IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ems/eureir/13777.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A method for clustering surgical cases to allow master surgical scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • van Oostrum, J.M.
  • Parlevliet, T.
  • Wagelmans, A.P.M.
  • Kazemier, G.

Abstract

Master surgical scheduling can improve manageability and efficiency of operating room departments. This approach cyclically executes a master surgical schedule of surgery types. These surgery types need to be constructed with low variability to be efficient. Each surgery type is scheduled based upon its frequency per cycle. Surgery types that cannot be scheduled repetitively are put together in so-called dummy surgeries. Narrow defined surgery types, with low variability, lead to a large volume of such dummy surgeries that reduce the benefits of a master surgical scheduling approach. In this paper we propose a method, based on Ward's hierarchical cluster method, to obtain surgery types that minimizes the weighted sum of the dummy surgery volume and the variability in resource demand of surgery types. The resulting surgery types (clusters) are thus based on logical features and can be used in master surgical scheduling. The approach is successfully tested on a case study in a regional hospital.

Suggested Citation

  • van Oostrum, J.M. & Parlevliet, T. & Wagelmans, A.P.M. & Kazemier, G., 2008. "A method for clustering surgical cases to allow master surgical scheduling," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2008-26, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:13777
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/13777/EI%202008-26.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blake, John T. & Carter, Michael W., 2002. "A goal programming approach to strategic resource allocation in acute care hospitals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(3), pages 541-561, August.
    2. David Dilts & Joseph Khamalah & Ann Plotkin, 1995. "Using Cluster Analysis for Medical Resource Decision Making," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 15(4), pages 333-346, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. G.J. Melman & A.K. Parlikad & E.A.B. Cameron, 2021. "Balancing scarce hospital resources during the COVID-19 pandemic using discrete-event simulation," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 356-374, June.
    2. Pablo Santibáñez & Mehmet Begen & Derek Atkins, 2007. "Surgical block scheduling in a system of hospitals: an application to resource and wait list management in a British Columbia health authority," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 269-282, September.
    3. Michael Samudra & Carla Van Riet & Erik Demeulemeester & Brecht Cardoen & Nancy Vansteenkiste & Frank E. Rademakers, 2016. "Scheduling operating rooms: achievements, challenges and pitfalls," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 493-525, October.
    4. Wang, Derek D., 2019. "Performance-based resource allocation for higher education institutions in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 66-75.
    5. Zhang, Ganggang & Wu, Jie & Zhu, Qingyuan, 2020. "Performance evaluation and enrollment quota allocation for higher education institutions in China," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    6. X Li & P Beullens & D Jones & M Tamiz, 2009. "An integrated queuing and multi-objective bed allocation model with application to a hospital in China," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(3), pages 330-338, March.
    7. Burdett, Robert L & Corry, Paul & Yarlagadda, Prasad & Cook, David & Birgan, Sean & McPhail, Steven M, 2023. "A mathematical framework for regional hospital case mix planning and capacity appraisal," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 10(C).
    8. Cardoen, Brecht & Demeulemeester, Erik & Beliën, Jeroen, 2010. "Operating room planning and scheduling: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 921-932, March.
    9. Paola Cappanera & Filippo Visintin & Carlo Banditori, 2018. "Addressing conflicting stakeholders’ priorities in surgical scheduling by goal programming," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 252-271, June.
    10. J P Oddoye & M A Yaghoobi & M Tamiz & D F Jones & P Schmidt, 2007. "A multi-objective model to determine efficient resource levels in a medical assessment unit," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(12), pages 1563-1573, December.
    11. Angela Testi & Elena Tànfani, 2009. "Tactical and operational decisions for operating room planning: Efficiency and welfare implications," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 363-373, December.
    12. Fainman, Emily Zhu & Kucukyazici, Beste, 2020. "Design of financial incentives and payment schemes in healthcare systems: A review," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    13. E. Demeulemeester & W. Sermeus & J. Beliën & B. Cardoen, 2007. "Clinical pathways and operations management. It takes two to tango," Review of Business and Economic Literature, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Review of Business and Economic Literature, vol. 0(3), pages 451-470.
    14. Cheng Guo & Merve Bodur & Dionne M. Aleman & David R. Urbach, 2021. "Logic-Based Benders Decomposition and Binary Decision Diagram Based Approaches for Stochastic Distributed Operating Room Scheduling," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1551-1569, October.
    15. Keshtkaran, Mahsa & Churilov, Leonid & Hearne, John & Abbasi, Babak & Meretoja, Atte, 2016. "Validation of a decision support model for investigation and improvement in stroke thrombolysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(1), pages 154-169.
    16. Francesca Guerriero & Rosita Guido, 2011. "Operational research in the management of the operating theatre: a survey," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 89-114, March.
    17. Angela Testi & Elena Tanfani & Giancarlo Torre, 2007. "A three-phase approach for operating theatre schedules," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 163-172, June.
    18. Yang, Xiaopeng & Zheng, Danheng & Sieminowski, Tammy & Paradi, Joseph C., 2015. "A dynamic benchmarking system for assessing the recovery of inpatients: Evidence from the neurorehabilitation process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(2), pages 582-591.
    19. Şeyda Gür & Tamer Eren & Hacı Mehmet Alakaş, 2019. "Surgical Operation Scheduling with Goal Programming and Constraint Programming: A Case Study," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-24, March.
    20. Fernanda Bravo & Marcus Braun & Vivek Farias & Retsef Levi & Christine Lynch & John Tumolo & Richard Whyte, 2021. "Optimization-driven framework to understand health care network costs and resource allocation," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 640-660, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:13777. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RePub (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feeurnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.