Alexis Pokrovsky, 2018. "Créer un espace d'entrepreneuriat culturel et créatif : le cas du Centquatre," Post-Print hal-02313756, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02313756
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02313756
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-02313756/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sean M. Hackett & David M. Dilts, 2004. "A Systematic Review of Business Incubation Research," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 55-82, January.
    2. Julie Fabbri & Florence Charue-Duboc, 2013. "Un modèle d’accompagnement entrepreneurial fondé sur des apprentissages au sein d’un collectif d’entrepreneurs : le cas de La Ruche," Post-Print hal-02312091, HAL.
    3. Annet Jantien Smit, 2011. "The Influence of District Visual Quality on Location Decisions of Creative Entrepreneurs," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(2), pages 167-184, April.
    4. Filipe M. Santos & Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, 2005. "Organizational Boundaries and Theories of Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(5), pages 491-508, October.
    5. Julie Fabbri & Florence Charue-Duboc, 2013. "Un modèle d’accompagnement entrepreneurial fondé sur des apprentissages au sein d’un collectif d’entrepreneurs : le cas de La Ruche," Post-Print hal-01889408, HAL.
    6. Mitchell, J. Robert & Shepherd, Dean A., 2010. "To thine own self be true: Images of self, images of opportunity, and entrepreneurial action," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 138-154, January.
    7. Didier Chabaud & Karim Messeghem & Sylvie Sammut, 2010. "Vers de nouvelles formes d'accompagnement ?," Revue de l'Entrepreneuriat, De Boeck Université, vol. 9(2), pages 1-5.
    8. Alain Rallet & André Torre, 2004. "Proximité et localisation," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 280(1), pages 25-41.
    9. Richard Swedberg, 2006. "The cultural entrepreneur and the creative industries: beginning in Vienna," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 30(4), pages 243-261, December.
    10. Ron Boschma, 2005. "Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 61-74.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sonia Adam-Ledunois & Jérôme Guédon & Sophie Renault, 2008. "Les Parcs Industriels Fournisseurs ou le choix de la proximité géographique," Post-Print halshs-00691127, HAL.
    2. Angelo Cavallo & Antonio Ghezzi & Cristina Rossi-Lamastra, 2021. "Small-medium enterprises and innovative startups in entrepreneurial ecosystems: exploring an under-remarked relation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1843-1866, December.
    3. Criaco, Giuseppe & van Oosterhout, J. (Hans) & Nordqvist, Mattias, 2021. "Is blood always thicker than water? Family firm parents, kinship ties, and the survival of spawns," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(6).
    4. Basile Michel, 2019. "Coworking, between openness and closure of non-profit and community spaces [El coworking, entre la apertura y el cierre de espacios asociativos y comunitarios]," Post-Print halshs-02176470, HAL.
    5. Christophe Schmitt & Ruphin Ndjambou & Julien Husson, 2016. "L'accompagnement entrepreneurial : Proposition d'une lecture critique," Post-Print hal-02989734, HAL.
    6. Good, Matthew & Knockaert, Mirjam & Soppe, Birthe & Wright, Mike, 2019. "The technology transfer ecosystem in academia. An organizational design perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 82, pages 35-50.
    7. Frank J. Van Rijnsoever & Marijn A. Van Weele & Chris P. Eveleens, 0. "Network brokers or hit makers? Analyzing the influence of incubation on start-up investments," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-25.
    8. Hanisch, David N. & Rau, Sabine B., 2014. "Application of metric conjoint analysis in family business research," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 72-84.
    9. Margarida Madaleno & Max Nathan & Henry Overman & Sevrin Waights, 2022. "Incubators, accelerators and urban economic development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(2), pages 281-300, February.
    10. Shi, Xianwei & Liang, Xingkun & Luo, Yining, 2023. "Unpacking the intellectual structure of ecosystem research in innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    11. Gadille, Martine & MÉhaut, Philippe & courault, Bruno, 2013. "Compétences et régulation des marchés du travail dans les pôles de compétitivité : le cas du pôle Pégase," Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Editions NecPlus, vol. 2013(02), pages 339-361, June.
    12. Frank J. Van Rijnsoever & Marijn A. Van Weele & Chris P. Eveleens, 2017. "Network brokers or hit makers? Analyzing the influence of incubation on start-up investments," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 605-629, June.
    13. Ellen Siu, 2018. "Interorganisational collaboration in Academic Health Science Centre: A case study on King’s Health Partnership," Working Papers 40, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Feb 2021.
    14. Murzyn-Kupisz Monika & Działek Jarosław, 2019. "Economic and spatial strategies of artists as cultural entrepreneurs," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 38(4), pages 29-47, December.
    15. Etienne Capron & Dominique Sagot-Duvauroux & Raphaël Suire, 2020. "Anatomy of a techno-creative community : the role of places and events in the emergence of videomapping in Nantes," Working Papers hal-02617101, HAL.
    16. Alfonso Unceta & Xabier Barandiaran & Asier Lakidain, 2021. "Digitalisation of Creative Industries Fostered by Collaborative Governance: Public Innovation Labs in Gipuzkoa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Han, Shaojie & Su, Jingqin & Lyu, Yibo & Liu, Qing, 2022. "How do business incubators govern incubation relationships with different new ventures?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    18. Mingfeng Tang & Grace Sheila Walsh & Cuiwen Li & Angathevar Baskaran, 2021. "Exploring technology business incubators and their business incubation models: case studies from China," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 90-116, February.
    19. Lorenzo Ciapetti, 2011. "Technological Change, Knowledge Integration and Adaptive Processes: The Mechatronic Evolution of the Reggio Emilia District," Chapters, in: Paul L. Robertson & David Jacobson (ed.), Knowledge Transfer and Technology Diffusion, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Vinko Muštra & Blanka Šimundić & Zvonimir Kuliš, 2020. "Does innovation matter for regional labour resilience? The case of EU regions," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(5), pages 955-970, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    entrepreneur; accompagnement; proximité; incubateur;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02313756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.