IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ems/eureir/79908.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analysis of FPTASes for the Multi-Objective Shortest Path Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Breugem, T.
  • Dollevoet, T.A.B.
  • van den Heuvel, W.

Abstract

We propose a new FPTAS for the multi-objective shortest path problem. The algorithm uses elements from both an exact labeling algorithm and an FPTAS proposed by Tsaggouris and Zaroliagis (2009). We analyze the running times of these three algorithms both from a the- oretical and a computational point of view. Theoretically, we show that there are instances for which the new FPTAS runs an arbitrary times faster than the other two algorithms. Fur- thermore, for the bi-objective case, the number of approximate solutions generated by the proposed FPTAS is at most the number of Pareto-optimal solutions multiplied by the number of nodes. By performing a set of computational tests, we show that the new FPTAS performs best in terms of running time in case there are many dominated paths and the number of Pareto-optimal solutions is not too small.

Suggested Citation

  • Breugem, T. & Dollevoet, T.A.B. & van den Heuvel, W., 2016. "Analysis of FPTASes for the Multi-Objective Shortest Path Problem," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2016-03, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:79908
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/79908/EI2016-03.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mote, John & Murthy, Ishwar & Olson, David L., 1991. "A parametric approach to solving bicriterion shortest path problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 81-92, July.
    2. Matthias Müller-Hannemann & Karsten Weihe, 2006. "On the cardinality of the Pareto set in bicriteria shortest path problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 269-286, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nir Halman & Mikhail Y. Kovalyov & Alain Quilliot & Dvir Shabtay & Moshe Zofi, 2019. "Bi-criteria path problem with minimum length and maximum survival probability," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(2), pages 469-489, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Machuca, E. & Mandow, L. & Pérez de la Cruz, J.L. & Ruiz-Sepulveda, A., 2012. "A comparison of heuristic best-first algorithms for bicriterion shortest path problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(1), pages 44-53.
    2. Duque, Daniel & Lozano, Leonardo & Medaglia, Andrés L., 2015. "An exact method for the biobjective shortest path problem for large-scale road networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(3), pages 788-797.
    3. Andrea Raith & Judith Wang & Matthias Ehrgott & Stuart Mitchell, 2014. "Solving multi-objective traffic assignment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 222(1), pages 483-516, November.
    4. Perny, Patrice & Spanjaard, Olivier, 2005. "A preference-based approach to spanning trees and shortest paths problems***," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(3), pages 584-601, May.
    5. Andrew Ensor & Felipe Lillo, 2016. "Colored-Edge Graph Approach for the Modeling of Multimodal Transportation Systems," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 33(01), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Xie, Chi & Travis Waller, S., 2012. "Parametric search and problem decomposition for approximating Pareto-optimal paths," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1043-1067.
    7. Matthias Müller-Hannemann & Karsten Weihe, 2006. "On the cardinality of the Pareto set in bicriteria shortest path problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 269-286, October.
    8. Soroush, H.M., 2008. "Optimal paths in bi-attribute networks with fractional cost functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(3), pages 633-658, November.
    9. Luigi Di Puglia Pugliese & Francesca Guerriero, 2013. "A Reference Point Approach for the Resource Constrained Shortest Path Problems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 247-265, May.
    10. Pascal Halffmann & Tobias Dietz & Anthony Przybylski & Stefan Ruzika, 2020. "An inner approximation method to compute the weight set decomposition of a triobjective mixed-integer problem," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 77(4), pages 715-742, August.
    11. Zhang, Yuli & Shen, Zuo-Jun Max & Song, Shiji, 2016. "Parametric search for the bi-attribute concave shortest path problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 150-168.
    12. Vidal, Thibaut & Laporte, Gilbert & Matl, Piotr, 2020. "A concise guide to existing and emerging vehicle routing problem variants," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(2), pages 401-416.
    13. S. Raghavan & Michael O. Ball & Vinai S. Trichur, 2002. "Bicriteria product design optimization: An efficient solution procedure using AND/OR trees," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(6), pages 574-592, September.
    14. Dunker, Thomas & Radons, Gunter & Westkamper, Engelbert, 2005. "Combining evolutionary computation and dynamic programming for solving a dynamic facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(1), pages 55-69, August.
    15. Ehrgott, Matthias & Wang, Judith Y.T. & Raith, Andrea & van Houtte, Chris, 2012. "A bi-objective cyclist route choice model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 652-663.
    16. Kuhn, K. & Raith, A. & Schmidt, M. & Schöbel, A., 2016. "Bi-objective robust optimisation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 418-431.
    17. Suvrajeet Sen & Rekha Pillai & Shirish Joshi & Ajay K. Rathi, 2001. "A Mean-Variance Model for Route Guidance in Advanced Traveler Information Systems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 37-49, February.
    18. Granat, Janusz & Guerriero, Francesca, 2003. "The interactive analysis of the multicriteria shortest path problem by the reference point method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(1), pages 103-118, November.
    19. Sedeño-noda, Antonio & Colebrook, Marcos, 2019. "A biobjective Dijkstra algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 106-118.
    20. Diclehan Tezcaner Öztürk & Murat Köksalan, 2016. "An interactive approach for biobjective integer programs under quasiconvex preference functions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 244(2), pages 677-696, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Shortest Path Problem; Multi-Objective Optimization; FPTAS; Complexity Analysis;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:79908. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RePub The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask RePub to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feeurnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.