IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01577644.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Government that Worked Better and Cost Less?: Evaluating Three Decades of Reform and Change in UK Central Government

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Hood

    (University of Bristol [Bristol])

  • Ruth Dixon
  • Derek Hawes

Abstract

Christopher HOOD & Ruth DIXON, A Government that worked better & cost less? – Evaluating three decades of Reform and Change in UK Central Government (Oxford University Press, 2015) pp: 229, £30.00, ISBN 978-0-19-968702 (hbk) Those who have long toiled at the coalface of public administration and remember the development of ‘new managerialism' in the 1980s and the promises of New Public Management (NPM) will welcome this volume which sets out to review the last thirty years and to ask searching questions about just how effective these techniques have been in reforming public expenditure, increasing efficiency and generally making the world a better place.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Hood & Ruth Dixon & Derek Hawes, 2015. "A Government that Worked Better and Cost Less?: Evaluating Three Decades of Reform and Change in UK Central Government," Post-Print hal-01577644, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01577644
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01577644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01577644/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mette Sønderskov & Rolf Rønning, 2021. "Public Service Logic: An Appropriate Recipe for Improving Serviceness in the Public Sector?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, June.
    2. John Alford & Carsten Greve, 2017. "Strategy in the Public and Private Sectors: Similarities, Differences and Changes," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Mario Coccia & Igor Benati, 2017. "What is the relation between public manager compensation and government effectiveness? An explorative analysis with public management implications," quaderni IRCrES 201701, CNR-IRCrES Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY - former Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Torino (TO) ITALY.
    4. Soldatkin A. A. & Krakhmalov A. N. & Rakevich I. V. & Prudnikova N. N., 2018. "Labor Potential of the Municipal Civil Service of Saratov Region," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 1094-1100:5.
    5. Linda Aimée Hartford Kvæl & Jonas Debesay & Asta Bye & Anne Langaas & Astrid Bergland, 2019. "Choice, Voice, and Coproduction in Intermediate Care: Exploring Geriatric Patients’ and Their Relatives’ Perspectives on Patient Participation," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, September.
    6. Hendrik Wagenaar & Matthew Wood, 2018. "The Precarious Politics of Public Innovation," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 150-160.
    7. Carolyn‐Dung Thi Thanh Tran & Brian Dollery, 2021. "All in the Mind: Citizen Satisfaction and Financial Performance in the Victorian Local Government System," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(1), pages 51-64, March.
    8. Mads Peter Klindt, 2017. "Trade union renewal through local partnerships for skill formation," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 23(4), pages 441-455, November.
    9. Montás, Marie C. & Klasa, Katarzyna & van Ginneken, Ewout & Greer, Scott L., 2022. "Strategic purchasing and health systems resilience: Lessons from COVID-19 in selected European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(9), pages 853-864.
    10. Christensen, Mark & Newberry, Susan & Potter, Bradley N., 2019. "Enabling global accounting change: Epistemic communities and the creation of a ‘more business-like’ public sector," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 53-76.
    11. repec:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:226-232 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Jens Sörensen & Erik J. Olsson, 2020. "Shadow Management: Neoliberalism and the Erosion of Democratic Legitimacy through Ombudsmen with Case Studies from Swedish Higher Education," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, March.
    13. Maria Paula Escobar & David Demeritt, 2017. "Paperwork and the decoupling of audit and animal welfare: The challenges of materiality for better regulation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(1), pages 169-190, February.
    14. Elizabeth Dávid-Barrett & Vladimir Gligorov & Jelena Krstić, 2016. "Corruption Risk and Legitimacy in Outsourced Public Service Provision: Evidence from Serbia," wiiw Balkan Observatory Working Papers 120, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    15. Leon Wansleben, 2021. "Divisions of regulatory labor, institutional closure, and structural secrecy in new regulatory states: The case of neglected liquidity risks in market‐based banking," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 909-932, July.
    16. Cooper, Christine & Lapsley, Irvine, 2021. "Hillsborough: The fight for accountability," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    dissemin;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01577644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.