IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02050138.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Le marketing de la collecte de legs: de la légitimité à proposer l'immortalité à la gestion relationnelle

Author

Listed:
  • Sophie Rieunier

    (IAE Paris - Sorbonne Business School)

  • Géraldine Michel

    (IAE Paris - Sorbonne Business School)

Abstract

Associations de solidarité, établissements d'enseignement supérieurs et institutions culturelles ont de plus en plus de besoins financiers et de moins en moins de subventions publiques. La collecte de fonds devient alors fondamentale pour leur survie. Cet article a pour objectif d'identifier les leviers de la collecte de legs à travers une étude qualitative réalisée auprès de 21 professionnels de la collecte. Les résultats montrent le rôle déterminant de la légitimité à « offrir l'immortalité » et l'importance de la relation nouée entre l'organisation et le testateur potentiel. Enfin, les implications organisationnelles et éthiques de la collecte de legs sont identifiées. Mots-clés : donateurs, don, legs, marketing relationnel, collecte de fonds. Abstract ThE LEgaCy markETing: from ThE LEgiTimaCy of "immorTaLiTy offEr" To ThE rELaTionship managEmEnT Charities, universities and cultural institutions have greater and greater financial need and less and less public funding. fundraising has thus become fundamental to their survival. The purpose of this article is to analyse the marketing of bequests through "face to face" interviews with fundraisers specialized in planned giving. in particular, this research shows the determining roles of legitimacy to "propose immortality" and the importance of the relationship formed between the organisation and the potential donor. finally, the organisational and ethical implications of bequests are identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Sophie Rieunier & Géraldine Michel, 2013. "Le marketing de la collecte de legs: de la légitimité à proposer l'immortalité à la gestion relationnelle," Post-Print hal-02050138, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02050138
    DOI: 10.7193/dm.069.61.75
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02050138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-02050138/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.7193/dm.069.61.75?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raphaëlle Butori, 2010. "Pour une meilleure utilisation du traitement de faveur: une approche individuelle," Post-Print hal-02055241, HAL.
    2. Géraldine Michel & Jean-François Vergne, 2000. "Un outil de communication pour la distribution : le magazine de consommateurs," Post-Print halshs-02923689, HAL.
    3. Denis Guiot & Bertrand Urien, 2007. "Attitude face à la mort et comportement d'ajustement des consommateurs âgés : vers l'élaboration d'une réponse marketing," Post-Print halshs-00344879, HAL.
    4. Matthew Thomson & Deborah J. Macinnis & C. Whan Park, 2005. "Les liens attachants : Mesurer la force de l'attachement émotionnel des consommateurs à la marque," Post-Print hal-02023559, HAL.
    5. repec:dau:papers:123456789/408 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Bertrand Urien & Denis Guiot, 2007. "Attitude face à la mort et comportement d'ajustement des consommateurs âgés : Vers l'élaboration d'une réponse marketing," Post-Print halshs-00169171, HAL.
    7. repec:dau:papers:123456789/7857 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Aaker, Jennifer L. & Akutsu, Satoshi, 2009. "Why Do People Give? The Role of Identity in Giving," Research Papers 2027, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael E. Cummings & Hans Rawhouser & Silvio Vismara & Erin L. Hamilton, 2020. "An equity crowdfunding research agenda: evidence from stakeholder participation in the rulemaking process," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 907-932, April.
    2. Bryan Bollinger & Song Yao, 2018. "Risk transfer versus cost reduction on two-sided microfinance platforms," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 251-287, September.
    3. Bullard, Olya & Penner, Sara, 2017. "A regulatory-focused perspective on philanthropy: Promotion focus motivates giving to prevention-framed causes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 173-180.
    4. Valérie Guillard & Eva Delacroix, 2012. ""J'espère que ce commerçant ne me parlera pas !" : l'effet de l'anxiété sociale et du degré d'intimité de la conversation sur l'intention de revenir dans le point de vente," Post-Print hal-01630516, HAL.
    5. Thompson, Scott A. & Kim, Molan & Loveland, James M. & Lacey, Russell & Castro, Iana A., 2017. "Consumer Communities Do Well, But Will They Do Good? A Study of Participation in Distributed Computing Projects," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 32-43.
    6. Jean-Pierre Helfer & Géraldine Michel, 2006. "La stratégie de contacts multicanal : opportunités, risques et facteurs clés de succès," Post-Print hal-02049875, HAL.
    7. Shuangfa Huang & David Pickernell & Martina Battisti & Thang Nguyen, 2022. "Signalling entrepreneurs’ credibility and project quality for crowdfunding success: cases from the Kickstarter and Indiegogo environments," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1801-1821, April.
    8. Llamas, Rosa & Thomsen, Thyra Uth, 2016. "The luxury of igniting change by giving: Transforming yourself while transforming others' lives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 166-176.
    9. Cyrielle Vellera & Elodie Jouny-Rivier & Aurélie Hemonnet-Goujot, 2023. "Crowdsourcing innovation challenges: How participants react when their ideas are rejected," Post-Print hal-03841105, HAL.
    10. van Dijk, Mathilde & Van Herk, Hester & Prins, Remco, 2019. "Choosing your charity: The importance of value congruence in two-stage donation choices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 283-292.
    11. Ahmet Ekici & Aminreza Shiri, 2018. "The message in the box: how exposure to money affects charitable giving," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 137-149, June.
    12. Laurentiu-Cristian Ciobotaru & Sul Kim & Arthur Soest, 2021. "Household Preferences for Investing in Crowdfunding," De Economist, Springer, vol. 169(4), pages 499-522, November.
    13. Reed, Americus & Forehand, Mark R. & Puntoni, Stefano & Warlop, Luk, 2012. "Identity-based consumer behavior," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 310-321.
    14. Son K. Lam, 2012. "Identity-motivated marketing relationships: research synthesis, controversies, and research agenda," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 2(2), pages 72-87, December.
    15. Mihaly Nikolett, 2018. "The Possible Use of Akerlof and Kranton’s Utility Model in Higher Education," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 138-150, March.
    16. Tang, Linyao, 2010. "放任与管制的或此或彼：俄罗斯市场转型录 [Totalitarianism and Laissez-faire: A meditation on Russian Market]," MPRA Paper 26201, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 07 Jul 2010.
    17. Ghislaine Pellat & Fanny Poujol & B. Siadou-Martin, 2010. "L'orientation client du vendeur du point de vue du consommateur : les apports de la théorie de l'attachement," Post-Print halshs-00511849, HAL.
    18. Silke Boenigk & Marcel Lee Mayr, 2016. "The Happiness of Giving: Evidence from the German Socioeconomic Panel That Happier People Are More Generous," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1825-1846, October.
    19. Sanjay Singh & Yogita Aggarwal, 2018. "Happiness at Work Scale: Construction and Psychometric Validation of a Measure Using Mixed Method Approach," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 1439-1463, June.
    20. R. Bret Leary & Rhiannon MacDonnell Mesler & Bonnie Simpson & Matthew D. Meng & William Montford, 2022. "Effects of perceived scarcity on COVID‐19 consumer stimulus spending: The roles of ontological insecurity and mutability in predicting prosocial outcomes," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), pages 1046-1061, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02050138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.