IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wii/bpaper/120.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Corruption Risk and Legitimacy in Outsourced Public Service Provision: Evidence from Serbia

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth Dávid-Barrett
  • Vladimir Gligorov

    (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw)

  • Jelena Krstić

Abstract

The provision of public services is an important way for weak states to build legitimacy, as long as the public regards the allocation of resources as impartial and fair. However, in societies where resources have long been distributed according to particularist and informal ties, it may be difficult to ensure an impartial allocation. We argue that the challenge of using service provision to build state legitimacy is complicated by the wider trend towards increasing private provision of public services. This makes it harder to hold the state to account for service provision, especially in transition and developing-country contexts where the distinction between the public and private spheres is in any case blurred. To explore these issues in the context of Serbia, the paper focuses on the public procurement process. We discuss process and outcome indicators of corruption risk in Serbian public procurement, assess the institutional control framework, and consider four recent cases of irregularities that are indicative of corruption risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth Dávid-Barrett & Vladimir Gligorov & Jelena Krstić, 2016. "Corruption Risk and Legitimacy in Outsourced Public Service Provision: Evidence from Serbia," wiiw Balkan Observatory Working Papers 120, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    • Handle: RePEc:wii:bpaper:120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://wiiw.ac.at/corruption-risk-and-legitimacy-in-outsourced-public-service-provision-evidence-from-serbia-dlp-3903.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mungiu-Pippidi,Alina, 2015. "The Quest for Good Governance," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107534575.
    2. Heather Marquette & Danielle Beswick, 2011. "State Building, Security and Development: state building as a new development paradigm?," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(10), pages 1703-1714.
    3. Mungiu-Pippidi,Alina, 2015. "The Quest for Good Governance," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107113923.
    4. repec:bla:devpol:v:28:y:2010:i:2:p:131-154 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Christopher Hood & Ruth Dixon & Derek Hawes, 2015. "A Government that Worked Better and Cost Less?: Evaluating Three Decades of Reform and Change in UK Central Government," Post-Print hal-01577644, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dávid-Barrett, Elizabeth & Fazekas, Mihály, 2020. "Anti-corruption in aid-funded procurement: Is corruption reduced or merely displaced?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zafar Nazarov & Anastassia Obydenkova, 2022. "Public Health, Democracy, and Transition: Global Evidence and Post-Communism," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 160(1), pages 261-285, February.
    2. Sarkar, Abhirup & Sinha, Abhinandan, 2022. "Clientelism and violence: The politics of informal economy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    3. Masuch, Klaus & Anderton, Robert & Setzer, Ralph & Benalal, Nicholai, 2018. "Structural policies in the euro area," Occasional Paper Series 210, European Central Bank.
    4. Laarni Escresa & Lucio Picci, 2020. "The determinants of cross-border corruption," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 184(3), pages 351-378, September.
    5. Eliška Drápalová & Fabrizio Di Mascio, 2020. "Islands of Good Government: Explaining Successful Corruption Control in Two Spanish Cities," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 128-139.
    6. Muyiwa Samuel Adedayo, 2021. "Good Governance, Bad Governance: The Politics of Coronavirus Pandemic in Nigeria," RAIS Conference Proceedings 2021 0028, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    7. Abdul Rahim, 2019. "Governance and Good Governance-A Conceptual Perspective," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(3), pages 133-142, December.
    8. Daniel N Mlambo & Mandla A Mubecua & Siphesihle Edmund Mpanza & Victor H Mlambo, 2019. "Corruption and Its Implications for Development and Good Governance: A Perspective from Post-Colonial Africa," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 11(1), pages 39-47.
    9. Kristyna Chabova, 2017. "Measuring corruption in Europe: public opinion surveys and composite indices," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1877-1900, July.
    10. Andries Francois Geldenhuys & Oluseye Samuel Ajuwon & Michael Graham, 2020. "Resource Curse And The Eiti Membership Effect On The Economic Growth And Corruption In Sub-Saharan Africa: Part I - A Theoretical Review," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 18-28, March.
    11. Ocheje Paul D., 2017. "Creating an anti-corruption norm in Africa: Critical reflections on legal instrumentalization for development," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2), pages 477-496, October.
    12. Samuel Adedayo MUYIWA, 2021. "Influence of Politics of Governance on Management of Coronavirus in Nigeria," RAIS Journal for Social Sciences, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. 5(1), pages 29-38, May.
    13. Johannes Wachs & Mih'aly Fazekas & J'anos Kert'esz, 2019. "Corruption Risk in Contracting Markets: A Network Science Perspective," Papers 1909.08664, arXiv.org.
    14. Gallego, Jorge & Rivero, Gonzalo & Martínez, Juan, 2021. "Preventing rather than punishing: An early warning model of malfeasance in public procurement," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 360-377.
    15. Sheilendra Peerthum & Takesh Luckho, 2021. "Exploring the Linkage Between Public Corruption and Political Trust in Mauritius: a PLS-SEM Approach," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 317-335, June.
    16. Gans-Morse, Jordan & Borges, Mariana & Makarin, Alexey & Mannah-Blankson, Theresa & Nickow, Andre & Zhang, Dong, 2018. "Reducing bureaucratic corruption: Interdisciplinary perspectives on what works," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 171-188.
    17. Efendic, Adnan & Ledeneva, Alena, 2020. "The importance of being networked: The costs of informal networking in the Western Balkans region," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(4).
    18. Mihály Fazekas & Johannes Wachs, 2020. "Corruption and the Network Structure of Public Contracting Markets across Government Change," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 153-166.
    19. Fazekas, Mihály & Tóth, Bence, 2018. "The extent and cost of corruption in transport infrastructure. New evidence from Europe," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 35-54.
    20. Berenschot, Ward & Mulder, Peter, 2019. "Explaining regional variation in local governance: Clientelism and state-dependency in Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 233-244.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wii:bpaper:120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Customer service (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wiiwwat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.