IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/flsman/v30y2018i1d10.1007_s10696-016-9255-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Addressing conflicting stakeholders’ priorities in surgical scheduling by goal programming

Author

Listed:
  • Paola Cappanera

    (University of Florence)

  • Filippo Visintin

    (University of Florence)

  • Carlo Banditori

    (University of Florence)

Abstract

In this study, we propose a mixed integer multi-objective model which allows determining the number and typology of surgeries to be scheduled in each OR, day and session of a multiple day planning period, in context where each OR session of the planning horizon has already been assigned to a specialty, with the (multiple) objective of obtaining a desired: (i) patient due date fulfilment rate, (ii) OR utilisation, (iii) bed utilisation, (iv) number of scheduled surgeries. These objectives, reflect heterogeneous priorities of different stakeholders of the surgical scheduling process. To address the described multi-objective problem, we use a goal programming approach and we show how the exploration of the weight space, typical of such approach, can be more efficient if informed by a correlation analysis. The results presented in this study are based on real data from the Meyer University Children’s Hospital in Florence.

Suggested Citation

  • Paola Cappanera & Filippo Visintin & Carlo Banditori, 2018. "Addressing conflicting stakeholders’ priorities in surgical scheduling by goal programming," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 252-271, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:flsman:v:30:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10696-016-9255-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10696-016-9255-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10696-016-9255-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10696-016-9255-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Filippo Visintin & Paola Cappanera & Carlo Banditori, 2016. "Evaluating the impact of flexible practices on the master surgical scheduling process: an empirical analysis," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 182-205, June.
    2. Jones, Dylan, 2011. "A practical weight sensitivity algorithm for goal and multiple objective programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 238-245, August.
    3. Pablo Santibáñez & Mehmet Begen & Derek Atkins, 2007. "Surgical block scheduling in a system of hospitals: an application to resource and wait list management in a British Columbia health authority," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 269-282, September.
    4. Cappanera, Paola & Visintin, Filippo & Banditori, Carlo, 2014. "Comparing resource balancing criteria in master surgical scheduling: A combined optimisation-simulation approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 179-196.
    5. Blake, John T. & Carter, Michael W., 2002. "A goal programming approach to strategic resource allocation in acute care hospitals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(3), pages 541-561, August.
    6. K F Lam, 2010. "In the determination of weight sets to compute cross-efficiency ratios in DEA," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(1), pages 134-143, January.
    7. Brian Denton & James Viapiano & Andrea Vogl, 2007. "Optimization of surgery sequencing and scheduling decisions under uncertainty," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 13-24, February.
    8. Sebastian Rachuba & Brigitte Werners, 2014. "A robust approach for scheduling in hospitals using multiple objectives," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 65(4), pages 546-556, April.
    9. Cardoen, Brecht & Demeulemeester, Erik & Beliën, Jeroen, 2010. "Operating room planning and scheduling: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 921-932, March.
    10. Dylan Jones & Mehrdad Tamiz, 2010. "Practical Goal Programming," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 1, number 978-1-4419-5771-9, April.
    11. Jebali, AIda & Hadj Alouane, Atidel B. & Ladet, Pierre, 2006. "Operating rooms scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(1-2), pages 52-62, February.
    12. M Zohrehbandian & A Makui & A Alinezhad, 2010. "A compromise solution approach for finding common weights in DEA: an improvement to Kao and Hung's approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(4), pages 604-610, April.
    13. Guinet, Alain & Chaabane, Sondes, 2003. "Operating theatre planning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 69-81, July.
    14. Mengyu Guo & Su Wu & Binfeng Li & Jie Song & Youping Rong, 2016. "Integrated scheduling of elective surgeries and surgical nurses for operating room suites," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 166-181, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sean Harris & David Claudio, 2022. "Current Trends in Operating Room Scheduling 2015 to 2020: a Literature Review," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-42, March.
    2. Aisha Tayyab & Saif Ullah & Mohammed Fazle Baki, 2023. "An Outer Approximation Method for Scheduling Elective Surgeries with Sequence Dependent Setup Times to Multiple Operating Rooms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Filipe Alves & Lino A. Costa & Ana Maria A. C. Rocha & Ana I. Pereira & Paulo Leitão, 2022. "The Sustainable Home Health Care Process Based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Support," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Aringhieri, Roberto & Duma, Davide & Landa, Paolo & Mancini, Simona, 2022. "Combining workload balance and patient priority maximisation in operating room planning through hierarchical multi-objective optimisation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(2), pages 627-643.
