IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v136y2020ics1366554518311086.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Train schedule optimization based on schedule-based stochastic passenger assignment

Author

Listed:
  • Xie, J.
  • Wong, S.C.
  • Zhan, S.
  • Lo, S.M.
  • Chen, Anthony

Abstract

In this study, we propose a new schedule-based itinerary-choice model, the mixed itinerary-size weibit model, to address the independently and identically distributed assumptions that are typically used in random utility models and heterogeneity of passengers’ perceptions. Specifically, the Weibull distributed random error term resolves the perception variance with respect to various itinerary lengths, an itinerary-size factor term is suggested to solve the itinerary overlapping problem, and random coefficients are used to model heterogeneity of passengers. We also apply the mixed itinerary-size weibit model to a train-scheduling model to generate a passenger-oriented schedule plan. We test the efficiency and applicability of the train-scheduling model in the south China high-speed railway network, and we find that it works well and can be applied to large real-world problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Xie, J. & Wong, S.C. & Zhan, S. & Lo, S.M. & Chen, Anthony, 2020. "Train schedule optimization based on schedule-based stochastic passenger assignment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:136:y:2020:i:c:s1366554518311086
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2020.101882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554518311086
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2020.101882?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gabrio Caimi & Dan Burkolter & Thomas Herrmann & Fabian Chudak & Marco Laumanns, 2009. "Design of a Railway Scheduling Model for Dense Services," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 25-46, March.
    2. Freund-Feinstein, Uzi & Bekhor, Shlomo, 2017. "An airline itinerary choice model that includes the option to delay the decision," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 64-78.
    3. Kitthamkesorn, Songyot & Chen, Anthony, 2013. "A path-size weibit stochastic user equilibrium model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 378-397.
    4. Leo G. Kroon & Leon W. P. Peeters, 2003. "A Variable Trip Time Model for Cyclic Railway Timetabling," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(2), pages 198-212, May.
    5. Chen, Anthony & Pravinvongvuth, Surachet & Xu, Xiangdong & Ryu, Seungkyu & Chootinan, Piya, 2012. "Examining the scaling effect and overlapping problem in logit-based stochastic user equilibrium models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1343-1358.
    6. Lurkin, Virginie & Garrow, Laurie A. & Higgins, Matthew J. & Newman, Jeffrey P. & Schyns, Michael, 2017. "Accounting for price endogeneity in airline itinerary choice models: An application to Continental U.S. markets," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 228-246.
    7. Bešinović, Nikola & Goverde, Rob M.P. & Quaglietta, Egidio & Roberti, Roberto, 2016. "An integrated micro–macro approach to robust railway timetabling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 14-32.
    8. Lusby, Richard M. & Larsen, Jesper & Bull, Simon, 2018. "A survey on robustness in railway planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 1-15.
    9. Talebian, Ahmadreza & Zou, Bo, 2015. "Integrated modeling of high performance passenger and freight train planning on shared-use corridors in the US," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 114-140.
    10. Ralf Borndörfer & Heide Hoppmann & Marika Karbstein, 2017. "Passenger routing for periodic timetable optimization," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 115-135, July.
    11. Niu, Huimin & Zhou, Xuesong & Gao, Ruhu, 2015. "Train scheduling for minimizing passenger waiting time with time-dependent demand and skip-stop patterns: Nonlinear integer programming models with linear constraints," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 117-135.
    12. Poon, M. H. & Wong, S. C. & Tong, C. O., 2004. "A dynamic schedule-based model for congested transit networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 343-368, May.
    13. Corman, Francesco & D’Ariano, Andrea & Marra, Alessio D. & Pacciarelli, Dario & Samà, Marcella, 2017. "Integrating train scheduling and delay management in real-time railway traffic control," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 213-239.
    14. Stephane Hess & John W. Polak, 2006. "Airport, airline and access mode choice in the San Francisco Bay area," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 85(4), pages 543-567, November.
    15. Robenek, Tomáš & Azadeh, Shadi Sharif & Maknoon, Yousef & de Lapparent, Matthieu & Bierlaire, Michel, 2018. "Train timetable design under elastic passenger demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 19-38.
    16. Cacchiani, Valentina & Toth, Paolo, 2012. "Nominal and robust train timetabling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 727-737.
    17. Drabas, Tomasz & Wu, Cheng-Lung, 2013. "Modelling air carrier choices with a Segment Specific Cross Nested Logit model," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 8-16.
