IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00765468.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Le don gratuit. Le cas d'un établissement public

Author

Listed:
  • Yvan Barel

    (LEMNA - Laboratoire d'économie et de management de Nantes Atlantique - IEMN-IAE Nantes - Institut d'Économie et de Management de Nantes - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - UN - Université de Nantes)

  • Sandrine Frémeaux

    (Audencia Recherche - Audencia Business School)

Abstract

La logique de la réciprocité est le cadre d'analyse dominant de la relation de travail. La logique du don/contredon s'inscrit dans ce même cadre de référence, en postulant qu'aucune relation d'échange ne peut survivre à une situation d'asymétrie trop forte (MAUSS, 1924). Mais elle ajoute une idée nouvelle en mettant en exergue le " tabou du calcul " (BOURDIEU, 1980) : le désir de contredon n'est pas toujours manifesté, ni même conscient. Aux côtés de la logique de réciprocité, un autre concept fait son apparition : celui de don existentiel ou don gratuit, qui se suffit à lui-même et dont les travaux de CAILLÉ et GODBOUT (1992), puis de DUMOND (2007) ont révélé l'importance. Déconnecté d'une quelconque attente de retour, le don existentiel est-il ce qui donne sens au travail ? Des expériences de don ont été exprimées par des salariés d'un CROUS (Centre Régional des OEuvres Universitaires et Scolaires), organisme public français ayant pour vocation de faciliter la vie des étudiants dans de nombreux domaines (restauration, logement, bourses, action sociale et culturelle, ouverture sur l'international). L'étude a été menée à l'occasion de la construction d'un projet d'établissement. Si, lors des entretiens semi-directifs réalisés auprès d'un échantillon transversal de trente-sept salariés, certains récits témoignent d'un attachement à la logique de réciprocité marchande, d'autres récits, au contraire, sont des témoignages de don aux étudiants. Cette analyse montre l'importance, pour un grand nombre de salariés, du rapport personnel, libre, non stratégique aux usagers, dans les entreprises de service public.

Suggested Citation

  • Yvan Barel & Sandrine Frémeaux, 2008. "Le don gratuit. Le cas d'un établissement public," Post-Print hal-00765468, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00765468
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00765468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-00765468/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sherry, John F, Jr, 1983. "Gift Giving in Anthropological Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 10(2), pages 157-168, September.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4859 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:oup:jecgeo:v:50:y:2023:i:2:p:282-302. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Russell Belk, 2007. "Why Not Share Rather Than Own?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 611(1), pages 126-140, May.
    3. Sun, Francis, 2016. "How to manage client entertainment in China," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(4), pages 401-410.
    4. Francesca De Canio & Davide Pellegrini & Elisa Martinelli, 2018. "Is the collaborative consumption the new buying? Social and economic aspects influencing collaborative consumption," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 19-38.
    5. Cheng, Andong & Meloy, Margaret G. & Polman, Evan, 2021. "Picking Gifts for Picky People," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 191-206.
    6. Béatrice Parguel & Florence Benoît-Moreau & Fabrice Larceneux, 2011. "How Sustainability Ratings Might Deter ‘Greenwashing’: A Closer Look at Ethical Corporate Communication," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 15-28, August.
    7. Godbout, Jacques T., 1998. "The moral of the gift," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 557-570.
    8. Sandrine Frémeaux & Grant Michelson, 2011. ""No Strings Attached": Welcoming the Existential Gift in Business," Post-Print hal-00797037, HAL.
    9. Cruz-Cárdenas, Jorge & del Val Núñez, M. Teresa, 2016. "Clothing disposition by gifting: Benefits for consumers and new consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 4975-4979.
    10. Marta Pizzetti & Diletta Acuti & Isabella Soscia & Michael Gibbert, 2024. "You designed that yourself for me? Vicarious pride in customized gift exchange," Post-Print hal-04637410, HAL.
    11. Troebs, Cord-Christian & Wagner, Tillmann & Heidemann, F., 2018. "Transformative retail services: Elevating loyalty through customer well-being," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 198-206.
    12. Erevelles, Sunil, 1998. "The Role of Affect in Marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 199-215, July.
    13. Guglielmo Faldetta, 2011. "The Logic of Gift and Gratuitousness in Business Relationships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 100(1), pages 67-77, March.
    14. Bradford, Tonya Williams & Sherry, John F., 2013. "Orchestrating rituals through retailers: An examination of gift registry," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 158-175.
    15. Wang, Zhixiao & Kong, Dongmin & Liu, Shasha, 2024. "Corporate social responsibility and firm-level systematic risk: The moderating effect of economic policy uncertainty," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    16. Mike Molesworth & Rebecca Watkins & Janice Denegri-Knott, 2016. "Possession Work on Hosted Digital Consumption Objects as Consumer Ensnarement," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(2), pages 246-261.
    17. Boafo, Yaw Agyeman & Saito, Osamu & Jasaw, Godfred Seidu & Otsuki, Kei & Takeuchi, Kazuhiko, 2016. "Provisioning ecosystem services-sharing as a coping and adaptation strategy among rural communities in Ghana's semi-arid ecosystem," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 92-102.
    18. Martin Mathews, 2017. "Gift giving, reciprocity and the creation of trust," Journal of Trust Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 90-106, January.
    19. Ariane Berthoin Antal & Gervaise Debucquet & Sandrine Frémeaux, 2018. "Meaningful work and artistic interventions in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical exploration," Post-Print hal-03232781, HAL.
    20. Hutter, Michael, 2021. "Three Modes of Valuation Practices in Art Games," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 85-119.
    21. Aurélie Kessous & Pierre Valette-Florence & Virginie de Barnier, 2016. "Luxury watch possession and dispossession from father to son: A poisoned gift? Pierre Valette-Florence, Professor, IAE de Grenoble," Post-Print hal-01472038, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00765468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.