    5. Şeyda Gür & Tamer Eren, 2018. "Scheduling and Planning in Service Systems with Goal Programming: Literature Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Sara Vannelli & Filippo Visintin & Clio Dosi & Laura Fiorini & Erika Rovini & Filippo Cavallo, 2024. "A Framework for the Human-Centered Design of Service Processes Enabled by Medical Devices: A Case Study of Wearable Devices for Parkinson’s Disease," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(10), pages 1-30, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Samudra & Carla Van Riet & Erik Demeulemeester & Brecht Cardoen & Nancy Vansteenkiste & Frank E. Rademakers, 2016. "Scheduling operating rooms: achievements, challenges and pitfalls," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 493-525, October.
    2. Shuwan Zhu & Wenjuan Fan & Shanlin Yang & Jun Pei & Panos M. Pardalos, 2019. "Operating room planning and surgical case scheduling: a review of literature," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 757-805, April.
    3. Aisha Tayyab & Saif Ullah & Mohammed Fazle Baki, 2023. "An Outer Approximation Method for Scheduling Elective Surgeries with Sequence Dependent Setup Times to Multiple Operating Rooms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Cardoen, Brecht & Demeulemeester, Erik & Beliën, Jeroen, 2010. "Operating room planning and scheduling: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 921-932, March.
    5. Francesca Guerriero & Rosita Guido, 2011. "Operational research in the management of the operating theatre: a survey," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 89-114, March.
    6. Vijayakumar, Bharathwaj & Parikh, Pratik J. & Scott, Rosalyn & Barnes, April & Gallimore, Jennie, 2013. "A dual bin-packing approach to scheduling surgical cases at a publicly-funded hospital," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(3), pages 583-591.
    7. Sean Harris & David Claudio, 2022. "Current Trends in Operating Room Scheduling 2015 to 2020: a Literature Review," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-42, March.
    8. Silva, Thiago A.O. & de Souza, Mauricio C. & Saldanha, Rodney R. & Burke, Edmund K., 2015. "Surgical scheduling with simultaneous employment of specialised human resources," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 719-730.
    9. Gartner, Daniel & Kolisch, Rainer, 2014. "Scheduling the hospital-wide flow of elective patients," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 689-699.
    10. Cappanera, Paola & Visintin, Filippo & Banditori, Carlo, 2014. "Comparing resource balancing criteria in master surgical scheduling: A combined optimisation-simulation approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 179-196.
    11. Eun, Joonyup & Kim, Sang-Phil & Yih, Yuehwern & Tiwari, Vikram, 2019. "Scheduling elective surgery patients considering time-dependent health urgency: Modeling and solution approaches," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 137-153.
    12. Vahid Roshanaei & Curtiss Luong & Dionne M. Aleman & David R. Urbach, 2017. "Collaborative Operating Room Planning and Scheduling," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 558-580, August.
    13. Guillermo Durán & Pablo A. Rey & Patricio Wolff, 2017. "Solving the operating room scheduling problem with prioritized lists of patients," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 258(2), pages 395-414, November.
    14. Javiera Barrera & Rodrigo A. Carrasco & Susana Mondschein & Gianpiero Canessa & David Rojas-Zalazar, 2020. "Operating room scheduling under waiting time constraints: the Chilean GES plan," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 286(1), pages 501-527, March.
    15. Alessandro Agnetis & Alberto Coppi & Matteo Corsini & Gabriella Dellino & Carlo Meloni & Marco Pranzo, 2014. "A decomposition approach for the combined master surgical schedule and surgical case assignment problems," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 49-59, March.
    16. Zexian Zeng & Xiaolei Xie & Heidi Menaker & Susan G. Sanford-Ring & Jingshan Li, 2018. "Performance evaluation of operating room schedules in orthopedic surgery," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 198-223, June.
    17. Penn, M.L. & Potts, C.N. & Harper, P.R., 2017. "Multiple criteria mixed-integer programming for incorporating multiple factors into the development of master operating theatre timetables," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(1), pages 194-206.
    18. Marques, Inês & Captivo, M. Eugénia, 2017. "Different stakeholders’ perspectives for a surgical case assignment problem: Deterministic and robust approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 260-278.
    19. Morteza Lalmazloumian & M. Fazle Baki & Majid Ahmadi, 2023. "A two-stage stochastic optimization framework to allocate operating room capacity in publicly-funded hospitals under uncertainty," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 238-260, June.
    20. repec:ipg:wpaper:2013-014 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Antti Peltokorpi, 2011. "How do strategic decisions and operative practices affect operating room productivity?," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 370-382, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:flsman:v:30:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10696-016-9255-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.