    18. Sparing, Daniel & Goverde, Rob M.P., 2017. "A cycle time optimization model for generating stable periodic railway timetables," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 198-223.
    19. Kang, Liujiang & Meng, Qiang, 2017. "Two-phase decomposition method for the last train departure time choice in subway networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 568-582.
    20. Zhan, Shuguang & Kroon, Leo G. & Veelenturf, Lucas P. & Wagenaar, Joris C., 2015. "Real-time high-speed train rescheduling in case of a complete blockage," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 182-201.
    21. Castillo, Enrique & Menéndez, José María & Jiménez, Pilar & Rivas, Ana, 2008. "Closed form expressions for choice probabilities in the Weibull case," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 373-380, May.
    22. Frejinger, E. & Bierlaire, M., 2007. "Capturing correlation with subnetworks in route choice models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 363-378, March.
    23. Kang, Liujiang & Zhu, Xiaoning & Sun, Huijun & Wu, Jianjun & Gao, Ziyou & Hu, Bin, 2019. "Last train timetabling optimization and bus bridging service management in urban railway transit networks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 31-44.
    24. Sels, P. & Dewilde, T. & Cattrysse, D. & Vansteenwegen, P., 2016. "Reducing the passenger travel time in practice by the automated construction of a robust railway timetable," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 124-156.
    25. Seelhorst, Michael & Liu, Yi, 2015. "Latent air travel preferences: Understanding the role of frequent flyer programs on itinerary choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 49-61.
    26. Heydecker, B. G., 1996. "A decomposition approach for signal optimisation in road networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 99-114, April.
    27. Zhou, Wenliang & Teng, Hualiang, 2016. "Simultaneous passenger train routing and timetabling using an efficient train-based Lagrangian relaxation decomposition," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 409-439.
    28. Kitthamkesorn, Songyot & Chen, Anthony, 2014. "Unconstrained weibit stochastic user equilibrium model with extensions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1-21.
    29. Kang, Liujiang & Wu, Jianjun & Sun, Huijun & Zhu, Xiaoning & Wang, Bo, 2015. "A practical model for last train rescheduling with train delay in urban railway transit networks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 29-42.
    30. Jens Parbo & Otto Anker Nielsen & Carlo Giacomo Prato, 2016. "Passenger Perspectives in Railway Timetabling: A Literature Review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 500-526, July.
    31. Lin, Kyle Y. & Sibdari, Soheil Y., 2009. "Dynamic price competition with discrete customer choices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(3), pages 969-980, September.
    32. Robenek, Tomáš & Maknoon, Yousef & Azadeh, Shadi Sharif & Chen, Jianghang & Bierlaire, Michel, 2016. "Passenger centric train timetabling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 107-126.
    33. Karabuk, Suleyman, 2009. "A nested decomposition approach for solving the paratransit vehicle scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 448-465, May.
    34. Vansteenwegen, P. & Oudheusden, D. Van, 2006. "Developing railway timetables which guarantee a better service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(1), pages 337-350, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xu, Zhandong & Xie, Jun & Liu, Xiaobo & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2020. "Hyperpath-based algorithms for the transit equilibrium assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    2. Yu, Liping & Liu, Huiran & Fang, Zhiming & Ye, Rui & Huang, Zhongyi & You, Yayun, 2023. "A new approach on passenger flow assignment with multi-connected agents," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 628(C).
    3. Zhan, Shuguang & Xie, Jiemin & Wong, S.C. & Zhu, Yongqiu & Corman, Francesco, 2024. "Handling uncertainty in train timetable rescheduling: A review of the literature and future research directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    4. Gu, Yu & Chen, Anthony & Kitthamkesorn, Songyot & Jang, Sunghoon, 2024. "Alternate closed-form weibit-based model for assessing travel choice with an oddball alternative," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    5. Wang, Xuekai & Tang, Tao & Su, Shuai & Yin, Jiateng & Gao, Ziyou & Lv, Nan, 2021. "An integrated energy-efficient train operation approach based on the space-time-speed network methodology," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    6. Xie, Jiemin & Zhan, Shuguang & Wong, S.C. & Wen, Keyu & Qiang, Lixia & Lo, S.M., 2022. "High-speed rail services for elderly passengers: Ticket-booking patterns and policy implications," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 96-106.
