IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cor/louvco/2006030.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Constructing self-concordant barriers for convex cones

Author

Listed:
  • NESTEROV, Yu.

Abstract

In this paper we develop a technique for constructing self-concordant barriers for convex cones. We start from a simple proof for a variant of standard result [1] on transformation of a -self-concordant barrier for a set into a self-concordant barrier for its conic hull with parameter (3.08 + 3.57)2 . Further, we develop a convenient composition theorem for constructing barriers directly for convex cones. In particular, we can construct now good barriers for several interesting cones obtained as a conic hull of epigraph of a univariate function. This technique works for power functions, entropy, logarithm and exponent function, etc. It provides a background for development of polynomial-time methods for separable optimization problems. Thus, our abilities in constructing good barriers for convex sets and cones become now identical.

Suggested Citation

  • NESTEROV, Yu., 2006. "Constructing self-concordant barriers for convex cones," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2006030, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    • Handle: RePEc:cor:louvco:2006030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://sites.uclouvain.be/core/publications/coredp/coredp2006.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. NESTEROV, Yu., 2006. "Towards nonsymmetric conic optimization," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2006028, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    2. Yu. E. Nesterov & M. J. Todd, 1997. "Self-Scaled Barriers and Interior-Point Methods for Convex Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 1-42, February.
    3. NESTEROV ., Yurii E. & TODD , Michael J, 1994. "Self-Scaled Cones and Interior-Point Methods in Nonlinear Programming," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 1994062, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Quoc Tran-Dinh & Anastasios Kyrillidis & Volkan Cevher, 2018. "A Single-Phase, Proximal Path-Following Framework," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 1326-1347, November.
    2. Da Tian, 2014. "An entire space polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 109-135, January.
    3. Mehdi Karimi & Levent Tunçel, 2020. "Primal–Dual Interior-Point Methods for Domain-Driven Formulations," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 591-621, May.
    4. NESTEROV, Yu., 2006. "Nonsymmetric potential-reduction methods for general cones," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2006034, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    5. Chris Coey & Lea Kapelevich & Juan Pablo Vielma, 2022. "Solving Natural Conic Formulations with Hypatia.jl," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2686-2699, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Chares & François Glineur, 2008. "An interior-point method for the single-facility location problem with mixed norms using a conic formulation," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 68(3), pages 383-405, December.
    2. Terlaky, Tamas, 2001. "An easy way to teach interior-point methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 1-19, April.
    3. J.F. Sturm & S. Zhang, 1998. "On Sensitivity of Central Solutions in Semidefinite Programming," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-040/4, Tinbergen Institute.
    4. Sturm, J.F., 2001. "Avoiding Numerical Cancellation in the Interior Point Method for Solving Semidefinite Programs," Discussion Paper 2001-27, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    5. NESTEROV, Yu., 2006. "Towards nonsymmetric conic optimization," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2006028, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    6. Alemseged Weldeyesus & Mathias Stolpe, 2015. "A primal-dual interior point method for large-scale free material optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 409-435, June.
    7. Ali Mohammad-Nezhad & Tamás Terlaky, 2017. "A polynomial primal-dual affine scaling algorithm for symmetric conic optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 66(3), pages 577-600, April.
    8. Helmberg, C., 2002. "Semidefinite programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(3), pages 461-482, March.
    9. Chee-Khian Sim, 2019. "Interior point method on semi-definite linear complementarity problems using the Nesterov–Todd (NT) search direction: polynomial complexity and local convergence," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 583-621, November.
    10. Sturm, J.F., 2001. "Avoiding Numerical Cancellation in the Interior Point Method for Solving Semidefinite Programs," Other publications TiSEM 949fb20a-a2c6-4d87-85ea-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Michael Orlitzky, 2021. "Gaddum’s test for symmetric cones," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 79(4), pages 927-940, April.
    12. B.V. Halldórsson & R.H. Tütüncü, 2003. "An Interior-Point Method for a Class of Saddle-Point Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 116(3), pages 559-590, March.
    13. G. Q. Wang & Y. Q. Bai, 2012. "A New Full Nesterov–Todd Step Primal–Dual Path-Following Interior-Point Algorithm for Symmetric Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 154(3), pages 966-985, September.
    14. G. Q. Wang & L. C. Kong & J. Y. Tao & G. Lesaja, 2015. "Improved Complexity Analysis of Full Nesterov–Todd Step Feasible Interior-Point Method for Symmetric Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 166(2), pages 588-604, August.
    15. E. A. Yıldırım, 2003. "An Interior-Point Perspective on Sensitivity Analysis in Semidefinite Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 649-676, November.
    16. Xiao-Kang Wang & Wen-Hui Hou & Chao Song & Min-Hui Deng & Yong-Yi Li & Jian-Qiang Wang, 2021. "BW-MaxEnt: A Novel MCDM Method for Limited Knowledge," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-17, July.
    17. Héctor Ramírez & David Sossa, 2017. "On the Central Paths in Symmetric Cone Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 172(2), pages 649-668, February.
    18. Vasile L. Basescu & John E. Mitchell, 2008. "An Analytic Center Cutting Plane Approach for Conic Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 529-551, August.
    19. Ximei Yang & Hongwei Liu & Yinkui Zhang, 2015. "A New Strategy in the Complexity Analysis of an Infeasible-Interior-Point Method for Symmetric Cone Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 166(2), pages 572-587, August.
    20. G. Q. Wang & Y. Q. Bai & X. Y. Gao & D. Z. Wang, 2015. "Improved Complexity Analysis of Full Nesterov–Todd Step Interior-Point Methods for Semidefinite Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 242-262, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cor:louvco:2006030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alain GILLIS (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/coreebe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.