IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ems/eureir/7031.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Goodness-of-fit tests for a heavy tailed distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Koning, A.J.
  • Peng, L.

Abstract

For testing whether a distribution function is heavy tailed, we study the Kolmogorov test, Berk-Jones test, score test and their integrated versions. A comparison is conducted via Bahadur efficiency and simulations. The score test and the integrated score test show the best performance. Although the Berk-Jones test is more powerful than the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, this does not hold true for their integrated versions; this differs from results in \\citet{EinmahlMckeague2003}, which shows the difference of Berk-Jones test in testing distributions and tails.

Suggested Citation

  • Koning, A.J. & Peng, L., 2005. "Goodness-of-fit tests for a heavy tailed distribution," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2005-44, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:7031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/7031/EI200544.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Armelle Guillou & Peter Hall, 2001. "A diagnostic for selecting the threshold in extreme value analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(2), pages 293-305.
    2. Einmahl, J.H.J. & McKeague, I.W., 2002. "Empirical Likelihood based on Hypothesis Testing," Other publications TiSEM 402576fa-8c0e-45e2-a394-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Li, Gang, 2003. "Nonparametric likelihood ratio goodness-of-fit tests for survival data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 166-182, July.
    4. Drees, Holger & Kaufmann, Edgar, 1998. "Selecting the optimal sample fraction in univariate extreme value estimation," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 149-172, July.
    5. McNeil, Alexander J., 1997. "Estimating the Tails of Loss Severity Distributions Using Extreme Value Theory," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(1), pages 117-137, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Siyuan & Qu, Qiang, 2016. "Dynamic collective routing using crowdsourcing data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 450-469.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tsourti, Zoi & Panaretos, John, 2003. "Extreme Value Index Estimators and Smoothing Alternatives: A Critical Review," MPRA Paper 6390, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. M. Ivette Gomes & Armelle Guillou, 2015. "Extreme Value Theory and Statistics of Univariate Extremes: A Review," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 83(2), pages 263-292, August.
    3. Wang, Yulong & Xiao, Zhijie, 2022. "Estimation and inference about tail features with tail censored data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 230(2), pages 363-387.
    4. Wager, Stefan, 2014. "Subsampling extremes: From block maxima to smooth tail estimation," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 335-353.
    5. Małgorzata Just & Krzysztof Echaust, 2021. "An Optimal Tail Selection in Risk Measurement," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Song Xi Chen & Jiti Gao, 2010. "Simultaneous Testing of Mean and Variance Structures in Nonlinear Time Series Models," School of Economics and Public Policy Working Papers 2010-28, University of Adelaide, School of Economics and Public Policy.
    7. Laurens Haan & Cécile Mercadier & Chen Zhou, 2016. "Adapting extreme value statistics to financial time series: dealing with bias and serial dependence," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 321-354, April.
    8. Goegebeur, Yuri & Guillou, Armelle & Pedersen, Tine & Qin, Jing, 2022. "Extreme-value based estimation of the conditional tail moment with application to reinsurance rating," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 102-122.
    9. Lee, J. & Fan, Y. & Sisson, S.A., 2015. "Bayesian threshold selection for extremal models using measures of surprise," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 84-99.
    10. Wang, Yinzhi & Hobæk Haff, Ingrid & Huseby, Arne, 2020. "Modelling extreme claims via composite models and threshold selection methods," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 257-268.
    11. Holger Drees & Laurens F.M. de Haan & Sidney Resnick, 1998. "How to make a Hill Plot," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-090/4, Tinbergen Institute.
    12. Chen, Song X. & Delaigle, Aurore & Hall, Peter, 2010. "Nonparametric estimation for a class of Lévy processes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 157(2), pages 257-271, August.
    13. Hubert, Mia & Dierckx, Goedele & Vanpaemel, Dina, 2013. "Detecting influential data points for the Hill estimator in Pareto-type distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 13-28.
    14. Yuri Goegebeur & Tertius de Wet, 2012. "Estimation of the third-order parameter in extreme value statistics," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 21(2), pages 330-354, June.
    15. Danielsson, J. & de Haan, L. & Peng, L. & de Vries, C. G., 2001. "Using a Bootstrap Method to Choose the Sample Fraction in Tail Index Estimation," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 226-248, February.
    16. Gijbels, Irène & Sznajder, Dominik, 2013. "Testing tail monotonicity by constrained copula estimation," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 338-351.
    17. Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan & Laurent Bordes & Christian Paroissin & Jean-Christophe Turlot, 2016. "Single change-point detection methods for small lifetime samples," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 79(5), pages 531-551, July.
    18. S. A. Abu Bakar & Saralees Nadarajah & Z. A. Absl Kamarul Adzhar, 2018. "Loss modeling using Burr mixtures," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 1503-1516, June.
    19. Giorgio Fagiolo & Mauro Napoletano & Andrea Roventini, 2008. "Are output growth-rate distributions fat-tailed? some evidence from OECD countries," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(5), pages 639-669.
    20. Dingshi Tian & Zongwu Cai & Ying Fang, 2018. "Econometric Modeling of Risk Measures: A Selective Review of the Recent Literature," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 201807, University of Kansas, Department of Economics, revised Oct 2018.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:7031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RePub (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feeurnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.