    7. Gu, Yu & Chen, Anthony & Kitthamkesorn, Songyot, 2022. "Weibit choice models: Properties, mode choice application and graphical illustrations," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Wenliang & Tian, Junli & Xue, Lijuan & Jiang, Min & Deng, Lianbo & Qin, Jin, 2017. "Multi-periodic train timetabling using a period-type-based Lagrangian relaxation decomposition," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 144-173.
    2. Liang, Jinpeng & Zang, Guangzhi & Liu, Haitao & Zheng, Jianfeng & Gao, Ziyou, 2023. "Reducing passenger waiting time in oversaturated metro lines with passenger flow control policy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    3. Yan, Fei & Goverde, Rob M.P., 2019. "Combined line planning and train timetabling for strongly heterogeneous railway lines with direct connections," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 20-46.
    4. Jiang, Feng & Cacchiani, Valentina & Toth, Paolo, 2017. "Train timetabling by skip-stop planning in highly congested lines," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 149-174.
    5. Yan, Fei & Bešinović, Nikola & Goverde, Rob M.P., 2019. "Multi-objective periodic railway timetabling on dense heterogeneous railway corridors," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 52-75.
    6. Zhang, Yongxiang & Peng, Qiyuan & Lu, Gongyuan & Zhong, Qingwei & Yan, Xu & Zhou, Xuesong, 2022. "Integrated line planning and train timetabling through price-based cross-resolution feedback mechanism," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 240-277.
    7. Liping Ge & Stefan Voß & Lin Xie, 2022. "Robustness and disturbances in public transport," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 191-261, March.
    8. Shi, Jungang & Yang, Jing & Yang, Lixing & Tao, Lefeng & Qiang, Shengjie & Di, Zhen & Guo, Junhua, 2023. "Safety-oriented train timetabling and stop planning with time-varying and elastic demand on overcrowded commuter metro lines," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    9. Xu, Xiangdong & Chen, Anthony & Kitthamkesorn, Songyot & Yang, Hai & Lo, Hong K., 2015. "Modeling absolute and relative cost differences in stochastic user equilibrium problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P3), pages 686-703.
    10. Wenliang Zhou & Wenzhuang Fan & Xiaorong You & Lianbo Deng, 2019. "Demand-Oriented Train Timetabling Integrated with Passenger Train-Booking Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-34, September.
    11. Yin, Jiateng & D’Ariano, Andrea & Wang, Yihui & Yang, Lixing & Tang, Tao, 2021. "Timetable coordination in a rail transit network with time-dependent passenger demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 183-202.
    12. Kang, Liujiang & Li, Hao & Sun, Huijun & Wu, Jianjun & Cao, Zhiguang & Buhigiro, Nsabimana, 2021. "First train timetabling and bus service bridging in intermodal bus-and-train transit networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 443-462.
    13. Zhou, Yu & Wang, Yun & Yang, Hai & Yan, Xuedong, 2019. "Last train scheduling for maximizing passenger destination reachability in urban rail transit networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 79-95.
    14. Polinder, G.-J. & Cacchiani, V. & Schmidt, M.E. & Huisman, D., 2020. "An iterative heuristic for passenger-centric train timetabling with integrated adaption times," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2020-006-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    15. Schön, Cornelia & König, Eva, 2018. "A stochastic dynamic programming approach for delay management of a single train line," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 501-518.
    16. Zhang, Yongxiang & Peng, Qiyuan & Yao, Yu & Zhang, Xin & Zhou, Xuesong, 2019. "Solving cyclic train timetabling problem through model reformulation: Extended time-space network construct and Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers methods," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 344-379.
    17. Polinder, G.-J. & Schmidt, M.E. & Huisman, D., 2020. "Timetabling for strategic passenger railway planning," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2020-001-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    18. Hartleb, Johann & Schmidt, Marie, 2022. "Railway timetabling with integrated passenger distribution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(3), pages 953-966.
    19. Nakayama, Shoichiro & Chikaraishi, Makoto, 2015. "Unified closed-form expression of logit and weibit and its extension to a transportation network equilibrium assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P3), pages 672-685.
    20. Li, Guoyuan & Chen, Anthony, 2023. "Strategy-based transit stochastic user equilibrium model with capacity and number-of-transfers constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 164-183.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:136:y:2020:i:c:s1366554518311086. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.