IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssb/v63y2001i2p293-305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A diagnostic for selecting the threshold in extreme value analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Armelle Guillou
  • Peter Hall

Abstract

A new approach is suggested for choosing the threshold when fitting the Hill estimator of a tail exponent to extreme value data. Our method is based on an easily computed diagnostic, which in turn is founded directly on the Hill estimator itself, ‘symmetrized’ to remove the effect of the tail exponent but designed to emphasize biases in estimates of that exponent. The attractions of the method are its accuracy, its simplicity and the generality with which it applies. This generality implies that the technique has somewhat different goals from more conventional approaches, which are designed to accommodate the minor component of a postulated two‐component Pareto mixture. Our approach does not rely on the second component being Pareto distributed. Nevertheless, in the conventional setting it performs competitively with recently proposed methods, and in more general cases it achieves optimal rates of convergence. A by‐product of our development is a very simple and practicable exponential approximation to the distribution of the Hill estimator under departures from the Pareto distribution.

Suggested Citation

  • Armelle Guillou & Peter Hall, 2001. "A diagnostic for selecting the threshold in extreme value analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(2), pages 293-305.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:63:y:2001:i:2:p:293-305
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9868.00286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00286
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9868.00286?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:63:y:2001:i:2:p:293-305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.