IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/dpaper/24084.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Macroeconomic Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Productivity: An estimate from a survey

Author

Listed:
  • MORIKAWA Masayuki

Abstract

Based on a survey of Japanese workers, this study documents the characteristics of workers who use artificial intelligence (AI) in their jobs and estimates the effects of this new general-purpose technology on macroeconomic productivity. The results indicate, first, 8.3% of workers used AI in their jobs in 2024, which is approximately 1.5 times than in 2023. Second, more educated and high-wage workers tend to use AI, suggesting that its diffusion may increase labor market inequality. Third, the use of AI is estimated to have increased labor productivity in the macroeconomy by 0.5–0.6%. Fourth, nearly 30% of workers expect to use AI for their jobs in the future, suggesting that its macroeconomic effects will increase. However, the productivity effect of AI for those who recently started using it is relatively small, suggesting a diminishing productivity impact of AI.

Suggested Citation

  • MORIKAWA Masayuki, 2024. "Macroeconomic Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Productivity: An estimate from a survey," Discussion papers 24084, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    • Handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:24084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/24e084.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daisuke Adachi & Daiji Kawaguchi & Yukiko U. Saito, 2024. "Robots and Employment: Evidence from Japan, 1978–2017," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 42(2), pages 591-634.
    2. Erik Brynjolfsson & Danielle Li & Lindsey Raymond, 2023. "Generative AI at Work," Papers 2304.11771, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
    3. Alexander Bick & Adam Blandin & David Deming, 2023. "The Rapid Adoption of Generative AI," On the Economy 98843, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James Bono & Alec Xu, 2024. "Randomized Controlled Trials for Security Copilot for IT Administrators," Papers 2411.01067, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
    2. Raphael Auer & David Köpfer & Josef Švéda & Raphael A. Auer, 2024. "The Rise of Generative AI: Modelling Exposure, Substitution, and Inequality Effects on the US Labour Market," CESifo Working Paper Series 11410, CESifo.
    3. MORIKAWA Masayuki, 2024. "Use of Artificial Intelligence and Productivity: Evidence from firm and worker surveys," Discussion papers 24074, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    4. Carvajal, Daniel & Franco, Catalina & Isaksson, Siri, 2024. "Will Artificial Intelligence Get in the Way of Achieving Gender Equality?," Discussion Paper Series in Economics 3/2024, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics, revised 31 Oct 2024.
    5. Venturini, Francesco, 2022. "Intelligent technologies and productivity spillovers: Evidence from the Fourth Industrial Revolution," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 220-243.
    6. Gaétan de Rassenfosse & Adam B. Jaffe & Joel Waldfogel, 2024. "Intellectual Property and Creative Machines," NBER Chapters, in: Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, volume 4, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Alexander Cuntz & Carsten Fink & Hansueli Stamm, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property : An Economic Perspective," WIPO Economic Research Working Papers 77, World Intellectual Property Organization - Economics and Statistics Division.
    8. Lilia Patrignani, 2024. "Understanding digital trade," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 841, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    9. Miyoshi, Koyo, 2024. "The decline in the labor share: Evidence from Japanese manufacturers’ panel data," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    10. Mauro Caselli & Edwin Fourrier-Nicolai & Andrea Fracasso & Sergio Scicchitano, 2024. "Digital Technologies and Firms’ Employment and Training," CESifo Working Paper Series 11056, CESifo.
    11. Amali Matharaarachchi & Wishmitha Mendis & Kanishka Randunu & Daswin De Silva & Gihan Gamage & Harsha Moraliyage & Nishan Mills & Andrew Jennings, 2024. "Optimizing Generative AI Chatbots for Net-Zero Emissions Energy Internet-of-Things Infrastructure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-19, April.
    12. Bohren, Noah & Hakimov, Rustamdjan & Lalive, Rafael, 2024. "Creative and Strategic Capabilities of Generative AI: Evidence from Large-Scale Experiments," IZA Discussion Papers 17302, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Leonardo Gambacorta & Han Qiu & Shuo Shan & Daniel M Rees, 2024. "Generative AI and labour productivity: a field experiment on coding," BIS Working Papers 1208, Bank for International Settlements.
    14. Becker, Dominik & Deck, Luca & Feulner, Simon & Gutheil, Niklas & Schüll, Moritz & Decker, Stefan & Eymann, Torsten & Gimpel, Henner & Pippow, Andreas & Röglinger, Maximilian & Urbach, Nils, 2024. "Lohnt sich Microsoft 365 Copilot? Eine Potenzialanalyse für Unternehmen und Bildungseinrichtungen," Bayreuth Reports on Information Systems Management 72, University of Bayreuth, Chair of Information Systems Management.
    15. Pouliakas, Konstantinos & Santangelo, Giulia, 2025. "Are Artificial Intelligence (AI) Skills a Reward or a Gamble? Deconstructing the AI Wage Premium in Europe," IZA Discussion Papers 17607, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Christian Peukert & Florian Abeillon & Jérémie Haese & Franziska Kaiser & Alexander Staub, 2024. "Strategic Behavior and AI Training Data," CESifo Working Paper Series 11099, CESifo.
    17. Piotr Lewandowski & Wojciech Szymczak, 2024. "Automation, Trade Unions and Involuntary Atypical Employment," IBS Working Papers 02/2024, Instytut Badan Strukturalnych.
    18. Stankov, Petar, 2024. "The death of exams? Grade inflation and student satisfaction when coursework replaces exams," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    19. Iñaki Aldasoro & Leonardo Gambacorta & Anton Korinek & Vatsala Shreeti & Merlin Stein, 2024. "Intelligent financial system: how AI is transforming finance," BIS Working Papers 1194, Bank for International Settlements.
    20. Henry A. Thompson, 2024. "AI and the law," Papers 2412.05090, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:24084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.