IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01865906.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Design Thinking et Théorie U : vers une nouvelle ingénierie des espaces de discussion pour développer le mieux-être au travail ?

Author

Listed:
  • Cathy Briest Breda

    (INSEEC - Institut des hautes études économiques et commerciales | School of Business and Economics)

  • Damien Richard Richard

    (INSEEC - Institut des hautes études économiques et commerciales | School of Business and Economics)

  • Zahir Yanat

    (Kedge Business School [Talence])

Abstract

This article highlights a discussion area engineering that helps develop well-being at work. By combining Design Thinking and Theory U (Sharmer, 2007), the notion of discussion area is envisaged as a creative problem-solving facility. Such areas allow employees to create the conditions to enhance well-being at work: stakeholders construct meaning together in their work, share emotional experiences from a regulatory perspective and deploy their power to act. The methodology is based on a cooperative intervention research conducted over two years with an SME in the automotive industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Cathy Briest Breda & Damien Richard Richard & Zahir Yanat, 2017. "Design Thinking et Théorie U : vers une nouvelle ingénierie des espaces de discussion pour développer le mieux-être au travail ?," Post-Print hal-01865906, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01865906
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01865906
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01865906/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ikujiro Nonaka, 1994. "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 14-37, February.
    2. Vassili Joannides, 2011. "Insiders/Outsiders : Influences De La Pré- Connaissance Sur Le Design De Recherche En Sciences De Gestion," Post-Print hal-00676548, HAL.
    3. Emmanuel Abord de Chatillon & Damien Richard Richard, 2015. "Du sens, du lien, de l’activité et du confort (SLAC). Proposition pour une modélisation des conditions du bien-être au travail par le SLAC," Post-Print hal-02000675, HAL.
    4. Vassili Joannides, 2011. "Influences de la pré-connaissance sur le design de la recherche:le cas des liens entre comptabilité et gestion," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 14(4), pages 91-127, December.
    5. Thierry Colin & Benoît Grasser & Ewan Oiry, 2013. "Les dispositifs RH dans la fabrique du sens d'une décision stratégique," Post-Print hal-01369249, HAL.
    6. Vassili Joannides, 2011. "Insiders/Outsiders : Influences De La Pré- Connaissance Sur Le Design De Recherche En Sciences De Gestion," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-00676548, HAL.
    7. Taylor, Frederick Winslow, 1911. "The Principles of Scientific Management," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number taylor1911.
    8. Emmanuel Abord de Chatillon & Damien Richard, 2015. "Du sens, du lien, de l'activité et de confort (SLAC). Proposition pour une modélisation des conditions du bien-être au travail par le SLAC," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(4), pages 53-71.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Damien Collard, 2019. "Explore and manage discussion spaces for talking about work [Explorer et gérer les espaces de discussion sur le travail]," Post-Print hal-02453853, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kelman, Steven, 2006. "Organization Design and Frontline Service Improvement in Government: The Case of Performance Targets in the United Kingdom," Working Paper Series rwp06-016, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    2. Davis, Donna F. & Mentzer, John T., 2007. "Organizational factors in sales forecasting management," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 475-495.
    3. Mark F. Peterson, 1998. "Embedded Organizational Events: The Units of Process in Organization Science," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(1), pages 16-33, February.
    4. Emmanuel Abord de Chatillon & Tarik Chakor, 2021. "Santé au travail et ressources humaines - Nouveaux chantiers, nouveaux défis," Post-Print hal-03561861, HAL.
    5. David Vallat, 2015. "Une alternative au dualisme État-Marché : l’économie collaborative, questions pratiques et épistémologiques," Working Papers halshs-01249308, HAL.
    6. François Therin, 2003. "Learning-based Strategy, Toward a New Model of Strategic Behaviour," Post-Print hal-00451450, HAL.
    7. Robert S. Huckman & Bradley R. Staats, 2008. "Variation in Experience and Team Familiarity: Addressing the Knowledge Acquisition-Application Problem," Harvard Business School Working Papers 09-035, Harvard Business School.
    8. David Vallat, 2016. "From knowledge as a commons to organization as a commons," Post-Print hal-03301430, HAL.
    9. Lu, Jinfeng & Dimov, Dimo, 2023. "A system dynamics modelling of entrepreneurship and growth within firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3).
    10. Olunifesi Adekunle Suraj, 2016. "Managing Telecommunications for Development: An Analysis of Intellectual Capital in Nigerian Telecommunication Industry," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(01), pages 1-30, March.
    11. Soufiane Mezzourh & Walid A Nakara, 2009. "Governance and innovation : A Knowledge-based approach [La gouvernance de l'innovation : une approche par la connaissance]," Post-Print halshs-01955966, HAL.
    12. M. Max Evans & Ilja Frissen & Anthony K. P. Wensley, 2018. "Organisational Information and Knowledge Sharing: Uncovering Mediating Effects of Perceived Trustworthiness Using the PROCESS Approach," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-29, March.
    13. Duniesky Feitó Madrigal & Alejandro Mungaray Lagarda & Michelle Texis Flores, 2016. "Factors associated with learning management in Mexican micro-entrepreneurs," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, vol. 32(141), pages 381-386, December.
    14. Yildiz, H. Emre & Murtic, Adis & Zander, Udo, 2024. "Re-conceptualizing absorptive capacity: The importance of teams as a meso-level context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    15. Gaviria-Marin, Magaly & Merigó, José M. & Baier-Fuentes, Hugo, 2019. "Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 194-220.
    16. Christoph P. Kiefer & Pablo Del Río González & Javier Carrillo‐Hermosilla, 2019. "Drivers and barriers of eco‐innovation types for sustainable transitions: A quantitative perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 155-172, January.
    17. Jeremy Atack & Robert A. Margo & Paul Rhode, 2020. "‘Mechanization Takes Command’: Inanimate Power and Labor Productivity in Late Nineteenth Century American Manufacturing," NBER Working Papers 27436, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Ahammad, Mohammad Faisal & Tarba, Shlomo Yedidia & Liu, Yipeng & Glaister, Keith W., 2016. "Knowledge transfer and cross-border acquisition performance: The impact of cultural distance and employee retention," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 66-75.
    19. Liuan Wang & Lu (Lucy) Yan & Tongxin Zhou & Xitong Guo & Gregory R. Heim, 2020. "Understanding Physicians’ Online-Offline Behavior Dynamics: An Empirical Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 537-555, June.
    20. Schilling, Melissa A. & Green, Elad, 2011. "Recombinant search and breakthrough idea generation: An analysis of high impact papers in the social sciences," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(10), pages 1321-1331.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01865906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.