IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2018p1094-1100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Labor Potential of the Municipal Civil Service of Saratov Region

Author

Listed:
  • Soldatkin A. A.

    (Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), the Russian Federation, Russia)

  • Krakhmalov A. N.

    (Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), Graduate school of Public Administration, the Russian Federation, Russia)

  • Rakevich I. V.

    (Chief of staff of the Association “Municipalities Council of Saratov Region†, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Docent, the Russian Federation, Russia)

  • Prudnikova N. N.

    (Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Docent, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), Graduate school of Public Administration, the Russian Federation, Russia)

Abstract

The scope of the research is the assessment of labor potential of the municipal civil service of Saratov region. This researchs methodology combines three methods for different purposes: cost method, quantitative method and the qualitative research.The results showed that the application of the program-target approach provides foundations of formation of the state and municipal initiatives for the education of the municipal civil servants and enhances the comprehensive development of the labor potential of municipal civil service. The approach will stimulate systematic and on-going evolution of labor potential of municipal civil service based on assessing its current state and level of development. The authors conclude that the lack of state and municipal initiatives for vocational training of municipal civil servants (especially retraining and further education programs for them), does not allow for the comprehensive education of municipal civil servants, which may lead to decrease their effectiveness in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Soldatkin A. A. & Krakhmalov A. N. & Rakevich I. V. & Prudnikova N. N., 2018. "Labor Potential of the Municipal Civil Service of Saratov Region," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 1094-1100:5.
    • Handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:1094-1100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/spi5.1-1094-1100.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/7/special_issue/12-2018/5/4
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher Hood & Ruth Dixon & Derek Hawes, 2015. "A Government that Worked Better and Cost Less?: Evaluating Three Decades of Reform and Change in UK Central Government," Post-Print hal-01577644, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carolyn‐Dung Thi Thanh Tran & Brian Dollery, 2021. "All in the Mind: Citizen Satisfaction and Financial Performance in the Victorian Local Government System," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(1), pages 51-64, March.
    2. Montás, Marie C. & Klasa, Katarzyna & van Ginneken, Ewout & Greer, Scott L., 2022. "Strategic purchasing and health systems resilience: Lessons from COVID-19 in selected European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(9), pages 853-864.
    3. Jens Sörensen & Erik J. Olsson, 2020. "Shadow Management: Neoliberalism and the Erosion of Democratic Legitimacy through Ombudsmen with Case Studies from Swedish Higher Education," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Leon Wansleben, 2021. "Divisions of regulatory labor, institutional closure, and structural secrecy in new regulatory states: The case of neglected liquidity risks in market‐based banking," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 909-932, July.
    5. Cooper, Christine & Lapsley, Irvine, 2021. "Hillsborough: The fight for accountability," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    6. John Alford & Carsten Greve, 2017. "Strategy in the Public and Private Sectors: Similarities, Differences and Changes," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Mario Coccia & Igor Benati, 2017. "What is the relation between public manager compensation and government effectiveness? An explorative analysis with public management implications," quaderni IRCrES 201701, CNR-IRCrES Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY - former Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Torino (TO) ITALY.
    8. Maria Paula Escobar & David Demeritt, 2017. "Paperwork and the decoupling of audit and animal welfare: The challenges of materiality for better regulation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(1), pages 169-190, February.
    9. Mette Sønderskov & Rolf Rønning, 2021. "Public Service Logic: An Appropriate Recipe for Improving Serviceness in the Public Sector?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, June.
    10. Linda Aimée Hartford Kvæl & Jonas Debesay & Asta Bye & Anne Langaas & Astrid Bergland, 2019. "Choice, Voice, and Coproduction in Intermediate Care: Exploring Geriatric Patients’ and Their Relatives’ Perspectives on Patient Participation," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, September.
    11. repec:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:226-232 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Mads Peter Klindt, 2017. "Trade union renewal through local partnerships for skill formation," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 23(4), pages 441-455, November.
    13. Hendrik Wagenaar & Matthew Wood, 2018. "The Precarious Politics of Public Innovation," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 150-160.
    14. Christensen, Mark & Newberry, Susan & Potter, Bradley N., 2019. "Enabling global accounting change: Epistemic communities and the creation of a ‘more business-like’ public sector," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 53-76.
    15. Elizabeth Dávid-Barrett & Vladimir Gligorov & Jelena Krstić, 2016. "Corruption Risk and Legitimacy in Outsourced Public Service Provision: Evidence from Serbia," wiiw Balkan Observatory Working Papers 120, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:1094-1100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.