IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ems/eureri/115831.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A good or a bad timetable: Do different evaluation functions agree?

Author

Listed:
  • Hartleb, J.
  • Schmidt, M.E.
  • Friedrich, M.
  • Huisman, D.

Abstract

We compare different evaluation functions that are all designed to mea- sure the quality of a timetable from passengers’ perspective. Already in small examples fundamentally different timetables can be preferred by evaluation functions that seem to be similar. To investigate this effect in practice, we design a set of evaluation functions as representatives for a wide range of commonly used evaluation functions in optimization models, evaluation applications, or choice models. These functions are compared by analyzing their evaluation values of multiple timetables in three case studies. To investigate to what extent these evaluation functions agree on a good or a bad timetable, we apply cluster analysis as well as a novel methodology to quantify the similarity of pairs of evaluation functions based on the values they yield on different timetables. We empirically show that the choice of the evaluation function can have a significant impact on the assessed quality of timetables, and thus also on which timetable is considered optimal, even though all evaluation functions are meant to evaluate the same - the quality of a timetable from passengers’ perspective. Due to the structure of the designed evaluation functions, it is further possible to identify which components of the func- tions influence the results of an evaluation and under which conditions they this is most pronounced. This can be very beneficial when designing timetable evaluation functions for passengers.

Suggested Citation

  • Hartleb, J. & Schmidt, M.E. & Friedrich, M. & Huisman, D., 2019. "A good or a bad timetable: Do different evaluation functions agree?," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2019-002-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    • Handle: RePEc:ems:eureri:115831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/115831/ERS-2019-002-LIS.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. dell'Olio, Luigi & Ibeas, Angel & Cecín, Patricia, 2010. "Modelling user perception of bus transit quality," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 388-397, November.
    2. de Jong, Gerard & Daly, Andrew & Pieters, Marits & van der Hoorn, Toon, 2007. "The logsum as an evaluation measure: Review of the literature and new results," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(9), pages 874-889, November.
    3. Ralf Borndörfer & Heide Hoppmann & Marika Karbstein, 2017. "Passenger routing for periodic timetable optimization," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 115-135, July.
    4. Wardman, Mark, 2004. "Public transport values of time," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 363-377, October.
    5. Jens Parbo & Otto Anker Nielsen & Carlo Giacomo Prato, 2016. "Passenger Perspectives in Railway Timetabling: A Literature Review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 500-526, July.
    6. Robenek, Tomáš & Maknoon, Yousef & Azadeh, Shadi Sharif & Chen, Jianghang & Bierlaire, Michel, 2016. "Passenger centric train timetabling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 107-126.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Julius Pätzold, 2021. "Finding robust periodic timetables by integrating delay management," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 349-374, June.
    2. Polinder, G.-J. & Cacchiani, V. & Schmidt, M.E. & Huisman, D., 2020. "An iterative heuristic for passenger-centric train timetabling with integrated adaption times," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2020-006-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    3. Hartleb, J. & Schmidt, M.E., 2019. "Railway timetabling with integrated passenger distribution," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2019-012-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    4. Hartleb, Johann & Schmidt, Marie, 2022. "Railway timetabling with integrated passenger distribution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(3), pages 953-966.
    5. Polinder, Gert-Jaap & Schmidt, Marie & Huisman, Dennis, 2021. "Timetabling for strategic passenger railway planning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 111-135.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hartleb, Johann & Schmidt, Marie, 2022. "Railway timetabling with integrated passenger distribution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(3), pages 953-966.
    2. Xie, J. & Wong, S.C. & Zhan, S. & Lo, S.M. & Chen, Anthony, 2020. "Train schedule optimization based on schedule-based stochastic passenger assignment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    3. Hartleb, J. & Schmidt, M.E., 2019. "Railway timetabling with integrated passenger distribution," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2019-012-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    4. Robenek, Tomáš & Azadeh, Shadi Sharif & Maknoon, Yousef & de Lapparent, Matthieu & Bierlaire, Michel, 2018. "Train timetable design under elastic passenger demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 19-38.
    5. Polinder, G.-J. & Schmidt, M.E. & Huisman, D., 2020. "Timetabling for strategic passenger railway planning," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2020-001-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    6. Binder, Stefan & Maknoon, Yousef & Bierlaire, Michel, 2017. "Exogenous priority rules for the capacitated passenger assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 19-42.
    7. Junya Kumagai & Mihoko Wakamatsu & Shunsuke Managi, 2021. "Do commuters adapt to in-vehicle crowding on trains?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2357-2399, October.
    8. Mahmood Mahmoodi Nesheli & Avishai (Avi) Ceder & Robin Brissaud, 2017. "Public transport service-quality elements based on real-time operational tactics," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 957-975, September.
    9. Yan, Fei & Goverde, Rob M.P., 2019. "Combined line planning and train timetabling for strongly heterogeneous railway lines with direct connections," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 20-46.
    10. Masiero, Lorenzo & Hrankai, Richard, 2022. "Modeling tourist accessibility to peripheral attractions," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    11. Chakrabarti, Sandip & Giuliano, Genevieve, 2015. "Does service reliability determine transit patronage? Insights from the Los Angeles Metro bus system," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 12-20.
    12. Wenliang Zhou & Wenzhuang Fan & Xiaorong You & Lianbo Deng, 2019. "Demand-Oriented Train Timetabling Integrated with Passenger Train-Booking Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-34, September.
    13. Polinder, Gert-Jaap & Schmidt, Marie & Huisman, Dennis, 2021. "Timetabling for strategic passenger railway planning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 111-135.
    14. Zhan, Shuguang & Wong, S.C. & Lo, S.M., 2020. "Social equity-based timetabling and ticket pricing for high-speed railways," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 165-186.
    15. Ahmed, Tanjeeb & Hyland, Michael & Sarma, Navjyoth J.S. & Mitra, Suman & Ghaffar, Arash, 2020. "Quantifying the employment accessibility benefits of shared automated vehicle mobility services: Consumer welfare approach using logsums," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 221-247.
    16. Robenek, Tomáš & Maknoon, Yousef & Azadeh, Shadi Sharif & Chen, Jianghang & Bierlaire, Michel, 2016. "Passenger centric train timetabling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 107-126.
    17. Chow, Andy H.F. & Pavlides, Aris, 2018. "Cost functions and multi-objective timetabling of mixed train services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 335-356.
    18. Bellizzi, Maria Grazia & dell'Olio, Luigi & Eboli, Laura & Mazzulla, Gabriella, 2020. "Heterogeneity in desired bus service quality from users’ and potential users’ perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 365-377.
    19. Meng, Lingyun & Zhou, Xuesong, 2019. "An integrated train service plan optimization model with variable demand: A team-based scheduling approach with dual cost information in a layered network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 1-28.
    20. Marina Lagune-Reutler & Andrew Guthrie & Yingling Fan & David Levinson, 2015. "Transit Riders' Perception of Waiting Time and Stops' Surrounding Environments," Working Papers 000142, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ems:eureri:115831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RePub (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erimanl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.