IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01809647.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Defining health standards through economic optimisation: The example of colostrum management in beef and dairy production

Author

Listed:
  • Didier Raboisson

    (IHAP - Interactions hôtes-agents pathogènes [Toulouse] - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - ENVT - Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse - Toulouse INP - Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) - UT - Université de Toulouse)

  • Pauline Trillat
  • Marie Dervillé

    (LEREPS - Laboratoire d'Etude et de Recherche sur l'Economie, les Politiques et les Systèmes Sociaux - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse - UT2J - Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - UT - Université de Toulouse - Institut d'Études Politiques [IEP] - Toulouse - ENSFEA - École Nationale Supérieure de Formation de l'Enseignement Agricole de Toulouse-Auzeville)

  • Célia Cahuzac
  • Élise Maigné

    (US ODR - Observatoire des Programmes Communautaires de Développement Rural - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

  • Juan J. Loor

    (Department of Animal Sciences & Division of Nutritional Sciences - UIUC - University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign [Urbana] - University of Illinois System)

Abstract

There is extensive literature addressing acceptable practices of colostrum distribution to new-born calves; however, no economic analyses are available concerning the profitability of this practice. Moreover, the health standards associated with colostrum management have been defined through the observation of reference farms without explicit reference to economic assessments. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the profitability of farm colostrum management and to define the optimal economic situations for given livestock systems and farm situations. The herd-level net value was calculated using the value of calf products, the cost of passive transfer failure and the cost of prevention. This value was determined for various beef and dairy scenarios and the various time periods spent managing colostrum. The maximal net values defined the optimal economic situations and enabled the determination of the optimal times for colostrum management and respective health standards (i.e., the prevalence of disorders at optimum). The results showed that the optimal time farmers should spend on colostrum management is approximately 15 min per calf. Furthermore, farmers should err on the side of spending too much time (> 15 min) on colostrum management rather than not enough, unless the cost of labour is high. This is all the more true that potential long term consequences of passive transfer failure on milk yields were not accounted for here due to scarcity of data, leading to consider this time threshold (15 min) as a minimal recommendation. This potential underestimation may arise from the greater nutrient content and bioactive compounds identified in colostrum although the passive immune transfer is here defined through immunoglobulins only. The present results show that for small farms that cannot hire colostrum managers, this work can be performed by the farmer after subcontracting other tasks. Moreover, the method proposed here—the definition of health standards through economic optimisation—is a promising approach to analysing health conventions in the cattle industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Didier Raboisson & Pauline Trillat & Marie Dervillé & Célia Cahuzac & Élise Maigné & Juan J. Loor, 2018. "Defining health standards through economic optimisation: The example of colostrum management in beef and dairy production," Post-Print hal-01809647, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01809647
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196377
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://univ-tlse2.hal.science/hal-01809647
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://univ-tlse2.hal.science/hal-01809647/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0196377?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Didier Raboisson & Pauline Trillat & Clélia Cahuzac, 2016. "Failure of Passive Immune Transfer in Calves: A Meta-Analysis on the Consequences and Assessment of the Economic Impact," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Olivier Favereau & Emmanuel Lazega (ed.), 2002. "Conventions and Structures in Economic Organization," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2235.
    3. Lhermine, Guillaume & Raboisson, Didier & Krebs, Stéphane & Dupraz, Pierre, 2014. "Facteurs déterminants et leviers de réduction de l’usage des antibiotiques en productions animales," Working Papers 207804, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5180 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Didier Raboisson & Pauline Trillat & Marie Dervillé & Célia Cahuzac & Elise Maigné, 2018. "Defining health standards through economic optimisation: The example of colostrum management in beef and dairy production," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Abdelillah HAMDOUCH, 2008. "Conceptualizing innovation clusters and networks," Working Papers 3, Réseau de Recherche sur l’Innovation. / Research Network on Innovation.
    3. Hugues Jeannerat & Leila Kebir, 2012. "Mobility of Knowledge. Knowledge resources and markets: What territorial economic systems ?," GRET Publications and Working Papers 02-12, GRET Group of Research in Territorial Economy, University of Neuchâtel.
    4. Emmanuel Lazega & Lise Mounier & Paola Tubaro, 2011. "Norms, Advice Networks and Joint Economic Governance: The Case of Conflicts Among Shareholders at the Commercial Court of Paris," Chapters, in: Mehmet Ugur & David Sunderland (ed.), Does Economic Governance Matter?, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Kebir Leïla & Jeannerat Hugues, 2013. "Creativity, plasticity, quality: on the emergence of a new food offering in Paris," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 57(1-2), pages 27-38, October.
    6. Diane Rodet, 2015. "Solidarity economy and its qualities: a sector s' diversity analysed using "quality devices" [L'économie solidaire et ses qualités : diversité d'un secteur analysé au regard de ses dispos," Working Papers halshs-02329772, HAL.
    7. Lee Pugalis & Anna Round & Tony Blackwood & Lucy Hatt, 2015. "The entrepreneurial middle ground: Higher education entry decisions of aspiring entrepreneurs," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 30(5), pages 503-519, August.
    8. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/7o52iohb7k6srk09n211pgu0m is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Yuna Chiffoleau & Sarah Millet-Amrani & Arielle Canard, 2016. "From Short Food Supply Chains to Sustainable Agriculture in Urban Food Systems: Food Democracy as a Vector of Transition," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Slim, Sadri, 2009. "Du refus de vente au don: une explication de la formation du prix par l´affect [From rejection of exchange to gift: regard as an explanation of prices]," MPRA Paper 15317, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 24 Apr 2009.
    11. Danièle Benezech, 2011. "La confiance entre les partenaires de l'échange, au-delà des labels," Post-Print halshs-00592488, HAL.
    12. Johan Jansson & Anders Waxell, 2011. "Quality and Regional Competitiveness," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(9), pages 2237-2252, September.
    13. Dominik Fischer, 2019. "Relational Leadership And Regional Development: A Case Study On New Agriculture Ventures In Uganda," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(02), pages 1-33, June.
    14. Bessy, Christian & Diaz-Bone, Rainer, 2013. "Economics of convention as the socio-economic analysis of law: Christian Bessy interviewed by Rainer Diaz-Bone," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 14(2), pages 54-60.
    15. Ferruccio Trabalzi, 2007. "Crossing Conventions in Localized Food Networks: Insights from Southern Italy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(2), pages 283-300, February.
    16. Anders Waxell & Johan Jansson, 2013. "Sound Affects: Competing with Quality in the Swedish hi-fi Industry," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 316-335, May.
    17. Beckert, Jens, 2011. "Imagined futures. Fictionality in economic action," MPIfG Discussion Paper 11/8, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    18. Christoph Bühler & Dimiter Philipov, 2005. "Social Capital Related to Fertility: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Evidence from Bulgaria," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 3(1), pages 53-81.
    19. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/7o52iohb7k6srk09nad8ob40p is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Christoph Bühler, 2008. "On the structural value of children and its implication on intended fertility in Bulgaria," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 18(20), pages 569-610.
    21. Danièle Benezech, 2005. "Les ressorts de l'échange des produits alimentaires différenciés : Des conventions aux communautés ?," Post-Print halshs-00347709, HAL.
    22. Caroline Lanciano-Morandat & Eric Verdier, 2010. "Multi-level Perspectives: A Comparative Analysis of National R&D Policies," Chapters, in: Riccardo Viale & Henry Etzkowitz (ed.), The Capitalization of Knowledge, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01809647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.